Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation and fracture behavior of 5052 aluminum alloy by electromagnetic-driven stamping

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The plastic deformation ability of aluminum alloys is poor and cracking can easily occur during traditional stamping. Electromagnetic forming is a high-speed forming method that can increase the forming limits of aluminum alloys. However, shape deformation of the part is difficult to control owing to fast deformation speeds and uneven electromagnetic force distribution. In this paper, electromagnetic driven stamping (EMDS) is used that combines electromagnetic forming with traditional stamping is proposed. The deformation process of 5052 aluminum alloy sheets during static and dynamic stamping was analyzed through experimental investigations and numerical simulations. Under dynamic conditions, the forming height of 5052-O aluminum alloy increased by 11.4% compared with quasi-static stamping. The Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman damage model was adopted to predict deformation and fracture behavior during the stamping process. During dynamic stamping, the strain rate reached 405 s−1, which is much higher than that in quasi-static stamping. With EMDS, the void volume fraction in the cracked region decreased by 17.6% compared with quasi-static stamping. Under a high strain rate, the sheet forming height improved as void formation was inhibited and dimples were more evenly distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and materials are fully available without restriction.

References

  1. Wang L, Strangwood M, Balint D, Lin J, Dean TA (2011) Formability and failure mechanisms of AA2024 under hot forming conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 528(6):2648–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ko DC, Ko DH, Kim JH, Park JH (2017) Development of a partition panel of an Al6061 sheet metal part for the improvement of formability and mechanical properties by hot forming quenching. Adv Mech Eng 9(2):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xiong WR, Wang WP, Wan M, Pan L (2014) Effect of the duration of electromagnetic pulse force on the rebound suppression in V-bending experiment. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on high speed forming, pp 335–344

  4. Chu YY, Lee RS, Psyk V, Tekkaya AE (2012) Determination of the flflow curve at high strain rates using electromagnetic punch stretching. J Mater Process Technol 212(6):1314–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu JR, Lin QQ, Cui JJ, Li CF (2014) Formability of magnetic pulse uniaxial tension of AZ31magnesium alloy sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 72(5):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fang JX, J. Mo JH, Li JJ (2017) Microstructure difference of 5052 aluminum alloys under conventional drawing and electromagnetic pulse assis-ted incremental drawing. Mater Charact 129:88-97

  7. Su HL, Huang L, Li JJ, Xiao W, Zhu H, Feng F, Li HW, Yan SL (2021) Formability of AA 2219-O sheet under quasi-static, electromagnetic dynamic, and mechanical dynamic tensile loadings. J Mater Sci Technol 70(11):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li N, Yu HP, Xu Z, Fan ZS, Liu L (2016) Electromagnetic forming facilitates the transition of deformation mechanism in 5052 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 673:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu DH, Zhou WH, Li CF (2013) Springback control and deformation analysis for electromagnetically assisted bending of U-shaped part. Chin J Nonferrous Met 23(11):3075–3082

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feng F, Li JJ, Chen RC, Huang L, Su HL, Fan S (2021) Multi-point die electromagnetic incremental forming for large-sized sheet metals. J Manuf Process 62:458–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui XH, Zhang ZW, Du ZH, Yu HL, Qiu DY, Cheng YQ (2020) Inverse bending and springback-control using magnetic pulse forming. J Mater Process Technol 27:116374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su HL, Huang L, Li JJ, Zhang QX, Liu XL, Ma F (2020) On the forming uniformity during a single layer forming of electromagnetic incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 107:4561–4572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui XH, Mo JH, Li JJ, Zhao J, Zhu Y, Huang L, Li ZW, Zhong K (2014) Electromagnetic incremental forming (EMIF): a novel aluminum alloy sheet and tube forming technology. J Mater Process Technol 214(2):409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao QL, Du LM, Li ZH, Lai ZP, Li ZZ, Chen M, Li XX, Xu SF, Chen Q, Han XT, Li L (2018) Investigation of the Lorentz-force-driven sheet metal stamping process for cylindrical cup forming. J Mater Process Technol 271:532–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He M, Li FG, Wang ZG (2011) Forming limit stress diagram prediction of aluminum alloy 5052 based on GTN model parameters determ. Chin J Aeronaut 24(3):378–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feng F, Li JJ, Yuan P, Zhang QX, Huang P, Su HL, Chen RC (2018) Application of a GTN damage model predicting the fracture of 5052-O aluminum alloy high-speed electromagnetic impaction. Metals 8(10):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Archut JL, Vinyas Upadhyaya YS (2018) Estimation of damage value of SAE4340 steel and 5A02 aluminium alloy. Int J Auto Mech Eng 15(2):5211–5220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenab A, Green DE, Alpas AT, Golovashchenko SF (2017) Experimental and numerical analyses of formability improvement of AA5182-O sheet during electro-hydraulic forming. J Mater Process Technol 255:914–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 51775563), and the Project of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University (ZZYJKT2020-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zhihao Du: methodology, investigation, experiments, writing original draft.

Xiaohui Cui: methodology, investigation, writing—review and editing.

Huan Yang: investigation.

Wenzhen Xia: investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohui Cui.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Consent to publish

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Z., Cui, X., Yang, H. et al. Deformation and fracture behavior of 5052 aluminum alloy by electromagnetic-driven stamping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123, 3955–3968 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10446-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10446-2

Keywords

Navigation