Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting the direction of US stock markets using industry returns

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the directional predictability of US excess stock market returns by lagged excess returns from industry portfolios and a number of other commonly used variables by means of dynamic probit models. We focus on the directional component of the market returns because, for investment purposes, forecasting the direction of return correctly is presumably more relevant than the accuracy of point forecasts. Our findings suggest that only a small number of industries have predictive power for market returns, meaning that we find little evidence of stock markets reacting with a delay to information contained in industry returns. We also find that the binary response models outperform conventional predictive regressions in forecasting the direction of the market return. Finally, we test trading strategies and find that some of the industry portfolios do contain information that can be used to improve investment returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/index.html.

  2. In Sect. 7 we also study the robustness of our findings using daily frequency data. This data is also obtained from the Kenneth French’s data library.

  3. http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/.

  4. All the other results are available upon request.

  5. Hong et al. (2007) have revised their results to cover the period 1946–2013 in a recent note (2014), available on Rossen Valkanov’s website: http://rady.ucsd.edu/docs/faculty/valkanov/Note_10282014?pdf=Note_10282014. They also report that with a longer sample, fewer industries seem to lead the stock market.

  6. These findings are available upon request.

  7. Findings available by request.

  8. The adjusted pseudo-\(R^2\) receives values that are lower than those of the unadjusted measure, since it includes a term that penalizes for each extra predictor included.

  9. Daily data for the industry REIT were not available, which reduced the number of industries to 33. The nine industries with statistically significant coefficients included MINES, OIL, FOOD, APPRL, PTRLM, METAL, ELCTR, INSTR, and RTAIL. Findings for dynamic probit models (7)–(9) using daily data were similar to the ones obtained using the static probit models, as illustrated in Table 9 for the METAL portfolio.

References

  • Anatolyev S, Gospodinov N (2010) Modeling financial return dynamics via decomposition. J Bus Econ Stat 28:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Thompson SB (2008) Predicting excess returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average? Rev Financ Stud 21:1509–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenesizoglu T, Timmermann A (2012) Do return prediction models add economic value. J Bank Finance 36:2974–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevapatrakul T (2013) Return sign forecasts based on conditional risk: evidence from the UK stock market index. J Bank Finance 37:2342–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffesen PF, Diebold FX (2006) Financial asset returns, direction-of-change forecasting, and volatility dynamics. Manag Sci 52:1273–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole R, Moshirian F, Wu Q (2008) Bank stock returns and economic growth. J Bank Finance 32:995–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrella A (1998) A new measure of fit for equations with dichotomous dependent variables. J Bus Econ Stat 16:198–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (1989) Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 25:23–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French K, Schwert GW, Stambaugh R (1987) Expected stock returns and volatility. J Financ Econ 19:3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal A, Welch I (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Rev Financ Stud 21:1455–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Pesaran MH (2000) Economic and statistical measures of forecast accuracy. J Forec 19:537–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PR, Timmermann A (2012) Choice of sample split in out-of-sample forecast evaluation. European University Institute Working Paper ECO 2010/10

  • Hong H, Stein J (1999) A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading, and overreaction in asset markets. J Financ 54:2143–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Torous W, Valkanov R (2007) Do industries lead stock markets? J Financ Econ 83:367–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi H, Saikkonen P (2008) Predicting U.S. recessions with dynamic binary response models. Rev Econ Stat 90:777–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong A, Rapach D, Strauss J, Zhou G (2011) Predicting market components out of sample: asset allocation implications. J Portf Manag 37:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont O (2001) Economic tracking portfolios. J Econom 105:161–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch G, Tanner E (1991) Economic forecast evaluation: profits versus conventional error measures. Am Econ Rev 81:580–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung MT, Daouk H, Chen A-S (2000) Forecasting stock indices: a comparison of classification and level estimation models. Int J Forec 16:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzly L, Ozbas O (2010) Market segmentation and cross-predictability of returns. J Financ 65:1555–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1981) On market timing and investment performance: an equilibrium theory of value for market forecasters. J Bus 54:363–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz T, Grinblatt M (1999) Do industries explain momentum? J Finance 54:1249–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng ECY (2012) Forecasting US recessions with various risk factors and dynamic probit models. J Macroecon 34:112–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg H (2010) Dynamic probit models and financial variables in recession forecasting. J Forec 29:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg H (2011) Forecasting the direction of the US stock market with dynamic binary probit models. Int J Forec 27:561–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg H (2013) Predicting bear and bull stock markets with dynamic binary time series models. J Bank Financ 37:3351–3363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Timmermann A (1992) A simple nonparametric test of predictive performance. J Bus Econ Stat 10:461–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Timmermann A (2009) Testing dependence among serially correlated multi-category variables. J Am Stat Assoc 485:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pönkä H (2016) Real oil prices and the international sign predictability of stock returns. Financ Res Lett 17:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2016.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapach D, Zhou G (2013) Forecasting stock returns. In: Elliott G, Timmermann A (eds) Handbook of economic forecasting, vol 2A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 328–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizova S (2013) Trade momentum. J Int Finan Mark Inst Money 24:258–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg T, Shephard N (2003) Dynamics of trade-by-trade price movements: decomposition and models. J Financ Econom 1:2–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1966) Mutual fund performance. J Bus 39:119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1994) The Sharpe ratio. J Portf Manag 21:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann A (2008) Elusive return predictability. Int J Forec 24:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Heikki Kauppi, Helinä Laakkonen, Markku Lanne, Matthijs Lof, Henri Nyberg, participants of FDPE Econometrics Workshops I&II 2013 (Helsinki, May and Dec 2013), the GSF and FDPE Winter Research Workshop in Finance (Turku, Nov 2013), and FindEcon’2014 (Lodz, May 2014), the editors, and two anonymous referees for useful comments on the paper. Financial support from the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, the Foundation for the Advancement of Finnish Security Markets, and the Research Funds of the University of Helsinki is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harri Pönkä.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pönkä, H. Predicting the direction of US stock markets using industry returns. Empir Econ 52, 1451–1480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1098-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1098-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation