Skip to main content
Log in

Computed success rates of various carrier phase integer estimation solutions and their comparison with statistical success rates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success rate of carrier phase ambiguity resolution (AR) is the probability that the ambiguities are successfully fixed to their correct integer values. In existing works, an exact success rate formula for integer bootstrapping estimator has been used as a sharp lower bound for the integer least squares (ILS) success rate. Rigorous computation of success rate for the more general ILS solutions has been considered difficult, because of complexity of the ILS ambiguity pull-in region and computational load of the integration of the multivariate probability density function. Contributions of this work are twofold. First, the pull-in region mathematically expressed as the vertices of a polyhedron is represented by a multi-dimensional grid, at which the cumulative probability can be integrated with the multivariate normal cumulative density function (mvncdf) available in Matlab. The bivariate case is studied where the pull-region is usually defined as a hexagon and the probability is easily obtained using mvncdf at all the grid points within the convex polygon. Second, the paper compares the computed integer rounding and integer bootstrapping success rates, lower and upper bounds of the ILS success rates to the actual ILS AR success rates obtained from a 24 h GPS data set for a 21 km baseline. The results demonstrate that the upper bound probability of the ILS AR probability given in the existing literatures agrees with the actual ILS success rate well, although the success rate computed with integer bootstrapping method is a quite sharp approximation to the actual ILS success rate. The results also show that variations or uncertainty of the unit–weight variance estimates from epoch to epoch will affect the computed success rates from different methods significantly, thus deserving more attentions in order to obtain useful success probability predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blewitt G (1989) Carrier-phase ambiguity resolution for the Global Positioning System applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res 94(B8): 10187–10203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94: 3949–3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y (2008) GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution using ionosphere-reduced virtual signals. J Geod 82(12): 847–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Rizos C (2009) Network-based geometry-free three carrier ambiguity resolution and phase bias calibration. GPS Solut 13(1): 43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Li B (2009) Three carrier ambiguity resolutions: generalised problems, models and solutions. J Glob Position Syst 8(2): 115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genz A, Bretz F (1999) Numerical computation of multivariate t probabilities with application to power calculation of multiple contrasts. J Stat Comput Simul 63: 361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genz A, Bretz F (2002) Comparison of methods for the computation of multivariate probabilities. J Comput Graph Stat 11(4): 950–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch R (1990) Instantaneous ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of KIS’90, Banff, Canada, September 10–13, pp 299–308

  • Hassibi A, Boyd S (1996) Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, pp 3245–3251

  • Hassibi A, Boyd A (1998) Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS. IEEE Trans Signal Process 46(11): 2938–2952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Shen Y, Xu P (2008) Assessment of stochastic models for GPS measurements with different types of receivers. Chi Sci Bull 53(20): 3219–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Feng Y, Shen Y (2010) Three carrier ambiguity resolution: distance-independent performance demonstrated using semi-generated triple frequency GPS signals. GPS Solut 14(2): 177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe K, Julien O, Cannon ME, Lachapelle G (2006) Availability, accuracy, reliability, and carrier-phase ambiguity resolution with Galileo and GPS. Acta Astronaut 58(8): 422–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe K, Petovello M, Lachapelle G, Cannon ME (2007) Assessing probability of correct ambiguity resolution in the presence of time-correlated errors. Navigation 53(4): 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Kim I, Lee J, Jee G (1996) Efficient ambiguity resolution using constraint equation. In: IEEE PLANS, Position Location and Navigation Symposium, Atlanta, GA, USA, April 22–26, pp 277–284

  • Shannon CE (1959) Probability of error for optimal codes in a Gaussian channel. Bell Syst Tech J 38: 611–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1993) Least-squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities, vol. 6, LGR-Series. Delft Univ. Tech., Delft Geodetic Computing Centre, Delft, pp 59–74

  • Teunissen P (1997) A canonical theory for short GPS baselines, Part I: the baseline precision. J Geod 71: 320–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1998) Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping. J Geod 72: 606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1999) A optimal property of the integer least-squares estimator. J Geod 73: 587–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (2000) The success rate and precision of GPS ambiguities. J Geod 74(3): 321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (2001) Integer estimation in the presence of biases. J Geod 75: 399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen S (2005) On the reliability of integer ambiguity resolution. Navigation 52(2): 98–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen S (2003) On the approximation of the integer least-squares success rate: which lower or upper bound to use. J Glob Position Syst 2: 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P (2001) Random simulation and decorrelation phase ambiguities. J Geod 75: 408–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P (2003) Voronoi cells, probabilistic bounds and hypothesis testing in mixed integer linear models, Paper presented at IUGG 2003 in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, June 30–July 11

  • Xu P (2006) Voronoi cells, probabilistic bounds and hypothesis testing in mixed integer linear models. IEEE Trans Info Theory 52(2): 3122–3138

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanming Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Wang, J. Computed success rates of various carrier phase integer estimation solutions and their comparison with statistical success rates. J Geod 85, 93–103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0418-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0418-y

Keywords

Navigation