Abstract
With the advent of geodetic satellite missions mapping almost globally the Earth’s gravitational field, new methods and theoretical approaches have been developed and investigated to fully exploit the potential of their new observables. Besides estimating values of numerical coefficients in harmonic series of the gravitational potential, new applications emerged such as data validation and combination. In this contribution, new integral transformations are presented which transform principal components of the terrestrial deflection of the vertical onto disturbing satellite-to-satellite tracking and gradiometric data at altitude. Using spherical approximation, necessary integral kernel functions are derived in both spectral and closed forms. The behaviour of isotropic kernel functions is studied and the new integral transformations are tested in a closed-loop simulation using synthetic terrestrial and satellite data synthesized from a global gravitational model. New integral transformations can be used for data validation and combination purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of mathematical functions. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC
Bölling C, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. J Geodesy 79:300–330
Case K, Kuizinga G, Wu S-C (2010) GRACE level 1B data product user handbook. Version 1.3, March 24 2010, JPL D-22027, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA
Denker H (2003) Computation of gravity gradients for Europe for calibration/validation of GOCE data. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002, 3rd meeting of the IGGC, Ziti Editions, pp 287–292
Drinkwater MR, Haagmans R, Muzi D, Popescu A, Floberghagen R, Kern M, Fehringer M (2007) The GOCE gravity mission: ESA’s first core Earth Explorer. In: Proceedings of 3rd international GOCE user workshop, 6–8 November, 2006, Frascati, Italy, ESA SP-627, pp 1–8
Ecker E (1970) Upward continuation of the deflections of the vertical by spherical integral formulas. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 14:93–96
ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. ESA SP-1233(1), Report for mission selection of the four candidate earth explorer missions, ESA Publication Division
Eshagh M (2011a) On integral approach to regional gravity field modelling from satellite gradiometric data. Acta Geophys. 59:29–54
Eshagh M (2011b) The effect of spatial truncation error on the integral inversion of satellite gravity gradiometry data. Adv Space Res 45:1238–1247
Eshagh M, Ghorbannia M (2013) The use of Gaussian equations of motions of a satellite for local gravity anomaly recovery. Adv Space Res 52:30–38
Garcia RV (2002) Local geoid determination from GRACE mission. Report No. 460, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Grafarend EW (2001) The spherical horizontal and spherical vertical boundary value problem-vertical deflections and geoid undulations-the completed Meissl diagram. J Geodesy 75:363–390
Green G (1828) An essay on the application of mathematical analysis to the theories of electricity and magnetism. T. Wheelhouse, Nottingham 72 pp
Haagmans R, Prijatna K, Omang OCD (2003) An alternative concept for validation of GOCE gradiometry results based on regional gravity. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002. 3rd meeting of the IGGC, Ziti Editions, pp 281–286
Heck B (1979) Zur lokalen Geoidbestimmung aus terrestrischen Messungen vertikaler Schweregradienten. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Nr. 259, München, Germany
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
Hirt C, Seeber G (2008) Accuracy analysis of vertical deflection data observed with the Hannover Digital Zenith Camera System TZK2-D. J Geodesy 82:347–356
Hirt C, Gruber T, Featherstone WE (2011) Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights. J Geodesy 85:723–740
Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. ESSA Monograph No. 2, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC
Hwang C (1998) Inverse Vening Meinesz formula and deflection-geoid formula: applications to the predictions of gravity and geoid over South China Sea. J Geodesy 72:304–312
Jekeli C (2000) Calibration/validation methods for GRACE. In: Schwarz KP (ed) Geodesy beyond 2000. IAG symposia series 121, Springer, Berlin pp 83–88
Jekeli C (2007) Potential theory and static gravity field of the Earth. In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 3., Elsevier, Oxford, pp 11–42
Jekeli C, Lee J-K, Kwon JH (2007) Modeling errors in upward continuation for INS gravity compensation. J Geodesy 81:297–309
Keller W, Sharifi MA (2005) Satellite gradiometry using a satellite pair. J Geodesy 78:544–557
Kellogg OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory. Dover Publications, New York
Kern M, Haagmans R (2005) Determination of gravity gradients from terrestrial gravity data for calibration and validation of gradiometric data. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions, IAG symposia series 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–100
Kernighan BW, Ritchie DM (1988) The C programming language, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, USA
Koop R (1993) Global gravity field modelling using satellite gravity gradiometry. Publications on Geodesy, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, No. 38, Delft, The Netherlands
Krantz SG (1999) A panorama of harmonic analysis. The Carus Mathematical Monographs, No. 27, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC
Li J (2002) A formula for computing the gravity disturbance from the second radial derivative of the disturbing potential. J Geodesy 76:226–231
Li J (2005) Integral formulas for computing the disturbing potential, gravity anomaly and the deflection of the vertical from the second-order radial gradient of the disturbing potential. J Geodesy 79:64–70
Martinec Z (2003) Green’s function solution to spherical gradiometric boundary-value problems. J Geodesy 77:41–49
Meissl P (1971) A study of covariance functions related to the Earth’s disturbing potential. Report No. 151, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Moritz H (2000) Geodetic reference system 1980. J Geodesy 74:128–133
Novák P (2003) Geoid determination using one-step integration. J Geodesy 77:193–206
Novák P (2007) Integral inversion of SST data of type GRACE. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 51:351–367
Novák P, Austen G, Sharifi MA, Grafarend EW (2006) Mapping Earth’s gravitation using GRACE data. In: Flury J, Rummel R, Reigber C, Rothacher M, Boedecker G, Schreiber U (eds) Observation of the earth system from space. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–164
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the Earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res (Solid Earth) 117:B04406
Petrovskaya MS, Zielinski JB (1997) Determination of the global and regional gravitational fields from satellite and balloon gradiometry missions. Adv Space Res 19:1723–1728
Pick M, Pícha J, Vyskočil V (1973) Theory of the Earth’s gravity field. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Pizzetti P (1911) Sopra il calcolo teorico delle deviazioni del geoide dall’ ellissoide. Atti della Reale Accademia della Scienze di Torino 46:331
Reed GB (1973) Application of kinematical geodesy for determining the short wavelength components of the gravity field by satellite gradiometry. Report No. 201, Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Sciences, Columbus
Rummel R, van Gelderen M (1995) Meissl scheme-spectral characteristics of physical geodesy. Manuscripta Geodaetica 20: 379–385
Sünkel H (1981) Feasibility for the prediction of the gravity disturbance vector in high altitudes. Report No. 311, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
Stokes GG (1849) On the variation of gravity on the surface of the Earth. Trans Camb Philos Soc 8:672–695
Šprlák M, Novák P (2014) Integral transformations of gradiometric data onto a GRACE type of observable. J Geodesy 88:377–390. doi:10.1007/s00190-013-0689-1
Šprlák M, Sebera J, Vaľko M, Novák P (2014) Spherical integral formulas for upward/downward continuation of gravitational gradients onto gravitational gradients. J Geodesy 88:179–197
Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09607
Thalhammer M (1995) Regionale Gravitationsfeldbestimmung mit zukünftigen Satellitenmissionen (SST und Gradiometrie). Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Nr. 437, München
Tóth G (2003) The Eötvös spherical horizontal gradiometric boundary value problem-gravity anomalies from gravity gradients of the torsion balance. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and geoid 2002, 3rd meeting of the IGGC, Ziti Editions, pp 102–107
Tóth G, Rózsa S, Ádám J, Tziavos IN (2002) Gravity field modeling by torsion balance data-a case study in Hungary. In: Ádám J, Schwarz KP (eds) Vistas for geodesy in the new millenium, IAG symposia series 125. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–198
Tóth G, Ádám J, Földváry L, Tziavos IN, Denker H (2005) Calibration/validation of GOCE data by terrestrial torsion balance observations. In: Sansó F (ed) A window on the future geodesy, IAG symposia series 128. Springer, Berlin, pp 214–219
Tóth G, Földváry L, Tziavos IN, Ádám J (2006) Upward/downward continuation of gravity gradients for precise geoid determination. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 41:21–30
van Gelderen M, Rummel R (2001) The solution of the general geodetic boundary value problem by least squares. J Geodesy 75:1–11
van Gelderen M, Rummel R (2002) Corrections to “The solution of the general geodetic boundary value problem by least squares”. J Geodesy 76:121–122
Vening-Meinesz FA (1928) A formula expressing the deflection of the plumb-lines in the gravity anomalies and some formulae for the gravity field and the gravity potential outside the geoid. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen 31:315–331
Winch DE, Roberts PH (1995) Derivatives of addition theorem for Legendre functions. J Aust Math Soc Ser B Appl Math 37:212–234
Wolf KI (2007) Kombination globaler Potentialmodelle mit terrestrische Schweredaten für die Berechnung der zweiten Ableitungen des Gravitationspotentials in Satelitenbahnhöhe. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Nr. 603, München, Germany
Wolf KI, Denker H (2005) Upward continuation of ground data for GOCE calibration. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions, IAG symposia series 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 60–65
Zhu J, Jekeli C (2009) Gravity gradient modeling using gravity and DEM. J Geodesy 83:557–567
Acknowledgments
Michal Šprlák was supported by the project EXLIZ—CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0013, which is co-financed by the European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic. Pavel Novák was supported by the project 209/12/1929 of the Czech Science Foundation. Thoughtful and constructive comments of three anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also extended to the editor-in-chief Roland Klees and the responsible editor Christopher Jekeli for handling our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
A: Application of differential operators on a multiplication of two functions
In this appendix we demonstrate application of the differential operators, which relate the principal components of the deflection of the vertical to SST data or GGs, on a multiplication of two functions. Suppose two general functions \(f = f(\varphi , \lambda , \varphi ', \lambda ')\) and \(h = h(r, \varphi , \lambda , R, \varphi ', \lambda ')\). Applying either the differential operator of Eq. (15) or (17) on multiplication of the functions \(f\) and \(h\) yields
Applying the differential operators of Eqs. (40–45) on multiplication of the functions \(f\) and \(h\) results in
B: Additional terms from application of differential operators on multiplication of two functions
We now focus on an explicit expressions of the additional terms, i.e., the last terms in Eqs. (91–95). Suppose that the function h is parametrized in terms of substitutions \(t\) and \(u\), i.e., \(h = h(t,u)\). Two forms of the function \(f\) are of particular interest:
-
1.
\(f = \cos \alpha '\), then the additional terms are:
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{2}{r^2}\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \varphi }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \varphi }\ =\ -\ \frac{t^2 \sin \alpha ' \sin 2 \alpha }{R^2}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial u}, \end{aligned}$$(97)$$\begin{aligned}&\quad -\ \frac{1}{r^2 \cos \varphi }\ \left( \ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \varphi }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \lambda }\ +\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \varphi }\ \right) \ \nonumber \\&\quad =\ -\ \frac{t^2 \sin \alpha ' \cos 2 \alpha }{R^2}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial u}, \end{aligned}$$(98)$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{1}{r}\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \varphi }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial r}\ =\ \frac{t^3 \sin \alpha ' \sin \alpha }{R^2 \sqrt{1 - u^2}}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial t}, \end{aligned}$$(99)$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{2}{r^2 \cos ^2 \varphi }\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \lambda }\ =\ \frac{t^2 \sin \alpha ' \sin 2 \alpha }{R^2}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial u}, \end{aligned}$$(100)$$\begin{aligned}&-\ \frac{1}{r \cos \varphi }\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial r}\ =\ \frac{t^3 \sin \alpha ' \cos \alpha }{R^2 \sqrt{1 - u^2}}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial t}. \end{aligned}$$(101) -
2.
\(f = \sin \alpha '\), then the additional terms are:
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{2}{r^2}\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \varphi }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \varphi }\ =\ \frac{t^2 \cos \alpha ' \sin 2 \alpha }{R^2}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial u}, \end{aligned}$$(102)$$\begin{aligned}&- \frac{1}{r^2 \cos \varphi }\ \left( \ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \varphi }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \lambda }\ +\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \varphi }\ \right) \ \nonumber \\&\quad = \frac{t^2 \cos \alpha ' \cos 2 \alpha }{R^2}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial u}, \end{aligned}$$(103)$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{1}{r}\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \varphi }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial r}\ =\ -\ \frac{t^3 \cos \alpha ' \sin \alpha }{R^2 \sqrt{1 - u^2}}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial t}, \end{aligned}$$(104)$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{2}{r^2 \cos ^2 \varphi }\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial \lambda }\ =\ -\ \frac{t^2 \cos \alpha ' \sin 2 \alpha }{R^2}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial u}, \end{aligned}$$(105)$$\begin{aligned}&-\ \frac{1}{r \cos \varphi }\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda }\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial r}\ =\ -\ \frac{t^3 \cos \alpha ' \cos \alpha }{R^2 \sqrt{1 - u^2}}\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial t}. \end{aligned}$$(106)
C: Application of differential operators on \(\cos \alpha '\) and \(\sin \alpha '\)
To derive the integral formula transforming the principal components of the deflection of the vertical onto SST data, application of the differential operators of Eqs. (5) and (16) to \(\cos \alpha '\) and \(\sin \alpha '\) is required. The explicit expressions are of the form, see, e.g., (Winch and Roberts 1995),
For the mathematical derivations associated to ITs of the principal components of the deflection of the vertical onto GGs, we need also expressions originating from the application of the differential operators \({\mathcal {D}}^{xx}\), \({\mathcal {D}}^{xy}\), \({\mathcal {D}}^{xz}\), \({\mathcal {D}}^{yy}\) and \({\mathcal {D}}^{yz}\) on \(\cos \alpha '\) and \(\sin \alpha '\). These expressions have the form:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šprlák, M., Novák, P. Integral transformations of deflections of the vertical onto satellite-to-satellite tracking and gradiometric data. J Geod 88, 643–657 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0711-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0711-2