Skip to main content
Log in

Simplex-like sequential methods for a class of generalized fractional programs

  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sequential method for a class of generalized fractional programming problems is proposed. The considered objective function is the ratio of powers of affine functions and the feasible region is a polyhedron, not necessarily bounded. Theoretical properties of the optimization problem are first established and the maximal domains of pseudoconcavity are characterized. When the objective function is pseudoconcave in the feasible region, the proposed algorithm takes advantage of the nice optimization properties of pseudoconcave functions; the particular structure of the objective function allows to provide a simplex-like algorithm even when the objective function is not pseudoconcave. Computational results validate the nice performance of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cambini A, Martein L (1986) A modified version of Martos’ algorithm. Methods Oper Res 53:33–44

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cambini A, Martein L (1990) Linear Fractional and Bicriteria Linear Fractional Programs. In: Cambini A, Castagnoli E, Martein L, Mazzoleni P, Schaible S (eds) Generalized Convexity and Fractional Programming with Economic Applications, vol 345. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 155–166, ISBN: 0-387-52673-0

  • Cambini A, Martein L (2009) Generalized convexity and optimization: theory and applications, vol 616. Springer, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540-70875-9

  • Cambini R (1994) A class of non-linear programs: theoretical and algorithmical results. In: Komlósi S, Rapcsák T, Schaible S (eds) Generalized convexity, vol 405. Springer, Berlin, pp 294–310, ISBN: 3-540-57624-X

  • Cambini R, Sodini C (2010) A unifying approach to solve some classes of rank-three multiplicative and fractional programs involving linear functions. Eur J Oper Res 207:25–29. ISSN 0377-2217

  • Cambini R, Sodini C (2010) Global optimization of a rank-two nonconvex program. Math Methods Oper Res 71(1):165–180 ISSN: 1432-2994

  • Carosi L, Martein L (2008) A sequential method for a class of pseudoconcave fractional problems. CEJOR 16(2):153–164

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Wu Y, Zhang F, Wang H (2012) A novel fast method for \(L^{\infty }\) problems in multiview geometry. In: Fitzgibbon A, Lazebnik S, Perona P, Sato Y, Schmid C (eds) Proceedings, Part V: 12th European conference on computer vision ECCV 2012, Florence, Italy, October 7–13, 2012, pp 116–129. Springer, Berlin

  • Ellero A (1996) The optimal level solutions method. J Inf Optim Sci 17(2):355–372

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frenk JBG, Schaible S (2005) Fractional programming. In: Hadjisavvas N, Komlósi S, Schaible S (eds) Handbook of generalized convexity and generalized monotonicity. Springer, New York, pp 335–386

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stancu-Minasian IM (1997) Fractional programming theory, methods, and applications. Kluwer, New York, ISBN 978-0-7923-4580-0

  • Stancu-Minasian IM (2006) A sixth bibliography of fractional programming. Optimization 55(4):405–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous referees and Prof. Alberto Cambini for their helpful comments and discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Carosi.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix a detailed description of the algorithm is presented. In particular, the main procedure is aimed to initialize the process and to split the visit of the feasible region with respect to the sign of the linear function \(c^Tx+c_0\). As we need to follow different steps according to the generalized convexity property of f, we will distinguish two subprocedures: Visit1 finds maximum points when f is pseudoconcave, while Visit2 deals with the pseudoconvex case. It’s worth remarking that we consider the case \(\alpha \ne \beta \), since for \(\alpha = \beta \), solution methods have been already proposed (see for instance Cambini and Sodini 2010a).

Denote by \(x_b\) an incumbent maximum point of P and by \(U_b\) the incumbent optimal value of P. Set:

$$\begin{aligned} C_{\max }= & {} \underset{x\in X}{\sup }(c^{T}x+c_{0}) \quad \quad \quad \quad C_{\min }=\underset{x\in X}{\inf }(c^{T}x+c_{0}) \\ \theta _{\min }= & {} \underset{x \in X}{\min \;} (d^Tx+d_0)\quad \quad \quad \quad \theta _{\max }=\underset{x \in X}{\sup \;} d^Tx+d_0 \\ X_{<}= & {} \{x \in X: c^Tx+c_0 < 0\} \end{aligned}$$

We are ready to present the main algorithm and the two subprocedures Visit1 and Visit2; to get them more readable, some comment rows have been added.

figure a
figure b
figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cambini, R., Carosi, L., Martein, L. et al. Simplex-like sequential methods for a class of generalized fractional programs. Math Meth Oper Res 85, 77–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0556-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0556-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation