Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improvement of the IVS-INT01 sessions by source selection: development and evaluation of the maximal source strategy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of the International very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) Service for Geodesy and Astrometry Intensive sessions is the rapid estimation of UT1-TAI. Improving the robustness and the precision of the UT1 estimates from the Intensives is an important goal. The INT01 series, which usually uses the Kokee–Wettzell baseline and runs on weekdays, is the most regular IVS Intensive series. The United States Naval Observatory which schedules these sessions traditionally used a small list of strong sources. In 2009, the authors requested and received the use of nine IVS R&D sessions for the evaluation of a new strategy which draws on all sources mutually visible on the Kokee–Wettzell baseline. Analysis of these sessions was sufficiently promising that in July 2010, USNO began to alternate the use of the original and the new strategy in scheduling the INT01 sessions to assess the operational effectiveness of the proposed strategy. In this paper, we summarize our analysis of the R&D sessions, and we also analyze 2 years of operational INT01 sessions. Considered in toto, the new strategy performs as well as, or better than, the original strategy in terms of several measures of robustness and precision. Furthermore, the RMS difference of the UT1 estimates from the 1 h operational INTO1 sessions and concurrently run 24 h VLBI sessions is 21.0 \(\upmu \)s, compared to 30.7 \(\upmu \)s using the standard strategy, indicating that the new strategy is, on average, 30 % more accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baver K, Gipson J (2010) Strategies for improving the IVS-INT01 UT1 estimates. In: Behrend D, Baver KD (eds) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2010 general meeting proceedings, pp 256–260, NASA/CP-2010-215864

  • Baver K, Gipson J (2013) Refining the uniform sky strategy for IVS-INT01 scheduling. In: Zubko N, Poutanen M (eds) Proceedings of the 21st meeting of the European VLBI group for geodesy and astrometry, pp 205–209

  • Baver K, Gipson J (2014) Balancing sky coverage and source strength in the improvement of the IVS-INT01 sessions. In: Behrend D, Baver KD, Armstrong KL (eds) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2014 general meeting proceedings, pp 267–271, Science Press, Beijing, ISBN 978-7-03-042974-2

  • Baver K, Gipson J, Carter MS, Kingham K (2012) Assessment of the first use of the uniform sky strategy in scheduling the operational IVS-INT01 sessions. In: Behrend D, Baver KD (eds) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2012 general meeting proceedings, pp 251–255, NASA/CP-2012-217504

  • Baver K, MacMillan D, Petrov L, Gordon D (2004) Analysis of the VLBI intensive sessions. In: Vandenberg NR, Baver KD (eds) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2004 general meeting proceedings, pp 394–398, NASA/CP-2004-212255

  • Bizouard C, Gambix D (2005) The combined solution C04 for earth orientation parameters consistent with international terestrial reference frame. In: International association of geodesy symposia, vol 134, pp 265–270

  • Gipson J (2010) An introduction to sked. In: Behrend D, Baver KD (eds) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2010 general meeting proceedings, pp 77–84, NASA/CP-2010-215864

  • Gipson J (2012) Sked users manual. http://lupus.gsfc.nasa.gov/files_user_manuals/sked/sked.pdf

  • Leek J, Artz T, Notnagel A (2015) Optimzed scheduling of VLBI UT1 intensive sesions for twin telescopes employing impact factor analysis. J Geodesy 89:911–924. doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0823-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson T, Gradinarsky L, Elgered G (2005) Correlations between slant wet delays measured by microwave radiometry. IEEE Tranbs Geosci Remote Sens 43(5):1028–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson T, Haas R (2010) Impact of atmospheric turbulence on geodetic baseline interferometry. J Geophys Res 115:B03407. doi:10.1029/2009JB006579

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothnagel A, Leek J, Artz T (2015) Sophistication in UT1-Intensive scheduling by using impact factors—first results of field tests. In: Proceedings of the 22nd meeting of the European VLBI Group for geodesy and astrometry

  • Nothnagel A, Schnell D (2008) The impact of errors in polar motion and nutation on UT1 determinations from VLBI Intensive obser-vations. J Geod 82(12):863. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0212-2

  • Pany A, Böhm J, MacMillan D, Schuh H, Nilsson T, Wresnik J (2011) Monte Carlo simulations of the impact of troposphere, clock and measurement errors on the repeatability of VLBI positions. J Geodesy 85(1):39–50. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0415-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Luzum B, IERS Conventions (2010) IERS Technical Note No. 36. International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service. Frankfurt, Germany

  • Ray JR, Carter WE, Robertson DS (1995) Assessment of the accuracy of IRIS Intensive daily UT1 determination. J Geophys Res 100(B5):8193–8200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1996) Measurements of the length of day using the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 101(B9):20141–20149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakos N, Carter S, Shumate N, Rapid Service/Prediction Centre, Dick W, Thaller D (eds) (2013) IERS 2013 Annual Report

  • Thaller D, Tesmer V, Dach R, Krugel M, Rothacker M, Steigenberg P (2008) Combining VLBI intensive with GNSS rapid solutions for deriving a stable UT time series. In: Finkelstein A, Behrend D (eds) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2008 general meeting proceedings, pp 8–13

  • Treuhaft RN, Lanyi GE (1987) The effect of the dynamic wet troposphere on radio interferometric measurements. Radio Sci 22(2):251–265. doi:10.1029/RS022i002p00251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uunila M, Nothnagel A, Leek J (2012) Influence of source constellans on UT1 derived from IVS INT1 sessions. In: International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry 2012 general meeting proceedings, pp 395–399

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported under NASA contract NNG12HP00C. The authors would like to thank David Gordon (NVI, Inc.) for providing helpful advice about using the Greenwich Sideal Time (GST) to compare the Intensive sessions. We would also like to thank Daniel MacMillan (NVI, Inc.) for providing information about atmospheric turbulence simulations and assistance in configuring them. We would like to thank Kerry Kingham and David Hall (USNO) for their support of the alternating operational IVS-INT01 sessions. Especially, we would like to thank Merri Sue Carter (USNO Flagstaff Station) for her scheduling of the alternating operational IVS-INT01 sessions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NVI, Inc., 7257D Hanover Parkway, Greenbelt, MD, 20770, USA

    John Gipson & Karen Baver

Authors
  1. John Gipson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen Baver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Gipson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gipson, J., Baver, K. Improvement of the IVS-INT01 sessions by source selection: development and evaluation of the maximal source strategy. J Geod 90, 287–303 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0873-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0873-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation