Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

School composition effects in Denmark: quantile regression evidence from PISA 2000

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from the first wave of the OECD PISA study are combined with register data for Denmark to estimate the effect of the socioeconomic mix of schools on students’ test scores. A major disadvantage of the PISA design for the analysis of school composition effects is the small students-per-school samples. Adding family background data from administrative registers for all same-aged schoolmates of the PISA students helps overcome this. To compensate for endogeneity in the school composition variable, the results are conditioned on a rich set of family and school variables from the PISA data. Quantile regression results suggest differential school composition effects across the conditional reading score distribution, with students in the lower quantiles achieving the largest test score gains. Mathematics results suggest that high- and low-ability students benefit equally from attending schools with a better student intake, and most results for science are only marginally significant. These results imply that mixing students of different home backgrounds could improve equity of achievement for both reading and mathematics; however, the average skill level would improve only for reading literacy. In mathematics, mixing students would not raise average outcomes, because the detrimental effect on students in the higher quantiles would offset positive effects on those in the lower quantiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammermüller A, Pischke J-S (2006) Peer effects in European primary schools: evidence from PIRLS. IZA discussion paper 2077

  • Andersen AM, Egelund N, Jensen TP, Krone M, Lindenskov L, Mejding J (2001) Forventninger og færdigheder - danske unge i en international sammenligning, (in Danish with an English summary). akf, DPU, SFI. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Bedard K (2003) School quality and the distribution of male earnings in Canada. Econ Educ Rev 22:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts J, Morell D (1999) The determinants of undergraduate grade point average—the relative importance of family background, high school resources, and Peer Group Effects. J Hum Resour 34(2):268–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts J, Zau A (2004) Peer Groups and academic achievement: panel evidence from administrative data. Public Policy Institute of California. February 2004

  • Blau PM (1960) Structural effects. Am Sociol Rev 25:178–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boozer MA, Cacciola SE (2001) Inside the “Black Box” of project STAR: estimation of peer effects using experimental data. Discussion Paper No. 832, Economic Growth Center, Yale University

  • Buchinsky M (1994) Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963–1987: application of quantile regression. Econometrica 62(2):405–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1998) Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empirical research. J Hum Resour 33(1):88–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben R, Barr R (1988) Classroom composition and the design of instruction. Sociol Educ 61:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen G (2002) School composition and achievement in primary education: a large-scale multilevel approach. Stud Educ Eval 28:347–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide E, Showalter M (1998) The effect of school quality on student performance: a quantile regression approach. Econ Lett 58:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J Lab Econ 24(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein L, Symons J (1999) Attainment in secondary school. Oxford Economic Papers 51, 300-321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzenberger B, Koenker R, Machado JAF (eds.) (2001) Empir Econ 26(1)

  • Glavind N (2004) Polarisering på boligmarkedet. (Polarization in the housing market.) Arbejderbevgelsens Erhvervsrå d, Copenhagen

  • Gould ED, Lavy V, Paserman MD (2004) Does immigration affect the long-term educational outcomes of natives? Quasi-experimental evidence. NBER Working Papers 10844, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Goux D, Maurin E (2006) Close neighbours matter: neighbourhood effects on early performance at school. IZA Discussion Paper 2095

  • Green DA, Riddell C (2003) Literacy and earnings: an investigation of the interaction of cognitive and unobserved skills in earnings generation. Labour Econ 10:165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Markman Jacob M, Rivkin SG (2003) Does peer ability affect student achievement? J Appl Econ 18(5):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG (2004) Why public schools lose teachers. J Hum Resour 39(2):326–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby C (2000) Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation. NBER WP 7867

  • Hummelgaard H, Husted L, Holm A, Baadsgaard M, Olrik B (1995) Etniske minoriteter, integration og mobilitet (Ethnic minorities, integration and mobility.) In Danish. akf Forlaget

  • Hummelgaard H, Husted L (2001) Social og etnisk bestemt bostning - årsager og konsekvenser (Socially and ethnically determined housing.) In Danish. akf Forlaget

  • Jencks C, Mayer SE (1990) The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In: Lynn LE, McGeary MGH (eds) Inner-city poverty in the United States. National Academy Press, Washingto

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin J (2001) For whom the reductions count: a quantile regression analysis of class size and peer effects on scholastic achievement. Empir Econ 26:221–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahard RE, Crain RL (1983) Research on minority achievement in desegregated schools. In: Rossell CH, Howley WD (eds) The consequences of school segregation. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp 103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60(3):531—542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. J Econ Perspect 14(3):115—136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan PJ (2003) Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile. Econ Educ Rev 22:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Knowledge and skills for life—first results from PISA 2000. OECD, Paris

  • OECD (2002a) PISA 2000 technical report. OECD, Paris

  • OECD (2002b) Manual for the PISA 2000 database. OECD, Paris

  • OECD (2003) Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. OECD, Paris

  • Rivkin SG, Hanushek EA, Kain JF (2005) Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica 73:417–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D, Symons J (2003) Do peer groups matter? Peer groups versus schooling effects on academic achievement. Econ 70:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: results for Dartmouth Roommates. Q J Econ 116(2):681–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweis N, Winter-Ebmer R (2007) Peer effects in Austrian Schools. Empir Econ (forthcoming)

  • Shavit Y, Williams RA (1985) Ability grouping and contextual determinants of educational expectations in Israel. Am Sociol Rev 50:62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström M, Uusitalo R (2005) School choice and segregation: evidence from an admission reform. IFAU Working Paper Nr. 7/2005. Uppsala, Sweden

  • Thrupp M, Lauder H, Robinson T (2002) School composition and peer effects. Int J Educ Res 37:483–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NM (1991) Task related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. J Res Math Educ 22:366–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms JD (1986) Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. Am Sociol Rev 51(2):224–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson A (1959) Residential segregation of social classes and aspirations of high school boys. Am Sociol Rev 24:836–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann J (2004) How equal are educational opportunities? family background and student achievement in Europe and the United States. IZA Working Paper No. 1284. Bonn

  • Zimmer RW, Toma EF (2000) Peer effects in private and public schools across countries. J Policy Anal Manage 19(1):75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman DJ (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Rev Econ Stat 85:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AKF, Danish Institute of Governmental Research, Nyropsgade 37, 1602, Copenhagen V, Denmark

    Beatrice Schindler Rangvid

Authors
  1. Beatrice Schindler Rangvid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatrice Schindler Rangvid.

Additional information

I thank Amelie Constant, Bernd Fitzenberger, Eskil Heinesen, Peter Jensen, Craig Riddell, Michael Rosholm, Nina Smith, Robert Wright and participants at the ESPE and EALE 2003 conferences and at AKF seminars, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support provided by the Danish Social Science Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rangvid, B.S. School composition effects in Denmark: quantile regression evidence from PISA 2000. Empirical Economics 33, 359–388 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0133-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0133-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation