Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Labor market dynamics over the business cycle: evidence from Markov switching models

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the evolution of the U.S. labor market across the business cycle and specifically the relationship between the unemployment rate and the average duration of unemployment. Labor market recoveries have long been thought of as lagging recoveries in broad economic activity. In particular, the unemployment rate peaks several months after official business cycle troughs and the average duration of unemployment lags further behind. Using estimates from Markov switching models of the unemployment rate, average duration of unemployment, jobless claims, and the exhaustion rate of regular unemployment insurance, this paper dates contractionary and expansionary phases of various aspects of the labor market and their relationship to the official phases of the business cycle. Evidence from these models suggests that inflows into unemployment recover almost contemporaneously with broad economic activity, while outflows recover almost a year after the end of official recessions. The differential timing in the recoveries of unemployment inflows and outflows, which is not a characteristic of most macro models of the labor market, accounts for the observed pattern between the unemployment rate and average duration of unemployment. Finally, when comparing the phases of the labor market to periods where Congress extends unemployment insurance benefits, it appears that policymakers target periods where the job finding rate is low, rather than periods where the stock of unemployed workers is high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blanchard OJ, Diamond P, Hall RE, Yellen J (1989) The beveridge curve. Brookings Papers Econ Act 1989(1): 1–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldin M (1993) Dating turning points in the business cycle. J Bus 67(1): 97–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brier G (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev 75: 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns AF, Mitchell WC (1946) Measuring business cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco M, Hu L, Ploberger W (2005) Optimal test for Markov switching. Working paper, University of Rochester

  • Chong YY, Hendry DF (1986) Econometric evaluation of linear macro-economic models. Rev Econ Stud 53(4): 671–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps P (2008) Comparing smooth transition and Markov switching autoregressive models of U.S. unemployment. J Appl Econom 23(4): 435–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sanzo S (2007) Testing for linearity in Markov switching models: a bootstrap approach. Stat Methods Appl 18(2): 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsby MWL, Michaels R, Solon G (2009) The ins and outs of cyclical unemployment. Am Econ J Macroecon 1(1): 84–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filardo A (1994) Business-cycle phases and their transitional dynamics. J Bus Econ Stat 12(3): 299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita S, Ramey G (2009) The cyclicality of separation and job finding rates. Int Econ Rev 50(2): 415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RG (2009) Green shoot or dead twig: can unemployment claims predict the end of the American recession? Tech Rep, VoxEU.org

  • Hamilton J (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57: 357–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2005) What is real about the business cycle?. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 87(4): 435–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen B (1992) The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: Testing the Markov switching model of gdp. J Appl Econom 7: S61–S82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz LF, Meyer BD (1990) The impact of the potential duration of unemployment benefits on the duration of unemployment. J Public Econ 41: 45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CJ (1994) Dynamic linear models with Markov switching. J Econom 60: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B (1990) Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58(4): 757–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen DT (1977) Unemployment insurance and job search decisions. Ind Labor Relat Rev 30(4): 505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neftci S (1984) Are economic time series asymmetric over the business cycle?. J Polit Econ 92(2): 307–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlin M (2007) Estimation, simulation and forecasting of an autoregressive Markov switching model in Matlab [Online]. Available from: Matlab File Exchange Center. [Accessed June, 2008]

  • Pesaran MH, Timmerman A (1992) A simple non-parametric test of predictive performance. J Bus Econ Stat 10(4): 461–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Pissarides C (1991) Equilibrium unemployment theory. Basil Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba JM, Summers LH (1986) Reporting errors and labor market dynamics. Econometrica 54(6): 1319–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotham P (1991) Further evidence on the asymmetric behavior of unemployment rates over the business cycle. J Macroecon 13: 291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotham P (2008) Reconisderation of the markov chain evidence on unemloyment rate asymetry. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 12(3):Article 6

  • Shimer R (2005) Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment. nBER Working Paper No. 13421

  • Sichel D (1989) Are business cycles asymmetric? a correction. J Polit 97: 1255–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroman W, Woodbury S (2004) Trend and cycle analysis of unemployment insurance and the employment service. eTA Occasional Paper Series, ETAOP 2005–04

  • Yashiv E (2008) U.S. labor market dynamics revisited. Scand J Econ 109(4): 779–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Schwartz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, J. Labor market dynamics over the business cycle: evidence from Markov switching models. Empir Econ 43, 271–289 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0486-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0486-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation