Skip to main content
Log in

The non-emptiness of the core of a partition function form game

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a necessary and sufficient condition for the non-emptiness of the core for partition function form games. We generalize the Bondareva–Shapley condition to partition function form games and present the condition for the non-emptiness of “the pessimistic core”, and “the optimistic core”. The pessimistic (optimistic) core describes the stability in assuming that players in a deviating coalition anticipate the worst (best) reaction from the other players. In addition, we define two other notions of the core based on exogenous partitions. The balanced collections in partition function form games and some economic applications are also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We can have the same discussion under the assumption that \(v^{{\mathcal {P}}^N}(N)\ge \sum _{S\in {\mathcal {P}}}v^{\mathcal {P}}(S)\) for any \({\mathcal {P}}\in \varPi {\setminus }\{{\mathcal {P}}^N\}\).

  2. Hafalir (2007) defined the convexity in PFF and proved that the convexity implies the efficiency of the grand coalition.

  3. The pessimistic core is closely related to the \(\alpha \)-core of Aumann and Peleg (1960) in which the outside players minimize the gain of coalition S.

  4. These cores, \(C^{IEX}\) and \(C^{NEX}\), are closely related to the \(\gamma \) and \(\delta \)-core introduced by Hart and Kurz (1983) and Hart (1984), respectively.

  5. The constraints for \(\varvec{\delta }\) are, in the case of three players, as follows:

    $$\begin{aligned}&\delta ^{\{1,2,3\}}_1+\delta ^{\{1,23\}}_1+\delta ^{\{2,13\}}_{13}+\delta ^{\{3,12\}}_{12}+ \delta ^{{\mathcal {P}}^N}_{N}=1,\\&\delta ^{\{1,2,3\}}_2+\delta ^{\{1,23\}}_{23}+\delta ^{\{2,13\}}_2+\delta ^{\{3,12\}}_{12}+ \delta ^{{\mathcal {P}}^N}_{N}=1,\\&\delta ^{\{1,2,3\}}_3+\delta ^{\{1,23\}}_{23}+\delta ^{\{2,13\}}_{13}+\delta ^{\{3,12\}}_{3}+ \delta ^{{\mathcal {P}}^N}_{N}=1. \end{aligned}$$

    If we take, for example, \(\delta ^{\{3,12\}}_{12}=1/2, \delta ^{\{2,13\}}_{13}=1/2, \delta ^{\{1,23\}}_{23}=1/2\), and for any other \((S,{\mathcal {P}})\), \(\delta ^{{\mathcal {P}}}_{S}=0\), then it satisfies the constraints. However, \(\sum _{S\ne N,\ S\ne \{\emptyset \}}\delta ^{\{S,N{\setminus } S\}}_S=1/2+1/2+1/2=3/2\) is less than that of the construction above, which achieves \(\delta ^{\{1,23\}}_1+\delta ^{\{2,13\}}_2+\delta ^{\{3,12\}}_3=1+1+1=3\).

  6. A partition \({\mathcal {P'}}\) is finer than a partition \({\mathcal {P}}\) if for each coalition \(T'\in {\mathcal {P'}}\), there is a coalition \(T\in {\mathcal {P}}\) such that \(T'\subseteq T\).

References

  • Aumann RJ, Peleg B (1960) Von Neumann-Morgenstern solutions to cooperative games without side payments. Bull Am Math Soc 66:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F, van den Nouweland A (2014) Expectation formation rules and the core of partition function form games. Games Econ Behav 88:339–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Clippel G, Serrano R (2008) Marginal contributions and externalities in the value. Econometrica 76:1413–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funaki Y, Yamato T (1999) The core of an economy with a common pool resource: a partition function form approach. Int J Game Theory 28:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies DB (1959) Solutions to general non-zero-sum games. Contrib Theory Games 4:47–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafalir I (2007) Efficiency in coalition games with externalities. Games Econ Behav 61:242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Kurz M (1983) Endogeneous formation of coalitions. Econometrica 51:1047–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S (1984) Stable coalition structures. In: Holler MJ (ed) Coalitions and Collective Actions. Physica-Verlag, Wuerzburg, pp 235–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kóczy LÁ (2007) A recursive core for partition function form games. Theory Decis 63:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg B, Sudhölter P (2007) Introduction to the theory of cooperative games, Chapter 3, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray D (1989) Credible coalitions and the core. Int J Game Theory 18:185–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D, Vohra R (1999) A theory of endogenous coalition structures. Games Econ Behav 26:286–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrall RM (1961) Generalized characteristic functions for n-person games. In: Proceedings of the Princeton University Conference of Oct, 1961

  • Thrall RM, Lucas WF (1963) n-Person games in partition function form. Nav Res Logist Q 10:281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaaki Abe.

Additional information

The authors thank an anonymous referee and an associate editor for their helpful suggestions and comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abe, T., Funaki, Y. The non-emptiness of the core of a partition function form game. Int J Game Theory 46, 715–736 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-016-0554-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-016-0554-6

Keywords

Navigation