Skip to main content
Log in

Core and periphery dynamics of budget evaluation during crisis: the evolution of an impromptu solution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Management Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accounting literature has highlighted the role of budgeting practices in steering organisations through periods of crisis. This paper adds to this literature by drawing attention to the core and periphery dimensions of crisis-related budgetary performance evaluation. Our analysis focuses on a public hospital (periphery) operating under the guidance of a national board of management (core) during an economic and fiscal crisis, which triggered a sudden and substantial reduction in hospital funding and a significant increase in the demand for services. Exploring the role of budgetary practices in this multi-tiered setting, we identify a crisis response where budgetary evaluation was prioritised at both core and periphery levels. Examining the core and periphery separately, we observe an intensified evaluative approach at the core which triggers at the periphery an approach which placed boundaries around organisational activities via the centralisation of expenditure decisions. This response—which we identify as being an impromptu solution—may have been considered sub-optimal at the time but in fact enabled budget compliance and increased service provision. Our analysis highlights the importance of budgetary practices for facilitating value alignment among key stakeholders in times of crisis. In particular, the paper advances a perspective which suggests that divergence in how core and periphery management evaluate budget performance can enable more to be done with less in crisis periods. Overall, these findings have implications for the operation of budgetary practices in response to crises, especially in multi-tiered decision-making contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We assert that this situation can be characterised as a crisis, not only due to the extreme intensity of the budget reduction targets being imposed but also because of the close scrutiny from the media, government, and the international community, primarily due to the nature of the IMF bailout (Fink, 1986). Furthermore, this situation had the potential to inflict significant harm on the national economy. Failure to meet budget reduction targets not only jeopardised the availability of funds but also impeded the country's ability to exit the IMF Program (Kahn, 2013; King, 2002).

  2. We use the term 'economic and fiscal crises' to refer to the global financial crisis and credit crunch that began in 2008 and triggered economic and fiscal austerity pressures across most OECD countries over the course of several years. While many OECD countries have experienced persistent financial deficits since the 1970s, the scope and scale of the economic crisis and its impact on the public sector have been described as the most severe since the 1930s, akin to the Great Depression (Cohen et al., 2015).

References

  • Abernethy, M. A., Chua, W. F., Grafton, J., & Mahama, H. (2006). Accounting and control in health care: Behavioural, organisational, sociological, and critical perspectives. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 2, 805–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy, M. A., & Vagnoni, E. (2004). Power, organisation design and managerial behaviour. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 29(3–4), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, T., & Dent, J. F. (1998). Accounting and organisations: Realising the richness of field research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anessi-Pessina, E., Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Public sector budgeting: A European review of accounting and public management journals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29, 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, P. J. (2009). Global financial crisis: The challenge to accounting research. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 34, 803–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, P. A. (2018). Clarifying what we are about and where we are going. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, T. F., McDonagh, P., & Granleese, J. (1992). The contagion effect in performance evaluation: Evidence from the evaluations of marketing managers. The British Accounting Review, 24(4), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. D. (2014). When organisations deinstitutionalise control practices: A multiple-case study of budget abandonment. European Accounting Review, 23(4), 593–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. D., Mahlendorf, M. D., Schäffer, U., & Thaten, M. (2016). Budgeting in times of economic crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1489–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, D. S., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2022). Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic. Accounting, Organisations & Society, 101, 346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracci, E., Humphrey, C., Moll, J., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Public sector accounting, accountability, and austerity: More than balancing the books? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(6), 878–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, S., Thomas, S., Barry, S., & Keegan, C. (2014). Indicators of health system coverage and activity in Ireland during the economic crisis 2008–2014—From ‘more with less’ to ‘less with less.’ Health Policy, 117(3), 275–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinaels, E., & Soderstrom, N. (2013). Managing in a complex world: Accounting and governance choices in hospitals. European Accounting Review, 22(4), 647–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Wall, M., Iredahl, A., Kraus, K., & Wiklund, M. (2021). The role of management controls in managing heterogeneous interests during extreme situations: The Swedish migrant crisis in 2015. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 18(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., & Beck, M. P. (2020). Clinician responses to management control: Case evidence from a university hospital during the fiscal crisis. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., & Beck, M. (2022). Accounting practices and professional power dynamics during a crisis. The British Accounting Review.

  • Clarke, A. E. (2007). Grounded theory: Critiques, debates, and situational analysis. The SAGE handbook of social science methodology, 423–442.

  • Cohen, S., Guillamón, M. D., Lapsley, I., & Robbins, G. (2015). Accounting for austerity: the Troika in the Eurozone. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(6), 966–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colignon, R., & Covaleski, M. (1988). An examination of managerial accounting practices as a process of mutual adjustment. Accounting, Organisations & Society, 13(6), 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F., Holzmann, O., & Mendoza, R. (1997). Strategy, budgeting, and crisis in Latin America. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 22(7), 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Finance. (2010). The national recovery plan 2011–2014. Stationery Office, Dublin.

  • Eldenburg, L., Soderstrom, N., Willis, V., & Wu, A. (2010). Behavioural changes following the collaborative development of an accounting information system. Accounting, Organisations & Society, 35(2), 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldenburg, L., & Krishnan, R. (2006). Management accounting and control in health care: An economics perspective. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 2, 859–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans L. C. (1996) An examination of the expectations between core and periphery workers. Unpublished PhD thesis, Iowa State University, Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 11146 https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-10248

  • Ezzamel, M., & Bourn, M. (1990). The roles of accounting information systems in an organisation experiencing financial crisis. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 15(5), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, S., & American Management Association. (1986). Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable. Amacom.

  • Gibbs, R., Carr, M., Mulcahy, M., & Walshe, D. (2023). Healthcare budgeting for cyclicality: Structured literature review of accounting, public administration, and health management. Public Money & Management, 1–9.

  • Hartmann, F. G. (2000). The appropriateness of RAPM: Toward the further development of theory. Accounting, Organisations & Society, 25(4–5), 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 34(3–4), 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2010). Ireland. IMF country report, No. 10/366. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2010/cr10366.pdf

  • Janke, R., Mahlendorf, M. D., & Weber, J. (2014). An exploratory study of the reciprocal relationship between interactive use of management control systems and perception of negative external crisis effects. Management Accounting Research, 25(4), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. A., & Dewing, I. P. (1997). The attitudes of NHS clinicians and medical managers towards changes in accounting controls. Financial Accountability & Management, 13(3), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A., Barton, M. A., & Fellows, S. (2013). Organisational crises and the disturbance of relational systems. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastberg, G., & Siverbo, S. (2016). The role of management accounting and control in making professional organisations horizontal. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(3), 428–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenno, S. A., & Free, C. (2018). Fostering and forcing uses of accounting: Labour-management negotiations in the automotive crisis in Canada 2008–2009. Management Accounting Research, 39, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G. (2002). Crisis management & team effectiveness: A closer examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Clarkson, P. (2015). Management control system design, ownership, and performance in professional service organisations. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 45, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurunmäki, L. (1999). Professional vs financial capital in the field of healthcare struggles for the redistribution of power and control. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 24(2), 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurunmäki, L. (2004). A hybrid profession—The acquisition of management accounting expertise by medical professionals. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 29(3–4), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurunmäki, L., Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2023). Economising failure and assembling a failure regime. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kober, R., & Thambar, P. J. (2023). Coordination in a not-for-profit organisation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Organisational sensemaking during planning meetings. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(4), 1137–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kober, R., & Thambar, P. J. (2021). Coping with COVID-19: The role of accounting in shaping charities’ financial resilience. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1416–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kober, R., & Thambar, P. J. (2022). Paradoxical tensions of the COVID-19 pandemic: A paradox theory perspective on the role of management control systems in helping organisations survive crises. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(1), 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I., & Oldfield, R. (2001). Transforming the public sector: Management consultants as agents of change. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 523–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S., & Northcott, D. (2005). The average hospital. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 30(6), 555–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 34(8), 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mygiannakis, G., & Jack, L. (2016). Understanding management accounting change using strong structuration frameworks. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(7), 1234–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, C., & Svalander, P. A. (1975). The medical services change over to a poor environment. Unpublished working paper, University of Linkoping.

  • Oppi, C., Campanale, C., Cinquini, L., & Vagnoni, E. (2019). Clinicians and accounting: A systematic review and research directions. Financial Accountability & Management, 35(3), 290–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. H. (2004). Accountancy on the periphery: The profession in Exeter to 1939. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 14(1), 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzini, M. J. (2006). The relation between cost-system design, managers’ evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: An empirical study of US hospitals. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 31(2), 179–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautiainen, A., Mättö, T., Sippola, K., & Pellinen, J. O. (2022). Accounting, microfoundations, hybridization and longitudinal conflict in a Finnish health care organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(3), 863–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (1983). Economy, territory, identity: Politics of West European peripheries. Sage Publications (CA).

  • Saetre, A. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2021). Generating theory by abduction. Academy of Management Review, 46, 684–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargiacomo, M. (2015). Earthquakes, exceptional government, and extraordinary accounting. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 42, 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, P. (1979). Some thoughts on cores and peripheries. Underdeveloped Europe: Studies in core-periphery relations, 35–43.

  • Silverman, D. (2019). Interpreting qualitative data. Interpreting Qualitative Data.

  • Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y., & Lam, H. (2009). The organisational context of professionalism in accounting. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 34(3–4), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solstad, E., Pettersen, I. J., & Robbins, G. (2021). Hospitals as professional organisations and the perception of distances. Financial Accountability & Management, 37(1), 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (2003). Organisations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory (1st ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management accounting research in the wake of the crisis: Some reflections. European Accounting Review, 20(4), 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Carr.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carr, M., Beck, M. Core and periphery dynamics of budget evaluation during crisis: the evolution of an impromptu solution. J Manag Control 34, 411–434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-023-00362-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-023-00362-1

Keywords

Navigation