Skip to main content
Log in

On (non-) monotonicity of cooperative solutions

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggregate monotonicity of cooperative solutions is widely accepted as a desirable property, and examples where certain solution concepts (such as the nucleolus) violate this property are scarce and have no economic interpretation. We provide an example of a simple four-player game that points out at a class of economic contexts where aggregate monotonicity is not appealing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apartsin Y, Holzman R (2003) The core and the bargaining set in glove-market games. Int J Game Theory 32: 189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arin J, Feltkamp V (1997) The nucleolus and kernel of veto-rich transferable utility games. Int J Game Theory 26: 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ (2000) Collected papers. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Maschler M (1965) The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Res Logist Q 12: 223–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotte JH (1970) Computation of and observations on the nucleolus and the central games. M.Sc. Thesis, Cornell University

  • Hokari T (2000) The nucleolus is not aggregate-monotonic on the domain of convex games. Int J Game Theory 29: 133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschler M (1992) The bargaining set, kernel, and nucleolus. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 591–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschler M, Peleg B, Shapley L (1971) The kernel and bargaining set for convex games. Int J Game Theory 1: 73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megiddo N (1974) On the nonmonotonicity of the bargaining set, the kernel and the nucleolus of a game. SIAM J Appl Math 27: 355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H, Thomson W (1988) Can everyone benefit from growth? Two difficulties. J Math Econ 17: 339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potters J, Poos R, Tijs S, Muto S (1989) Clan games. Games Econ Behav 1: 275–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D (1969) The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J Appl Math 17: 1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS (1959) The solutions of a symmetric market game. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contributions to the theory of games, vol IV, Annals of mathematics studies 40. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1985) Monotonic solutions of cooperative games. Int J Game Theory 14: 65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP, Okada N, Hashimoto T (1982) Cost allocation in water resources development. Water Resour Res 18: 463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andriy Zapechelnyuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tauman, Y., Zapechelnyuk, A. On (non-) monotonicity of cooperative solutions. Int J Game Theory 39, 171–175 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0196-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0196-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation