Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability performance indicators for additive manufacturing: a literature review based on product life cycle studies

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of researchers tried to work on assuring sustainability in the design and manufacturing of products. But to date, there are subjective understandings on sustainability itself and limitations on balanced consideration of sustainability dimensions for product life cycle in decision-making. Moreover, following an emerging shift toward the design for additive manufacturing from design for manufacturing, less effort has been put to identify opportunities of sustainability performance of additive manufacturing. Therefore, a comprehensive list and interpretation of sustainable performance indicators targeting additive manufacturing needs further study. This study aims to propose sustainability performance indicators for additive manufacturing based on product life cycle studies. It incorporates detailed interpretation on how to use each indicator depending on type of product, application, and goal of decision makers to assure sustainable performance of a product during pre-manufacturing, manufacturing, use, post-use, and associated logistics stages of its life cycle. Authors performed extensive review and assessment of existing literature on sustainability, sustainable design, and manufacturing and additive manufacturing and its opportunity for realizing a more sustainable product. A sustainability performance indicators’ list for 68 sub-subcategory of sustainability among which 29 for environment, 9 for economic, and 30 for social dimension is carefully identified and interpreted. Finally, an application section is supplemented to justify robustness of the results by considering life cycle aspect of a product to illustrate selection strategy of indicators from the proposed list and validation for exhaustiveness through comparison with ten of the widely accepted indicator sets and guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad S, Wong KY, Tseng ML, Wong WP (2018) Sustainable product design and development: a review of tools, applications and research prospects. Resour Conserv Recycl 132:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alarcon B, Aguado A, Manga R, Josa A (2010) A value function for assessing sustainability: application to industrial buildings. Sustainability 3:35–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badurdeen F, Jawahir IS (2017) Strategies for value creation through sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 8:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaucaire P, Gayton N, Duc E, Lemaire M, Dantan J-Y (2012) Statistical tolerance analysis of a hyperstatic mechanism, using system reliability methods. Comput Ind Eng 63:1118–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Behrisch J, Ramirez M, Giurco D (2011) Representation of ecodesign practice: international comparison of industrial design consultancies. Sustainability 3:1778–1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beng LG, Omar B (2014) Integrating axiomatic design principles into sustainable product development. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bereketli I, Erol Genevois M (2013) An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development. J Clean Prod 54:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boks C (2006) The soft side of ecodesign. J Clean Prod 14:1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonvoisin J, Lelah A, Mathieux F, Brissaud D (2014) An integrated method for environmental assessment and ecodesign of ICT-based optimization services. J Clean Prod 68:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borchardt M, Wendt MH, Pereira GM, Sellitto MA (2011) Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices: environmental impact and cost reduction achievements. J Clean Prod 19:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boulanger P-M (2008) Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue. Surv Perspect Integr Environ Soc 1:59–73. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-59-2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bourell D, Kruth JP, Leu M, Levy G, Rosen D, Beese AM, Clare A (2017) Materials for additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann 66:659–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bovea MD, Pérez-Belis V (2012) A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J Clean Prod 20:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bracke S, Yamada S, Kinoshita Y, Inoue M, Yamada T (2017) Decision making within the conceptual design phase of eco-friendly products. Procedia Manuf 8:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brones F, Monteiro de Carvalho M (2015) From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model. J Clean Prod 96:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchert T, Kaluza A, Halstenberg FA, Lindow K, Hayka H, Stark R (2014) Enabling product development engineers to select and combine methods for sustainable design. Procedia CIRP 15:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Casamayor JL, Su D (2013) Integration of eco-design tools into the development of eco-lighting products. J Clean Prod 47:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ceschin F, Gaziulusoy I (2016) Evolution of design for sustainability: from product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Des Stud 47:118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chaim O, Muschard B, Cazarini E, Rozenfeld H (2018) Insertion of sustainability performance indicators in an industry 4.0 virtual learning environment. Procedia Manuf 21:446–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chatzisideris MD, Espinosa N, Laurent A, Krebs FC (2016) Ecodesign perspectives of thin-film photovoltaic technologies: a review of life cycle assessment studies. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 156:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chong L, Ramakrishna S, Singh S (2018) A review of digital manufacturing-based hybrid additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:2281–2300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1345-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cobut A, Beauregard R, Blanchet P (2015) Reducing the environmental footprint of interior wood doors in non-residential buildings – part 2: ecodesign. J Clean Prod 109:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen S, Bose S, Guo D, Miller A, DeFrancia K, Berger O, Filiatraut B, Loman M, Qiu W, Zhang C (2014) Sustainability metrics

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cor E, Domingo L, Brissaud D, Zwolinski P (2014) A protocol to perform usage oriented ecodesign. CIRP Ann 63:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Pauw IC, Karana E, Kandachar P, Poppelaars F (2014) Comparing biomimicry and cradle to cradle with Ecodesign: a case study of student design projects. J Clean Prod 78:174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deutz P, McGuire M, Neighbour G (2013) Eco-design practice in the context of a structured design process: an interdisciplinary empirical study of UK manufacturers. J Clean Prod 39:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duc E, Pateloup V, Ray P (2006) The certification of CAM output toolpaths: a necessary improvement. IFAC Proc 39:837–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dufrene M, Zwolinski P, Brissaud D (2013) An engineering platform to support a practical integrated eco-design methodology. CIRP Ann 62:131–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eastwood MD, Haapala KR (2015) A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assessment during design for manufacturing. J Clean Prod 108:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Emerson J, Levy M, Salteli A (2008) Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). Choice Rev Online 45:45-2621-45–2621. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.45-2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, Sherbinin A (2005) 2005 environmental sustainability index: benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship

  33. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallagher J, Styles D, McNabola A, Williams AP (2015) Making green technology greener: achieving a balance between carbon and resource savings through ecodesign in hydropower systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gardan N, Schneider A (2015) Topological optimization of internal patterns and support in additive manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 37:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gebisa AW, Lemu HG (2017) Design for manufacturing to design for additive manufacturing: analysis of implications for design opimality and product sustainability [WWW document]. URL https://ac-els-cdn-com.sicd.clermont-universite.fr/S2351978917307552/1-s2.0-S2351978917307552-main.pdf?_tid=spdf-77e36862-5c53-4476-8a1a-be70723a9b6d&acdnat=1519751811_b49a5188b531594dc34568bc67af362f. Accessed 2.27.18

  37. Ghobadian A, Talavera I, Bhattacharya A, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA, O’Regan N (2018) Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.001

  38. Giffi A, Gangula B, Illinda P (2014) 3D-opportunity-auto-industry [WWW document]. URL https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/additive-manufacturing-3d-opportunity-in-automotive/DUP_707-3D-Opportunity-Auto-Industry_MASTER.pdf. Accessed 3.5.18

  39. Golinska P, Kosacka M, Mierzwiak R, Werner-Lewandowska K (2015) Grey decision making as a tool for the classification of the sustainability level of remanufacturing companies. J Clean Prod 105:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonzalez EDRS, Sarkis J, Huisingh D, Huatuco LH, Maculan N, Montoya-Torres JR, de Almeida CMVB (2015) Making real progress toward more sustainable societies using decision support models and tools: introduction to the special volume. J Clean Prod 105:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gri G (2000) Sustainability reporting guidelines

  42. Gupta N, Weber C, Newsome S (2012) Additive manufacturing: status and opportunities. Sci Technol Policy Inst Wash

  43. Gupta K, Laubscher RF, Davim JP, Jain NK (2016) Recent developments in sustainable manufacturing of gears: a review. J Clean Prod 112:3320–3330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Haapala KR, Zhao F, Camelio J, Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Dornfeld DA, Jawahir IS, Clarens AF, Rickli JL (2013) A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 135:041013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hapuwatte B, Seevers KD, Badurdeen F, Jawahir IS (2016) Total life cycle sustainability analysis of additively manufactured products. Procedia CIRP 48:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Holm M (2018) The future shop-floor operators, demands, requirements and interpretations. J Manuf Syst 47:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jain R (2005) Sustainability: metrics, specific indicators and preference index. Clean Techn Environ Policy 7:71–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-005-0273-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon OW, Jawahir IS (2010) Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jin M, Tang R, Ji Y, Liu F, Gao L, Huisingh D (2017) Impact of advanced manufacturing on sustainability: an overview of the special volume on advanced manufacturing for sustainability and low fossil carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 161:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Joung CB, Carrell J, Sarkar P, Feng SC (2013) Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol Indic 24:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Karlsson R, Luttropp C (2006) EcoDesign: what’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. J Clean Prod 14:1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kerbrat O, Bourhis FL, Mognol P, Hascoët J-Y (2015) Environmental performance modeling for additive manufacturing processes. Int J Rapid Manuf 5:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kiswanto G, Hendriko H, Duc E (2014) An analytical method for obtaining cutter workpiece engagement during a semi-finish in five-axis milling. Comput Aided Des 55:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kulatunga AK, Karunatilake N, Weerasinghe N, Ihalawatta RK (2015) Sustainable manufacturing based decision support model for product design and development process. Procedia CIRP 26:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lambrecht H, Thißen N (2015) Enhancing sustainable production by the combined use of material flow analysis and mathematical programming. J Clean Prod 105:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Langeron JM, Duc E, Lartigue C, Bourdet P (2004) A new format for 5-axis tool path computation, using Bspline curves. Comput Aided Des 36:1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2003.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee C-K, Lee J-Y, Choi Y-H, Lee K-M (2016) Application of the integrated ecodesign method using the GHG emission as a single indicator and its GHG recyclability. J Clean Prod 112:1692–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li Y, Mathiyazhagan K (2018) Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod 172:2931–2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lu C, Gao L, Li X, Chen P (2016) Energy-efficient multi-pass turning operation using multi-objective backtracking search algorithm. J Clean Prod 137:1516–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Madan Shankar K, Kannan D, Udhaya Kumar P (2017) Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices – a case study in Indian context. J Clean Prod 164:1332–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mathieux F, Brissaud D, Zwolinski P (2007) Product ecodesign and materials: current status and future prospects. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv07111788

  63. Moktadir MA, Rahman T, Rahman MH, Ali SM, Paul SK (2018) Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: a perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh. J Clean Prod 174:1366–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Moldavska A, Welo T (2017) The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: a content-analysis based literature review. J Clean Prod 166:744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Peralta Álvarez ME, Marcos Bárcena M, Aguayo González F (2017) On the sustainability of machining processes. Proposal for a unified framework through the triple bottom-line from an understanding review. J Clean Prod 142:3890–3904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pigosso DCA, Zanette ET, Filho AG, Ometto AR, Rozenfeld H (2010) Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 18:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Platcheck ER, Schaeffer L, Kindlein W, Cãndido LHA (2008) Methodology of ecodesign for the development of more sustainable electro-electronic equipments. J Clean Prod 16:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rachuri S, Sriram RD, Narayanan A, Sarkar P, Lee JH, Lyons KW, Srinivasan V, Kemmerer SJ (2011) Summary of the NIST workshop on sustainable manufacturing: metrics, standards, and infrastructure. Int J Sustain Manuf 2:237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rauch M, Duc E, Hascoet J-Y (2009) Improving trochoidal tool paths generation and implementation using process constraints modelling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Reich-Weiser C, Vijayaraghavan A, Dornfeld DA (2008) Metrics for sustainable manufacturing. In: ASME 2008 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Collocated with the 3rd JSME/ASME International Conference on Materials and Processing. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 327–335

  71. Rossi M, Germani M, Zamagni A (2016) Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. J Clean Prod 129:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Roy R (1994) The evolution of ecodesign. Technovation 14:363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, International series in operations research & management science, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  74. Salonitis K, Ball P (2013) Energy efficient manufacturing from machine tools to manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 7:634–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Shao G, Brodsky A, Shin S-J, Kim DB (2017) Decision guidance methodology for sustainable manufacturing using process analytics formalism. J Intell Manuf 28:455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0995-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Shojaeipour S (2015) Sustainable manufacturing process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6705-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sossou G, Demoly F, Montavon G, Gomes S (2018) An additive manufacturing oriented design approach to mechanical assemblies. J Comput Des Eng 5:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. STELIA Aerospace (2018. World premiere for additive manufacturing: STELIA Aerospace presents a demonstrator for metallic self-reinforced fuselage pannels manufactured by 3D impression. URL http://additivemanufacturing.com/2018/02/21/world-premiere-for-additive-manufacturing-stelia-aerospace-presents-a-demonstrator-for-metallic-self-reinforced-fuselage-pannels-manufactured-by-3d-impression/. Accessed 3.5.18

  79. Stoycheva S, Marchese D, Paul C, Padoan S, Juhmani A, Linkov I (2018) Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry. J Clean Prod 187:257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tang Y, Mak K, Zhao YF (2016) A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 137:1560–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Vaneker THJ (2017) the role of design for additive manufacturing in the successful economical introduction of AM. Procedia CIRP 60:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Vereinte Nationen (ed) (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies, 3rd edn. United Nations publication. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  83. Watson JK, Taminger KMB (2018) A decision-support model for selecting additive manufacturing versus subtractive manufacturing based on energy consumption. J Clean Prod 176:1316–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Yang S, Zhao YF (2015) Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Yuan C, Zhai Q, Dornfeld D (2012) A three dimensional system approach for environmentally sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Ann 61:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zackrisson M, Kurdve M, Shahbazi S, Wiktorsson M, Winroth M, Landström A, Almström P, Andersson C, Windmark C, Öberg AE, Myrelid A (2017) Sustainability performance indicators at shop floor level in large manufacturing companies. Procedia CIRP 61:457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhang H, Calvo-Amodio J, Haapala KR (2013) A conceptual model for assisting sustainable manufacturing through system dynamics. J Manuf Syst 32:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000, Clermont–Ferrand, France

    Getasew Taddese, Severine Durieux & Emmanuel Duc

  2. Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa University, P.B. 375, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Getasew Taddese

Authors
  1. Getasew Taddese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Severine Durieux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emmanuel Duc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Getasew Taddese.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taddese, G., Durieux, S. & Duc, E. Sustainability performance indicators for additive manufacturing: a literature review based on product life cycle studies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 3109–3134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05249-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05249-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation