Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does low-carbon supply chain management reduce greenhouse gas emissions more effectively than existing environmental initiatives? An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturing firms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Management Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The focus of corporate environmental initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has shifted from individual firms to supply chains, and to so-called low-carbon supply chain management (LCSCM). Because LCSCM is a more advanced environmental initiative than existing initiatives, this study empirically analyzes the influence of manufacturing firms’ LCSCM on their carbon productivity through GHG emissions reduction, with consideration given to the influence of environmental management systems (EMSs) as existing environmental initiatives. Our regression results using cross-sectional data on 139 Japanese manufacturing firms listed on the first section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange in 2011 suggest that although improved carbon productivity can only be achieved by firms implementing EMSs, those firms that also implement LCSCM could improve their carbon productivity further. It is also found that implementing LCSCM is not encouraged by EMSs, but rather by environmentally conscious interorganizational management control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Carbon footprint refers to the total amount of GHG emissions directly and indirectly created by an activity or are accumulated over the life stages of a product (Wiedmann and Minx 2008). On the other hand, Scope 3 refers to the total amount of indirect GHG emissions associated with activities conducted outside the boundaries of the firm in the upstream and downstream of the supply chain (Huang et al. 2009; Hillman and Ramaswami 2010).

  2. However, these economic benefits may depend on firm characteristics such as industry classification and position in the supply chain.

  3. https://www.cdp.net/CDPResults/CDP-japan-climate-change-report-2014-english.pdf.

  4. Because there are several other possible drivers of LCSCM and GHG emissions reduction such as firm size and industry classifications, regression analysis that can control their influences is an appropriate method.

References

  • Arimura, T. H., Hibiki, A., & Katayama, H. (2008). Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument?: a case for environmental management systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(3), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimura, T. H., Darnall, N., & Katayama, H. (2011). Is ISO 14001 a gateway to more advanced voluntary action? The case of green supply chain management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(2), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barla, P. (2007). ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information Management, 12(4), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Faruk, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, J., & Fraser, E. D. G. (2008). Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: Identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(3), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Ytterhus, B. (2007). Understanding the relationship between a facility’s environmental and financial performance. In N. Johnstone (Ed.), Environmental policy and corporate behaviour (pp. 213–259). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Handfield, R. (2008). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: Complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Burgos-Jiménez, J., Vázquez-Brust, D., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., & Dijkshoorn, J. (2013). Environmental protection and financial performance: an empirical analysis in Wales. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33(8), 981–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruk, A. C., Lamming, R. C., Cousins, P. D., & Bowen, F. E. (2002). Analyzing, mapping, and managing environmental impacts along supply chains. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(2), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischedick, M., Roy, J., Abdel-Aziz, A., Acquaye, A., Allwood, JM., Ceron, JP., Geng, Y., Kheshgi, H., Lanza, A., Perczyk, D., Price, L., Santalla, E., Sheinbaum, C., Tanaka, K. (2014) Industry. In: O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J.C. Minx (Ed.) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp.739–810

  • Gond, J. P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, P., Sarkis, J., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2008). Environmental management system certification and its influence on corporate practices: Evidence from the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 28(11), 1021–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R., Ragatz, G., Monczka, R., & Peterson, K. (1999). Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review, 42, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green?: an empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatakeda, T., Kokubu, K., Kajiwara, T., & Nishitani, K. (2012). Factors influencing corporate environmental protection activities for greenhouse gas emission reductions: The relationship between environmental and financial performance. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(4), 455–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri, J. F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: the influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. H., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Dick, G. P. M. (2011). ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An international Journal, 12(4), 330–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, T., & Ramaswami, A. (2010). Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight US cities. Environmental science and technology, 44(6), 1902–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2009). Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(22), 8509–8515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC

  • Japanese Ministry of the Environment (2014) The survey of environmental friendly firms 2013 (in Japanese). Japanese Ministry of the Environment

  • Kajiwara, T., & Kokubu, K. (2012). An exploratory examination of drivers of supply chain carbon management: The role of buyer-supplier relationship (in Japanese). Kokumin Keizai Zasshi, 206(4), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Vachon, S. (2003). Evaluation and collaboration in the supply chain: their impact on plant-level environmental investments. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokubu, K., & Shinohara, A. (2012). A case study of the green supply chain: ECO-VC activities in Panasonic (in Japanese). Kokumin Keizai Zasshi, 205(5), 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krut, R., & Gleckman, H. (1998). ISO 14001: A missed opportunity for sustainable global industrial development. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawrocka, D. (2008). Inter-organizational use of EMSs in supply chain management: Some experiences from Poland and Sweden. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(5), 260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikbakhsh, E. (2009). Green supply chain management. In R. Z. Farahani, N. Asgari, & H. Davarzani (Eds.), Supply chain and logistics in national, international and governmental environment (pp. 195–220). Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K. (2009). An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 669–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K. (2010). Demand for ISO 14001 adoption in the global supply chain: an empirical analysis focusing on environmentally conscious markets. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(3), 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K. (2011). An empirical analysis of the effects on firms’ economic performance of implementing environmental management systems. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(4), 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K., Kaneko, S., Fujii, H., & Komatsu, S. (2011). Effects of the reduction of pollution emissions on the economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis focusing on demand and productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(17–18), 1956–1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K., Kaneko, S., Komatsu, S., & Fujii, H. (2014). How does a firm’s management of greenhouse gas emissions influence its economic performance? Analyzing effects through demand and productivity in Japanese manufacturing firms. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(3), 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. (2009). Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(5), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner production, 11(4), 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., & Cordeiro, J. J. (2001). An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(1), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Müller, M., & Rao, P. (2008). Sustainability and supply chain management: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1545–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2010). Shadows and lights of GSCM (Green Supply Chain Management): Determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10–11), 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F., Rizzi, F., Daddi, T., Gusmerotti, N. M., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2014). EMAS and ISO 14001: The differences in effectively improving environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoumy, M., & Vachon, S. (2012). Environmental projects and financial performance: exploring the impact of project characteristics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 26(7), 795–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Mao, Z. (2008). Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1552–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, S. V., Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. In C. C. Pertsova (Ed.), Ecological Economics Research Trends (pp. 1–11). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2014). Inter-firm collaborations on carbon emission reduction within industrial chains in China: Practices, drivers and effects on firms’ performances. Energy Economics, 42, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: Drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(5), 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study presents some of the results of research supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (1E-1106) from the Ministry of Environment, Japan, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 25285138 and (C) 24530561 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimitaka Nishitani.

Appendix: Questionnaire for variables

Appendix: Questionnaire for variables

Official requirements

Does your organization officially require its main suppliers to undertake activities related to environmental conservation and carbon emissions reduction? Please select all items that apply from the following list and tick appropriate boxes.

\( \square \) CO\(_{2}\) reduction

\( \square \) Energy saving

\( \square \) Provision of CO\(_{2}\) emission information in Scopes 1 and 2

\( \square \) Provision of CO\(_{2}\) emission information in materials and parts

Monitoring

Please answer the following questions about your organization’s efforts to reduce carbon emissions in its supply chains. Please circle the appropriate number for each question.

 

Strongly agree

Strongly disagree

1. Does your organization set clear CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction goals in its supply chains?

5

4

3

2

1

2. Does your organization select suppliers with consideration to their CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction?

5

4

3

2

1

3. Does your organization select suppliers who are prepared to cooperate in reducing CO\(_{2}\) emissions in the supply chain?

5

4

3

2

1

4. Does your organization evaluate suppliers’ CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction using specific criteria?

5

4

3

2

1

Indirect support

Please answer the following questions about your organization’s efforts in cooperation with its main suppliers to reduce carbon emissions in its supply chains. Please circle the appropriate number for each question.

 

Strongly agree

Strongly disagree

1. Does your organization hold study groups for CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction with its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

2. Does your organization hold informal gatherings for discussing CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction with its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

3. Does your organization regularly exchange opinions on CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction with its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

4. Does your organization transfer technology for CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction to its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

5. Does your organization provide finance for its suppliers to reduce CO\(_{2}\) emissions?

5

4

3

2

1

6. Does your organization dispatch CO\(_{2 }\) emissions reduction specialists to its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

Direct coordination

Please answer the following questions about your organization’s efforts in cooperation with its main suppliers to reduce carbon emissions in its supply chains. Please circle the appropriate number for each question.

 

Strongly agree

Strongly disagree

1. Does your organization set common goals for CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction with its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

2. Does your organization have a mutual understanding relating to CO\(_{2}\) emissions reduction with its suppliers?

5

4

3

2

1

3. Do your organization and suppliers cooperate in designing ways to reduce CO\(_{2}\) emissions?

5

4

3

2

1

4. Do your organization and suppliers cooperate with secondary suppliers to reduce CO\(_{2}\) emissions?

5

4

3

2

1

Environmental consciousness of purchasing division

Please answer the following questions about the departmental objectives in your organization’s purchasing division. Please circle the appropriate number for each question.

 

Strongly agree

Strongly disagree

1. Is it important for your organization to purchase environmentally conscious products?

5

4

3

2

1

2. Is it important for your organization to reduce CO\(_{2}\) emissions in materials and parts?

5

4

3

2

1

3. Is it important for your organization to reduce suppliers’ CO\(_{2}\) emissions?

5

4

3

2

1

Recognition of environmental policy stringency

Please answer the following question(s) about the environment surrounding your organization regarding carbon emissions reduction. Please circle the appropriate number for each question.

 

Strongly agree

Strongly disagree

1. Are the environmental regulations for the industry that your organization belongs to stricter than those for other industries?

5

4

3

2

1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishitani, K., Kokubu, K. & Kajiwara, T. Does low-carbon supply chain management reduce greenhouse gas emissions more effectively than existing environmental initiatives? An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturing firms. J Manag Control 27, 33–60 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-015-0224-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-015-0224-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation