Abstract
This article investigates Pareto power law (PPL) behavior at the top of the Canadian wealth distribution. To this end, Canadian Business data on the wealthiest 100 Canadians for the years 1999–2008 are used. The resulting estimates of the PPL exponent ranged from approximately 1.0 to 1.3 depending on the year of analysis and the estimation method used. These estimates are roughly comparable to those based on Forbes’ list of the wealthiest 400 Americans. Furthermore, whereas modified OLS and maximum likelihood estimates of the power law exponents conform to Zipf’s law, the OLS estimates do not. These results raise some concerns about deducing the magnitudes of and trends in the power law exponents based on a single estimation method and highlight the importance of extensive hypothesis testing for model adequacy. The battery of diagnostic tests pertaining to PPL behavior at the top of the Canadian wealth distribution yields some conflicting results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamic LA, Huberman BA (2002) Zipf’s law and the internet. Glottometrics 3: 143–150
Alegria C, Schaeck K (2008) On measuring concentration in banking systems. Financ Res Lett 5: 59–67
Ausloos M, Miáiewicz J, Sanglier M (2004) The durations of recession and prosperity: does their distribution follow a power or exponential law?. Physica A 339: 548–558
Axtell RL (2001) Zipf distribution of U.S. firm sizes. Science 293: 1818–1820
Bai MY, Zhu HB (2010) Power law and multiscaling properties of the Chinese stock market. Physica A 389: 1883–1890
Balakrishnan PV, Miller JM, Shankar SG (2008) Power laws and evolutionary trends in stock markets. Econ Lett 98: 194–200
Bauke H (2007) Parameter estimation for power law distributions by maximum likelihood. Eur Phys J B 58: 167–173
Bouchard JP (2001) Power laws in economics and finance: some ideas from physics. Quant Financ 1: 105–112
Cajueiro DO, Tabak BM, Werneck FK (2009) Can we predict crashes? The case of the Brazilian stock market. Physica A 388: 1603–1609
Chatterjee, A, Yarlagadda, S, Chakrabarti, BK (eds) (2005) Econophysics of wealth distributions. Springer, Milan
Cirillo P, Hüsler J (2009) On the upper tail of Italian firms’ size distribution. Physica A 388: 1546–1554
Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51: 661–703
Clementi F, Gallegati M (2005) Power law tails in the Italian personal income distribution. Physica A 350: 427–438
Coelho R, Néda Z, Ramasco JJ, Santos MA (2005) A family network model of wealth distribution in societies. Physica A 353: 515–528
Coelho R, Richmond P, Barry J, Hutzler S (2008) Double power laws in income and wealth distributions. Physica A 387: 3847–3851
Cordoba JC (2008) On the distribution of city sizes. J Urban Econ 63: 177–197
D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA (1986) Goodness-of-fit techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York
Di Guilmi C, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M (2003) Power law scaling in the world income distribution. Econ Bull 15: 1–7
Ding N, Wang YG (2007) Power-law tail in the Chinese wealth distribution. Chin Phys Lett 24: 2434–2436
Drăguleascu A, Yakovenko VM (2001) Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A 299: 213–221
Eryiğit M, Çukur S, Eryigit R (2009) Tail distributions of index fluctuations in world markets. Physica A 388: 1879–1886
Fujiwara Y, Souma W, Kaizoji T, Aoki M (2003) Growth and fluctuations of personal income. Physica A 321: 598–604
Furceri D (2008) Zipf’s law and world income distribution. Appl Econ Lett 15: 921–923
Gabaix X (2009) Power laws in economics and finance. Annu Rev Econ 1: 255–293
Gabaix X, Ibragimov R (2009) Rank-1/2: a simple way to improve the OLS estimation of tail exponents. J Bus Econ Stat. doi:10.1198/jbes.2009.06157
Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Palestrini A (2003a) On the size distribution of firms: additional evidence from the G7 Countries. Physica A 324: 117–123
Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Giulioni G, Palestrini A (2003b) Power laws and macroeconomic fluctuations. Physica A 324: 408–416
Gallegati M, Keen S, Lux T, Ormerod P (2006) Worrying trends in econophysics. Physica A 370: 1–6
Goldstein A, Morris SA, Yen GG (2004) Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. Physica A 41: 255–258
Hu MB, Jiang R, Wu QS, Wu YH (2007) Simulating the wealth distribution with a richest-following strategy on scale-free network. Physica A 381: 467–472
Jayadev A (2008) A power law tail in India’s wealth distribution: evidence from survey data. Physica A 387: 270–276
Klass OS, Biham O, Levy M, Malcai O, Solomon S (2006) The Forbes 400 and the Pareto wealth distribution. Econ Lett 90: 290–295
Klass OS, Biham O, Levy M, Malcai O, Solomon S (2007) The Forbes 400, the Pareto power-law and efficient markets. Eur Phys J B 55: 143–147
Kleiber C, Kotz S (2003) Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley-InterScience, New Jersey
Kvam PH, Vidakovic B (2007) Nonparametric statistics with applications to science and engineering. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley-InterScience, New Jersey
Levy M, Levy H (2003) Investment talent and the Pareto wealth distribution: theoretical and experimental analysis. Rev Econ Stat 85: 709–725
Levy M, Solomon S (1997) New evidence for the power-law distribution of wealth. Physica A 242: 90–94
Morissette R, Zhang X (2007) Revisiting wealth inequality. Persp Labour Income 19: 6–17
Morissette R, Zhang X, Drolet M (2006) The evolution of wealth inequality in Canada, 1984–99. In: Wolff EN (ed) International perspectives on household wealth. Levy Economics Institute, USA, pp 151–192
Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46: 323–351
Sinha S (2006) Evidence for power-law tail of the wealth distribution in India. Physica A 359: 555–562
Soo KT (2005) Zipf’s law for cities: a cross-country investigation. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35: 239–253
Ulubaşoğlu MA, Hazari BR (2004) Zipf’s law strikes again: the case of tourism. J Econ Geogr 4: 459–472
Urzúa CM (2000) A simple and efficient test for Zipf’s law. Econ Lett 66: 257–260
Zhang J, Chen Q, Wang Y (2009) Zipf distribution in top Chinese firms and an economic explanation. Physica A 388: 2020–2024
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogwang, T. Power laws in top wealth distributions: evidence from Canada. Empir Econ 41, 473–486 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0384-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0384-5