Skip to main content
Log in

Class attendance and learning outcome

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents new evidence on the dynamic treatment effects of class attendance on academic performance. The analysis is based on a dataset from a large introductory statistics course and a dynamic modeling framework of Ding and Lehrer (Rev Econ Stat 92(1):31–42, 2010). The course had seven progressive assessments spread across a thirteen-week semester. Assessment test scores were matched to individual student attendance records. We use a panel dataset to study the dynamic interactions over time and between learning activities including lectures and tutorials, while accounting for reverse causality and self-selection without resorting to instruments for attendance or discontinuity design. Class attendance is found to have a test score return rate of 1.3 percentage points per lecture and 1 percentage point per tutorial. For both lecture and tutorial attendances, the contemporaneous effect dominates the lagged effect, with the effects accumulating over time. We also find a substitution rather than complementarity effect between lecture attendance and tutorial attendance, but the former has a stronger effect on test scores than the latter. Our results also show these effects are stronger for under-performing students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As we use quiz 1 as a control for student fixed effects, we only use the attendance for weeks 3–4 to match with the midterm examination.

  2. In the estimation of Eq. (5), the inclusion/exclusion of quiz 1 score as a control for \(v_{i}\) affects the magnitude of coefficients on \(L_{i1}\) and \(T_{i1}\) substantially. This implies that other observed characteristics are quite limited in accounting for student heterogeneity.

  3. The cumulative interactive effect \((\sum _{t=1}^{2}L_{t}+T_{t}+L_{t}T_{t})\) is also smaller than the cumulative effect of lecture attendance \((L_{1}+L_{2})\). We do not pay as much attention to this result because we already know that \(L_{1}\) and \(T_{1}\) do not contribute much to the score of test 2.

References

  • Arulampalam W, Naylor R, Smith J (2012) Am i missing something? the effects of absence from class on student performance. Economics of Education Review 31(4):63–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aucejo EM, Romano TF (2016) Assessing the effect of school days and absences on test score performance. Econ Educ Rev 55(Supplement C):70–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley SJ, Golek JH (2004) Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. Educ Technol Soc 7(4):167–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolic-Zlomislic S, Bates A (1999) Investing in on-line learning: potential benefits and limitations. Can J Commun 24(3)

  • Ben-Porath Y (1967) The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. J Polit Econ 75(4, Part 1):352–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman AE, Murnane RJ (1979) Using panel data to improve estimates of the determinants of educational achievement. Sociol Educ 52(2):113–121

  • Bond TN, Lang K (2013) The evolution of the black–white test score gap in grades k-3: the fragility of results. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1468–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen WG, Chingos MM, Lack KA, Nygren TI (2014) Interactive learning online at public universities: evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. J Policy Anal Manag 33(1):94–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caviglia-Harris JL (2006) Attendance and achievement in economics: investigating the impact of attendance policies and absentee rates on student performance. J Econ Finance Educ 4(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Devadoss S, Foltz J (1996) Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. Am J Agric Econ 78(3):499–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243268. http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/78/3/499.full.pdf+html

  • Ding W, Lehrer SF (2010) Estimating treatment effects from contaminated multiperiod education experiments: the dynamic impacts of class size reductions. Rev Econ Stat 92(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobkin C, Gil R, Marion J (2010) Skipping class in college and exam performance: evidence from a regression discontinuity classroom experiment. Econ Educ Rev 29:566–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kremer M (2008) Using randomization in development economics research: a toolkit. In: Schultz T, Strauss J (eds) Handbook of development economics, chap 61, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3895–3962

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden GC, Ellis LV (1995) The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. Am Econ Rev 85(2):343–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio D, Rush M, Yin L (2013) Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. J Labor Econ 31(4):763–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gump S (2005) The cost of cutting class: attendance as a predictor of success. Coll Teach 53:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6(2):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce TJ, Crockett S, Jaeger DA, Altindag O, O’connell SD, Remler DK (2015) Do students know best? Choice, classroom time, and academic performance (No. w21656). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Kirby A, McElroy B (2003) The effect of attendance on grade for first year economics students in University College Cork. Econ Soc Rev 34(3):311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak DW, Menezes FM, Sherwood C (2015) Assessing the impact of blended learning on student performance. Econ Rec 91(292):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif E, Miles S (2013) Class attendance and academic performance: a panel data analysis. Econ Pap 32(4):470–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2016) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics (No. w21875). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Marburger D (2006) Does mandatory attendance improve student performance? J Econ Educ 37(2):148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins P, Walker I (2006) Student achievement and education production: a case study of the effect of class attendance. IZA DP No 2490

  • Meroni EC, Abbiati G (2016) How do students react to longer instruction time? Evidence from Italy. Educ Econ 24(6):592–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquel R (2003) Identification of effects of dynamic treatments with a difference-in-differences approach. University of St Gallen, Working Paper

  • Olitsky NH, Cosgrove SB (2014) The effect of blended courses on student learning: evidence from introductory economics courses. Int Rev Econ Educ 15(C):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park KH, Kerr PM (1990) Determinants of academic performance: a multinomial logit approach. J Econ Educ 21(2):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano JP, Shaikh AM, Wolf M (2010) Hypothesis testing in econometrics. Annu Rev Econ 2(1):75–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer D (1993) Do students go to class? Should they? J Econ Perspect 7(3):167–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanca L (2006) The effects of attendance on academic performance: panel data evidence for introductory microeconomics. J Econ Educ 37(3):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira A (2016) The impact of class absenteeism on undergraduates’ academic performance: evidence from an elite economics school in Portugal. Innov Educ Teach Int 53(2):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller M (2004) Learning objects and the e-learning cost dilemma. Open Learn 19(3):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Do Won Kwak.

Additional information

We would like to thank the editor, the associate editor and the reviewer for their constructive comments, which have greatly improved the manuscript. We also thank Zi Yin for his excellent research assistance. The research of the first author was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2008-362-A00001).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 118 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwak, D.W., Sherwood, C. & Tang, K.K. Class attendance and learning outcome. Empir Econ 57, 177–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1434-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1434-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation