Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of errors in polar motion and nutation on UT1 determinations from VLBI Intensive observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The earth’s phase of rotation, expressed as Universal Time UT1, is the most variable component of the earth’s rotation. Continuous monitoring of this quantity is realised through daily single-baseline VLBI observations which are interleaved with VLBI network observations. The accuracy of these single-baseline observations is established mainly through statistically determined standard deviations of the adjustment process although the results of these measurements are prone to systematic errors. The two major effects are caused by inaccuracies in the polar motion and nutation angles introduced as a priori values which propagate into the UT1 results. In this paper, we analyse the transfer of these components into UT1 depending on the two VLBI baselines being used for short duration UT1 monitoring. We develop transfer functions of the errors in polar motion and nutation into the UT1 estimates. Maximum values reach 30 [μs per milliarcsecond] which is quite large considering that observations of nutation offsets w.r.t. the state-of-the-art nutation model show deviations of as much as one milliarcsecond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eubanks M, Archinal BA, Carter MS, Josties FJ, Matsakis DN, McCarthy DD (1994) Earth orientation results from US Naval Observatory VLBI program. IERS Technical Note 17, Observatoire de Paris R65–R79

  • Hefty J, Gontier A-M (1997) Sensitivity of UT1 determined single-baseline VLBI to atmospheric delay model, terrestrial and celestial reference frames. J Geod 71: 253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitz S (1976) Mathematische Modelle der geodätischen Astronomie; Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe A, No. 85, Verlag des Instituts für Angewandte Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main

  • Herring TA (1996) The IERS 1996 theory of precession/nutation. In: McCarthy DD (ed.) IERS Conventions (1996), IERS Technical Note 21, Observatoire de Paris, pp 25–32

  • IVS (2007a) Analysis coordinator of the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry, http://vlbi.geod.uni-bonn.de/IVS-AC/index.html (accessed 01.03.2007)

  • IVS (2007b) International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry, products, http://ivscc.gsfc.nasa.gov (accessed 01.06.2007)

  • Ma C, Sauber JM, Bell LJ, Clark TA, Gordon D, Himwich WE (1990) Measurement of horizontal motions in Alaska using very long baseline interferometry. J Geophys Res 95: 21991–22011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews PM, Herring TA, Buffet BA (2002) Modeling of nutation-precession: new nutation series for the non-rigid Earth, and insights into the Earth’s interior. J Geophys Res 107(B4), doi:10.1029/2001JB000390

  • Mueller I (1969) Spherical and practical astronomy as applied to geodesy. Frederick Ungar Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray JR, Carter WE, Robertson DS (1995) Assessment of the accuracy of IRIS Intensive daily UT1 determination. J Geophys Res 100(B5): 8193–8200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DS, Carter WE, Campbell J, Schuh H (1985) Daily Earth rotation determinations from IRIS very long baseline interferometry. Nature 316(6027): 424–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter W, Behrend D (2007) The international VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry (IVS): current capabilities and future prospects. J Geod 81(6–8): 379–387, doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0131-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaller D, Krügel M, Rothacher M, Tesmer V, Schmid R, Angermann D (2007) Combined Earth orientation parameters based on homogeneous and continuous VLBI and GPS data. J Geod 81(6–8): 529–541, doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0115-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titov O (2000) Influence of adopted nutation model on VLBI NEOS-intensives analysis. Proceedings of the IAU colloquium 180, Towards models and constants for sub-microarcsecond astrometry, 27–30 March 2000, US Naval Observatory, Washington, DC

  • Wahr JM (1981) The forced nutations of an elliptical, rotating, elastic and oceanless earth. Geophys J R Astron Soc 64: 705–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S-Y, Mueller II (1983) Effects of adopting new precession, nutation and equinox corrections on the terrestrial reference frame. Bulletin Géodésique 57: 29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Nothnagel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nothnagel, A., Schnell, D. The impact of errors in polar motion and nutation on UT1 determinations from VLBI Intensive observations. J Geod 82, 863–869 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0212-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0212-2

Keywords

Navigation