Skip to main content
Log in

Management control systems: a review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Management Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review analytical conceptualizations of management control systems (MCS) that have been developed in the academic literature. By means of a systematic review (Tranfield et al. in Br. J. Manag. 14: 207–222, 2003), a comprehensive analysis that encompasses both textbook approaches and research papers is provided. As a result, this article presents a landscape of possible MCS understandings. For the selection of textbooks a survey among accounting researchers and a syllabi search were conducted (Hoffjan and Wömpener in Schmalenbach Bus. Rev., 58: 234–258, 2006). Merchant and Van der Stede (Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Harlow, 2003), Anthony and Govindarajan (Management control systems, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2007), and Simons (Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, 2000) as the three top-ranked textbooks were analyzed and used to generate criteria for the subsequent identification of relevant articles. Additional conceptual papers were included in the analysis. Accordingly, this paper contributes to the management control literature by presenting a review of analytical conceptualizations of MCS. In contrast to previous reviews, we compare analytical concepts of MCS at different categories such as definitions, purposes, types, and frameworks. Moreover, our review was conducted in a systematic manner, i.e. it follows a transparent and thorough process and, by doing this, it complements prior not primarily objective reviews. Finally, we outline a map of the fragmented MCS landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An exception is the review by Merchant and Otley (2007), which portrays different MCS concepts. However, they do so in a consecutive manner without explicitly highlighting commonalities and differences of those concepts.

  2. It is worth mentioning that also the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Chicago have contributed to the development of management control. However, the influence of the HBS was more important due to the governmental programs it ran and the success of the textbooks by Anthony. Therefore, we decided to focus only on HBS for the purpose of our paper. For more information about the MIT and University of Chicago’s influence see Zeff (2008).

  3. For a review of management control concepts before 1965 see Bedeian and Giglioni (1974) who trace the development of management control theory to the early 1900s. Similarly, Parker (1986) examines the conceptual development of management control from 1900 until 1979. The evolution of management control from 1908 until 1980 at HBS as well as at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and at the University of Chicago is discussed in a historical study by Zeff (2008). Parker (1986, Appendix A) provides an overview of control-related sections in 21 management accounting texts.

  4. Overviews over the progress in MCS research in the 1970s and 1980s are provided by Machin (1983) and Merchant and Simons (1986). For a review of more current developments in MCS research, see, for instance, Otley et al. (1995), Merchant and Otley (2007) and Berry et al. (2009).

  5. For more information about the Hasselback Directory please visit www.jrhasselback.com or www.hasselback.org.

  6. Due to the history of the topic management control and its roots in accounting, we focus our analysis on accounting academics as they still dominate the teaching of and research on management control systems.

  7. Hoffjan and Wömpener (2006) focused on management accounting lecturers from Germany, UK, USA, Australia, Switzerland, Austria, and Canada since their aim was to a comparative textbook analysis on strategic management accounting. In contrast, we extended the population to individuals in the areas of controllership and cost accounting to account for the broader scope of the term MCS (Merchant and Otley 2007).

  8. For an overview about the given rationales see Appendix D.

  9. We did not use the term “management control” because we realized that many syllabi contain abbreviations or university-specific adaptations to management control. Therefore, we decided to use the broader term “control” in order to capture all relevant syllabi.

  10. For an detailed overview about studies that make a relevant contribution to MCS conceptualization see Appendix C.

  11. Simons’ (2000) textbook is essentially based on his monograph (Simons 1995) that, in turn, elaborates on his conceptual ‘levers of control’ model based upon several empirical studies (Simons 1987, 1990, 1991, 1994). In order to give a comprehensive review of Simons’ model, references are sometimes made to his earlier publications.

  12. This bottom-up perspective has been inspired by Simons’ Ph.D. supervisor Henry Mintzberg, who differentiated between emergent and planned strategies (see Mintzberg and Waters 1985).

  13. Section 5.2.2 elaborates on the different controls proposed by Ouchi (1977, 1979).

  14. Although Speklè (2001) is discussed in Sect. 5.2.2, we excluded his MCS definition here because he only refers to already presented authors such as Ouchi (1979), Flamholtz et al. (1985), and Whitley (1999).

  15. For a more detailed description of the different dimension see Whitley (1999, pp. 509–512).

  16. Please note that the figure just gives some kind of graphical illustration. The distances between the different articles cannot be strictly interpreted in the sense of equidistance to other articles or to the end of the continuum.

References

  • Accounting faculty and research directory (2005–2006). http://www.facultydirectories.com/AtgDir/A2005-2006.pdf.

  • Allen, B. R., Brownlee, R. E., Haskins, M. E., Lynch, L. J., & Rotch, J. W. (2005). Cases in management accounting and control systems (4th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amigoni, F. (1978). Planning management control systems. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 5(3), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. L., & Post, G. V. (2005). Management information systems: solving business problems with information technology (4th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems (12th edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. W. (2003). Management control in nonprofit organizations (7th edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N., Hawkins, D., & Merchant, K. A. (2006). Accounting: texts and cases (12th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, R. S., Matsumura, E. M., & Young, S. M. (2007). Management accounting (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S. (1982). Agency research in managerial accounting: a survey. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1(1), 154–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedeian, A. G., & Giglioni, G. B. (1974). A conspectus of management control theory: 1900–1972. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. J., Broadbent, J., & Otley, D. T. (2005). Management control: theories, issues, and performance (2nd edn.). Houndmills: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: a review of recent literature. The British Accounting Review, 41(1), 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson, M., Löning, H., & Mendoza, C. (2008). Dual use of budgeting in uncertainty contexts: explorative study of senior sales and marketing managers. Cahiers de Recherche. HEC school of management, accounting and control department, Jouy en Josas Cedex.

  • Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance management systems: a conceptual model. Management Accounting Research 20(4), 283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2/3), 127–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. O., & Feltham, G. A. (2008). Economics of accounting: performance evaluation. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial control and the construction of a relevant accounting. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J. S. (2008). Managerial uses of accounting information. Springer series in accounting scholarship (2nd edn.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dorf, R. C., & Bishop, R. H. (2007). Modern control systems (11th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilon, S. (1962). Problems in studying management control. International Journal of Production Research, 1(4), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, C., Merchant, K. A., & Otley, D. T. (1990). Accounting for management control (2nd edn.). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. H. III, Lewis, B. L., & Patton, J. M. (1986). An economic modeling approach to contingency theory and management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(6), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, R., & Wagenhofer, A. (2008). Interne Unternehmensrechnung (7th edn.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. T. (2005). The design and use of management control systems: an extended framework for analysis. SSRN.

  • Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. T. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research 20(4), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. G. (1998). Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: past results and future directions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, E. G. (1979). Toward a psycho-technical systems paradigm of organizational measurement. Decision Sciences, 10(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, E. G. (1983). Accounting, budgeting and control systems in their organizational context: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2–3), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, E. G., Das, T. K., & Tsui, A. S. (1985). Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. E. (1972). The spectrum of management control. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 37(2), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R., Noreen, E., & Brewer, P. (2007). Managerial accounting (12th edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (2005). Managerial accounting: concepts and empirical evidence (6th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herath, S. K. (2007). A framework for management control research. Journal of Management Development, 26(9), 895–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, R. (2008). Managerial accounting: creating value in a dynamic business environment (8th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffjan, A., & Wömpener, A. (2006). Comparative analysis of strategic management accounting in German- and English-language general management accounting textbooks. Schmalenbach Business Review, 58, 234–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1978). The poverty of management control philosophy. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 450–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, T., Northcott, D., & Scapens, R. W. (2007). Issues in management accounting (3rd edn.). Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C. T., Foster, G. T., Datar, S. M., Rajan, M. V., & Ittner, C. (2008a). Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis (13th edn). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebas, M., & Weigenstein, J. (1986). Management control: the roles of rules markets and culture. Journal of Management Studies, 23(3), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. A. (1971). On the idea of a management control system: integrating accounting and management control. Journal of Management Studies, 8(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, J. L. J. (1979). A contingent methodology for management control. Journal of Management Studies, 16(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, J. L. J. (1983). Management control systems: whence and whither? In E. A. Lowe & J. L. J. Machin (Eds.), New perspectives in management control (pp. 22–42). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciariello, J. A., & Kirby, C. J. (1994). Management control systems: using adaptive systems to attain control (2nd edn.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, N. B. (1995). Management accounting and control systems: an organizational and behavioral approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. W., Weil, R. L., & Stickney, C. P. (2007). Managerial accounting: an introduction to concepts, methods, and uses (10th edn.). Mason: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package: opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: how the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. (1989). Rewarding results: motivating profit center managers. Harvard business school series in accounting and control. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. (1997). Modern management control systems. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A., & Otley, D. T. (2007). A review of the literature on control and accountability. In Handbooks of management accounting research (Vol. 2, pp. 785–802). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A., & Simons, R. (1986). Research and control in complex organizations: an overview. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. & Van der Stede, W. A. (2003). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (2nd edn.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. M. III (1986). Management control and decision support systems: an overview. Industrial Management, 28(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, W. A. J., & Burns, J. (2005). Management control in the 21st century. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. T. (1994). Management control in contemporary organizations: towards a wider framework. Management Accounting Research, 5(3–4), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. T. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. T., & Berry, A. J. (1980). Control, organisation and accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(2), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. T., Broadbent, J., & Berry, A. J. (1995). Research in management control: an overview of its development. British Journal of Management, 6(6), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (1986). Developing control concepts in the 20th century. Accounting thought and practice through the years. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoe, K., Corbitt, G., & Boykin, R. (2001). Enterprise integration. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1993). Strategic cost management: the new tool for competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L. (1987). Accounting control systems and business strategy: an empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(4), 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1/2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L. (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L. (1995). Levers of control: how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal (Hardcover). Boston: Harvard Business School Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisaye, S. (1998). An overview of the social and behavioral sciences approaches in management control research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10(11), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., & DeRidder, J. J. (1997). The selection process for accounting textbooks: general criteria and publisher incentives—a survey. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), 367–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2005). Performance measurement and management: a strategic approach to management accounting. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomons, D. (1965). Divisional performance: measurement and control. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speklé, R. F. (2001). Explaining management control structure variety: a transaction cost economics perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(4/5), 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing Evidence-Informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., Liang, T.-P., & Sharda, R. (2008). Decision support and business intelligence systems (8th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancil, R. F. (1973). What kind of management control do you need? Boston: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancil, R. F. (1989). In K. A. Merchant (Ed.), Rewarding results: motivating profit center managers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999). Firms, institutions and management control: the comparative analysis of coordination and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(5/6), 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaleznik, A. (2005). The education of Robert S. McNamara, secretary of defense, 1961–1968. Revue Franc aise de Gestion 2005/6, 159, 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, S. A. (2008). The contribution of the Harvard business school to management control, 1908–1980. Management Accounting Research, 20(s1), 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. L. (2008). Accounting for decision making and control (6th edn.). Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Lukas Goretzki, Maik Hamann, Stephan Kramer, Matthias D. Mahlendorf, Pascal Nevries, Andreas Veit, Elmar Wyszomirski, and Stephen A. Zeff for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The second author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Foundation of German Business (Stiftung der Deutschen Wirtschaft). The responsibility for any errors in the resulting work remains our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Strauß.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 99 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strauß, E., Zecher, C. Management control systems: a review. J Manag Control 23, 233–268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0158-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0158-7

Keywords

Navigation