Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gravity equation has been traditionally used to predict trade flows across countries. However, several problems related with its empirical application still remain unsolved. The unobserved heterogeneity, the presence of heteroskedasticity in trade data or the existence of zero flows, which make the estimation of the logarithm unfeasible, are some of them. This paper provides a survey of the most recent literature concerning the specification and estimation methods of this equation. For a dataset covering 80% of world trade, the most widely extended estimators are compared, showing that the Heckman sample selection model performs better overall for the specification of gravity equation selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An G, Puttitanun T (2009) Revisiting McCallum’s border puzzle. Econ Dev Q 23: 167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93: 170–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69: 106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE, Marcouiller D (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat 84: 342–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews M, Schank T, Upward R (2006) Practical fixed effects estimation methods for the three-way error components model. Stata J 6: 461–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier S, Bergstrand J (2009) Bonus vetus OLS: a simple approach for addressing the border-puzzle and other gravity issues. J Int Econ 77: 77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin R, DiNino V (2006) Euros and zeros: the common currency effect on trade in new goods. Center for economic policy research discussion papers no 5973

  • Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2006) Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity

  • Baltagi BH, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2003) A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Econ Lett 80: 391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeijk P, Oldersma H (1990) Detente, market-oriented reform and German unification: potential consequences for the World Trade System. Kyklos 43: 599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67: 474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand JH (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71: 143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand JH (1990) The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Econ J 100: 1216–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikker A, de Vos A (1992) An international trade flow model with zero observations: an extension of the Tobit model. Bruss Econ Rev 135: 379–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouet A, Mishra S, Roy D (2008) Does Africa trade less than it should, and if so, why?: the role of market access and domestic factors. International food policy research discussion paper no 770

  • Brun JF, Carrère C, Guillaumont P, de Melo J (2002) Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. World Bank Econ Rev 19: 99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger MJ, van Oort FG, Linders GM (2009) On the specification of the gravity model of trade: zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spat Econ Anal 4: 167–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussière M, Schnatz B (2009) Evaluating China’s integration in world trade with a gravity model based benchmark. Open Econ Rev 20: 85–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafiso G (2008) The Euro’s influence upon trade: rose effect versus border effect. ECB working paper 941

  • Cheng IH, Wall HJ (2005) Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Fed Reserv Bank St. Louis Rev 87: 49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff A (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 7–32

  • De Benedictis L, Vicarelli C (2005) Trade potentials in gravity panel data models. Top Econ Anal Policy 5: 1386–1417

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger P (2000) A Note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Econ Let 66: 25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2003) The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empir Econ 28: 571–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2004) Distance, trade and FDI: a SUR Hausman-Taylor approach. J Appl Economet 19: 227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger P, Larch M, Staub K, Winkelmann R (2011) The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements. Am Econ J Econ Policy 3: 113–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra RC (2002) Border effects and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation. Scot J Polit Econ 49: 491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidrmuc J (2008) Gravity models in integrated panels. Empir Econ 37: 435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratianni M, Hoon-Oh CH (2007) On the relationship between RTA expansion and openness. Kelley School of Business, working paper no 13, Indiana University

  • Glick R, Rose AK (2002) Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. Eur Econ Rev 46: 1125–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq Z, Meilke K, Cranfield J (2010) Does the gravity model suffer from selection bias? Canadian agricultural trade policy research network working paper no 90884

  • Head K, Mayer T (2000) Non-Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Rev World Econ 127: 284–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell JF (1996) Do national borders matter for Quebec’s trade. Can J Econ 29: 507–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1987) Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries. J Jpn Int Econ 1: 62–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Melitz M, Rubinstein Y (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q J Econ 123: 441–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DJ, Millimet DL (2008) Is gravity linear?. J Appl Economet 23: 137–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon-Oh CH, Selmier WT II (2008) Expanding international trade beyond the RTA border: the case of ASEAN’s economic diplomacy. Econ Lett 100: 385–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavallari A, Maas S, Schmitz PM (2008) Explaining German imports of olive oil: evidence from a gravity model. European association of agricultural economists international congress, August 26–29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium

  • Leamer E, Stern R (1971) Quantitative international economics. J Int Econ 1: 359–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann H (1966) An Econometric study of international trade flows. Dissertation, Netherlands School of Economics

  • Linders GM, de Groot H (2006) Estimation of the gravity equation in the presence of zero flows. Tinbergen institute discussion papers 06-072/3

  • Liu X (2009) GATT/WTO promotes trade strongly: sample selection and model specification. Rev Int Econ 17: 428–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning WG, Mulahy J (2001) Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?. J Health Econ 20: 461–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin W, Pham CS (2008) Estimating the gravity equation when zero trade flows are frequent. MPRA working paper 9453, University Library of Munich

  • Martínez-Zarzoso I, Nowak-Lehmann F, Vollmer S (2007) The log of gravity revisited (in revision). CEGE discussion paper 64, University of Göttingen

  • Mátyás L (1998) The gravity model: some econometric considerations. World Econ 21: 397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz M (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz M (2007) North, South and distance in the gravity equation. Eur Econ Rev 51: 971–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micco A, Stein E, Ordoñez G (2003) The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from EMU. Econ Policy 18: 315–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AK, van Wincoop E (2001) National money as a barrier to international trade: the real case for currency union. Am Econ Rev 91: 386–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz J, Vilarrubia JM (2007) The wise use of dummies in gravity models: export potentials in the Euromed region. Banco de España working papers 0720

  • Schiavo S (2007) Common currencies and FDI flows. Oxford Econ Pap 59: 536–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd B, Wilson JS (2009) Trade facilitation in ASEAN member countries: measuring progress and assessing priorities. J Asian Econ 20: 367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siliverstovs B, Schumacher D (2009) Estimating gravity equations: to log or not to log?.  Empir Econ 36: 645–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos Silva JM, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88: 641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos Silva JM, Tenreyro S (2008) Trading partners and trading volume: implementing the Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein model empirically. CEPR discussion papers 0935

  • Shepotylo O (2009) Gravity with zeros: estimating trade potential of CIS countries. Kyiv School of economics discussion papers 16

  • Soloaga I, Winters A (2001) Regionalism in the nineties: what effect on trade?.  N Am J Econ Financ 12: 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZK, Winters LA (1991) The trading potential of Eastern Europe. CEPR discussion paper 610

  • Wei SJ (1996) Intra-national versus international trade: how stubborn are nations in global integration? NBER working paper 5531

  • Westerlund J, Wilhelmsson F (2009) Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Appl Econ 43: 641–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf HC (1997) Patterns of intra- and inter-state trade. NBER working paper 5939

  • Yu M (2010) Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation. J Dev Econ 91: 289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dpto. de Teoría e Historia Económica, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain

    Estrella Gómez-Herrera

Authors
  1. Estrella Gómez-Herrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estrella Gómez-Herrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez-Herrera, E. Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empir Econ 44, 1087–1111 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0576-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0576-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation