Skip to main content
Log in

Residual stress and distortion modeling on aeronautical aluminum alloy parts for machining sequence optimization

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The manufacture of machined components for the aeronautics industry often involves the removal of large quantities of material, while the stringent demands on quality require special care to be taken during the manufacturing process. For most components of this kind, the principal source of distortion is the relaxation of residual stress after the earlier manufacturing processes. In this paper, the problem is addressed through modeling and simulating the final displacement fields obtained after different machining sequences of an aeronautic turbine component, in order to determine the optimum machining sequence among the options that lead to the same final part. Some of the main problems associated with this issue are also addressed, such as the high computational cost and time needed for simulations and expensive equipment needed for residual stress measurement. The level-set technique is employed, which decreases remeshing needs, while affordable nondestructive techniques for measuring residual stress are developed, providing qualitative information that is especially useful in industrial environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masoudi S, Amini S, Saeidi E, Eslami-Chalander H (2015) Effect of machining-induced residual stress on the distortion of thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6281-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang X, Sun J, Li J (2015) Effect of initial residual stress and machining-induced residual stress on the deformation of aluminium alloy plate. Stroj Vestnik/Journal Mech Eng 61(2):131–137. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2014.1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Werke M, Wretland A, Ottosson P, Holmberg J, Machens M, Semere D (2018) Geometric distortion analysis using a combination of the contour method and machining simulation. 51st CIRP Conf. Manuf Syst 72:1481–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Y, Li M, Li KR (2014) Comparison and analysis of main effect elements of machining distortion for aluminum alloy and titanium alloy aircraft monolithic component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):1803–1811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5431-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Zhang D, Wu B, Luo M (2018) Prediction of distortion induced by machining residual stresses in thin-walled components. 4153–4162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1358-y

  6. Li J, Wang S (2017) Distortion caused by residual stresses in machining aeronautical aluminum alloy parts: recent advances. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:997–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9066-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Alvise L, Chantzis D, Schoinochoritis B, Salonitis K (2015) Modelling of part distortion due to residual stresses relaxation: an aeronautical case study. 15th CIRP Conf. Model Mach Oper 31:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suárez A, Veiga F, Polvorosa R, Artaza T, Holmberg J, López de Lacalle LN, Wretland A (2019) Surface integrity and fatigue of non-conventional machined alloy 718. J Manuf Proc 48:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sim WM (2010) Challenges of residual stress and part distortion in the civil airframe industry. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop 5(4–5):446–455. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMP.2010.037621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cerutti X, Mocellin K (2016) Influence of the machining sequence on the residual stress redistribution and machining quality: analysis and improvement using numerical simulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):489–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7521-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cerutti X, Mocellin K, Hassini S, Blaysat B, Duc E (2017) Methodology for aluminium part machining quality improvement considering mechanical properties and process conditions. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:18–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Osher S, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79(1):12–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D, Davies M, Jawahir IS (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62:695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierard O, Barboza J, Duflot M, D’Alvise L, Perez-Duarte A (2008) Distortions prediction during multi-pass machining simulations by using the level-set method. Int J Mater Form 1:563–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bieberdorf N, Towner Z, Hubbard NB, Gerstle W (2018) An evaluation of different plasticity and failure Laws in simulating puncture in 7075-T651 aluminum. Report, Sandia National Laboratories

  16. Corona E, Orient GE (2014) An evaluation of the Johnson-Cook model to simulate puncture of 7075 aluminum plates. Report, Sandia National Laboratories

  17. Schajer GS (ed) (2013) Practical residual stress measurement methods. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chantzis D, Van-Der-Veen S, Zettler J, Sim WM (2013) An industrial workflow to minimise part distortion for machining of large monolithic components in aerospace industry. 14th CIRP Conf. Model Mach Oper 8:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Belytschko T, Moës N, Usui S, Parimi C (2001) Arbitrary discontinuities in finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(4):993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<993::AID-NME164>3.0.CO;2-M

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Cerutti X, Mocellin K (2015) Parallel finite element tool to predict distortion induced by initial residual stresses during machining of aeronautical parts. Int J Mater Form 8(2):255–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-014-1164-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kappmeyer G, Hubig C, Hardy M, Witty M, Busch M (2012) Modern machining of advanced aerospace alloys-enabler for quality and performance. Procedia CIRP 1(1):28–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Basque Government’s technology, innovation and competitiveness vice-counseling department, grant agreement kk-2019/00004 (PROCODA project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikel Casuso.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casuso, M., Polvorosa, R., Veiga, F. et al. Residual stress and distortion modeling on aeronautical aluminum alloy parts for machining sequence optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110, 1219–1232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05816-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05816-7

Keywords

Navigation