Abstract
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, a technological change took place in geodetic astronomy by the development of Digital Zenith Camera Systems (DZCS). Such instruments provide vertical deflection data at an angular accuracy level of 0.̋1 and better. Recently, DZCS have been employed for the collection of dense sets of astrogeodetic vertical deflection data in several test areas in Germany with high-resolution digital terrain model (DTM) data (10–50 m resolution) available. These considerable advancements motivate a new analysis of the method of astronomical-topographic levelling, which uses DTM data for the interpolation between the astrogeodetic stations. We present and analyse a least-squares collocation technique that uses DTM data for the accurate interpolation of vertical deflection data. The combination of both data sets allows a precise determination of the gravity field along profiles, even in regions with a rugged topography. The accuracy of the method is studied with particular attention on the density of astrogeodetic stations. The error propagation rule of astronomical levelling is empirically derived. It accounts for the signal omission that increases with the station spacing. In a test area located in the German Alps, the method was successfully applied to the determination of a quasigeoid profile of 23 km length. For a station spacing from a few 100 m to about 2 km, the accuracy of the quasigeoid was found to be about 1–2 mm, which corresponds to a relative accuracy of about 0.05−0.1 ppm. Application examples are given, such as the local and regional validation of gravity field models computed from gravimetric data and the economic gravity field determination in geodetically less covered regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boedecker G (1976) Astrogravimetrisch-topographisches Nivellement. Wiss. Arb. Lehrst. Geod. Phot. u Kart. TU Hannover Nr. 64
Bomford G (1980) Geodesy, Fourth edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bosch W, Wolf H (1974) Über die Wirkung von topographischen Lokal-Effekten bei profilweisen Lotabweichungs-Prädiktionen. Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Theoretische Geodäsie der Universität Bonn Nr. 28
Bürki B (1989) Integrale Schwerefeldbestimmung in der Ivrea-Zone und deren geophysikalische Interpretation. Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, Nr. 40. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission
Bürki B, Müller A, Kahle H-G (2004) DIADEM: the new digital astronomical deflection measuring system for high-precision measurements of deflections of the vertical at ETH Zurich. Electronic Proc. IAG GGSM2004 meeting in Porto, Portugal. Published also in: CHGeoid 2003, Report 03-33 A Marti U et al. (ed), Bundesamt für Landestopographie (swisstopo), Wabern, Schweiz
Campbell J (1971) Eine Erweiterung der Theorie des astronomischen Nivellements bei Einbeziehung von Schweremessungen. Wiss. Arb. Lehrst. Geod. Phot. u. Kart. TU Hannover Nr. 49
Elmiger A (1969) Studien über Berechnung von Lotabweichungen aus Massen, Interpolation von Lotabweichungen und Geoidbestimmung in der Schweiz. Mitt. Inst. Geod. Phot. ETH Zürich Nr. 12
Flury J (2002) Schwerefeldfunktionale im Gebirge—Modellierungsgenauigkeit, Messpunktdichte und Darstellungsfehler am Beispiel des Testnetzes Estergebirge. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission C 557
Flury J (2006) Short wavelength spectral properties of gravity field quantities. J Geod 79(10-11):624–640. doi: 10.1007/s00190-005-0011-y
Flury J, Gerlach C, Hirt C, Schirmer U (2006) Heights in the Bavarian Alps: mutual validation of GPS, levelling, gravimetric and astrogeodetic quasigeoids. Proc. Geodetic Reference Frames 2006, submitted
Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (1981) The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation. J Geophys Res 86(B9):7843–7854
Galle A (1914) Das Geoid im Harz. Königl. Preuß. Geod. Inst. Nr 61. Berlin
GOCE GRAND (2005) GOCE-Graviationsfeldanalyse Deutschland II. Joint Proposal to BMBF research theme 2 Rummel R et al. (ed) Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie, TU Munich
Gurtner W (1978) Das Geoid der Schweiz. Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, Nr. 32. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Heitz S (1968) Geoidbestimmung durch Interpolation nach kleinsten Quadraten aufgrund gemessener und interpolierter Lotabweichungen. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission C 124
Helmert FR (1880/1884) Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorien der höheren Geodäsie. Teubner, Leibzig (reprint Minerva, Frankfurt a.M. 1961)
Helmert FR (1901) Zur Bestimmung kleiner Flächenstücke des Geoids aus Lotabweichungen mit Rücksicht auf Lotkrümmung. Sitzungsberichte Königl. Preuß. Akad. der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. 2. Mitteilung:958–975
Hirt C (2004) Entwicklung und Erprobung eines digitalen Zenitkamerasystems für die hochpräzise Lotabweichungsbestimmung. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Geodäsie und Geoinformatik an der Universität Hannover Nr 253. http://edok01. tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01dh04/393223965.pdf
Hirt C (2006) Monitoring and analysis of anomalous refraction using a digital zenith camera system. Astron Astrophys 459:283–290. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065485
Hirt C, Bürki B (2002) The digital zenith camera—a new high-precision and economic astrogeodetic observation system for real-time measurement of deflections of the vertical. In: Tziavos I (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd meeting of the international gravity and geoid commission of the international association of geodesy, Thessaloniki 161–166
Hirt C, Seeber G (2005) High-resolution local gravity field determination at the sub-millimeter level using a digital zenith camera system. Dynamic Planet, Cairns 2005, Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) IAG Symposia 130:316–321
Hirt C, Denker H, Flury J, Lindau A, Seeber G (2006) Astrogeodetic validation of gravimetric quasigeoid models in the German Alps—first results. Accepted paper presented at 1. Meeting of the International Gravity Field Service, Istanbul
Høg E, Fabricius C, Makarov VV, Urban S, Corbin T, Wycoff G, Bastian U, Schwekendiek P, Wicenec A (2000) The Tycho-2 catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars. Astron Astrophys 355:L27–L30
Jekeli C (1999) An analysis of vertical deflections derived from high-degree spherical harmonic models. J Geod 73(1):10–22 doi: 10.1007/s001900050213
Jekeli C, Li X (2006) INS/GPS vector gravimetry along roads in Western Montana. OSU Report 477
Kobold F (1957) Die astronomischen Nivellemente in der Schweiz. ZfV 82(4):97–103
Levallois JJ, Monge H (1978) Le geoid Européen, version 1978. Proceedings of the International Sympoium on the Geoid in Europe and the Mediterranean Area, Ancona, 1978:153–164
Mader K (1951) Das Newtonsche Raumpotential prismatischer Körper und seine Ableitungen bis zur dritten Ordnung. Öst Z Vermess Sonderheft 11
Marti U (1997) Geoid der Schweiz 1997. Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz Nr. 56. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission
Meier HK (1956) Über die Berechnung von Lotabweichungen für Aufpunkte im Hochgebirge. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission C 16
Molodenski MS, Eremeev VF, Yurkina MI (1962) Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. Translated from Russian (1960) Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd, Jerusalem
Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Wichmann Karlsruhe
Moritz H (1983) Local geoid determination in mountain regions. OSU Report 352
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geod 74(7-8):552–560. doi: 10.1007/s001900000116
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2002) Erratum: corrections to “The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism”. J Geod 76(8):475–475. doi: 10.1007/s00190-002-0264-7
Niethammer T (1932) Nivellement und Schwere als Mittel zur Berechnung wahrer Meereshöhen. Astronomisch geodätische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, Nr 20. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission
Petrović, S. (1996) Determination of the potential of homogeneous polyhedral bodies using line integrals. J Geod 71 (1):44–52. doi: 10.1007/s001900050074
Tenzer R, Vanícek P, Santos M, Featherstone WE, Kuhn M (2005) The rigorous determination of orthometric heights. J Geod 79(1–3):82–92. doi: 10.1007/s00190-005-0445-2
Torge W (2001) Geodesy, Third edn. W. de Gruyter, Berlin
Tsoulis D (1999) Analytical and numerical methods in gravity field modelling of ideal and real masses. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission C 510
Tsoulis D (2001) Terrain correction computations for a densely sampled DTM in the Bavarian Alps. J Geod 75(5-6):291–307. doi: 10.1007/s001900100176
Zacharias N, Zacharias, MI, Urban SE, Høg E (2000) Comparing Tycho-2 astrometry with UCAC1. Astron J 120:1148–1152
Zacharias N, Urban SE, Zacharias MI, Wycoff GL, Hall DM, Monet DG, Rafferty TJ (2004) The second US naval observatory CCD astrograph catalog (UCAC2). Astron J 127:3043–3059
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirt, C., Flury, J. Astronomical-topographic levelling using high-precision astrogeodetic vertical deflections and digital terrain model data. J Geod 82, 231–248 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0173-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0173-x