Skip to main content
Log in

Shortfall risk minimising strategies in the binomial model: characterisation and convergence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we study the dependence on the loss function of the strategy, which minimises the expected shortfall risk when dealing with a financial contingent claim in the particular situation of a binomial model. After having characterised the optimal strategies in the particular cases when the loss function is concave, linear or strictly convex, we analyse how optimal strategies change when we approximate a loss function with a sequence of suitable loss functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cvitanic J (1998) Methods of partial hedging. Asia-Pac Financ Markets 00:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvitanic J (2000) Minimizing expected loss of hedging in incomplete and constrained markets. SIAM J Control Optim 38(4):1050–1066

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cvitanic J, Karatzas I (1999) On dynamic measure of risk. Finance Stoch 3(4):451–482

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cvitanic J, Karatzas I (2001) Generalized Neyman-Pearson lemma via convex duality. Bernoulli 7(1):79–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie D (1999) Dynamic asset pricing theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Favero G (2001) Shortfall risk minimization under model uncertainty in the binomial case: adaptive and robust approaches. Math Meth Oper Res 53:493–503

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Favero G, Vargiolu T (2002) Robustness of shortfall risk minimising strategies in the binomial model. Università degli studi di Padova, Dipartimento di matematica pura e applicata, Preprint n. 14 - 2002. http://www.math.unipd.it/~ favero/workpage.html

  • Föllmer H, Leukert P (2000a) Quantile hedging. Finance Stoch 3: 251–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H, Leukert P (2000b) Efficient hedging: cost versus shortfall risk. Finance Stoch 4:117–146

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stoch 6:429–447

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jouini E, Napp C (2004) Convergence of utility functions and convergence of optimal strategies. Finance Stoch 8(1):133–144

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch M (2001) Efficient hedging in incomplete markets under model uncertainty. Ph.D. Thesis, Humboldt University

  • Pham H (2000) Dynamic L p - hedging in discrete time under cone constraints. SIAM J Control Opt 38:665–682

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Runggaldier WJ, Trivellato B, Vargiolu T (2002) A Bayesian adaptive control approach to risk management in a binomial model. In: Dalang RC, Dozzi M, Russo F (eds) Proceedings of the Ascona 99 seminar on stochastic analysis, random fields and applications. Birkhauser, pp 243–258

  • Schulmerich M, Trautmann S (2003) Local expected shortfall-hedging in discrete time. Eur Finance Rev 7(1):75–102

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gino Favero.

Additional information

The first author accomplished most of this research as a post-doc fellow in the Pure and Applied Mathematics Dept. of Padua University, which is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favero, G., Vargiolu, T. Shortfall risk minimising strategies in the binomial model: characterisation and convergence. Math Meth Oper Res 64, 237–253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-006-0083-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-006-0083-3

Keywords

Navigation