Skip to main content
Log in

Novel servo-feed-drive model considering cutting force and structural effects in milling to predict servo dynamic behaviors

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 19 March 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated servo-feed-drive model including the cutting force and structural effect to predict tracking errors in an end-milling process. Most conventional approaches consider the cutting force to be an equivalent torque to servo feed drive. However, in addition to acting as the equivalent torque to the servo feed drive, cutting forces also cause the machine table to vibrate. This paper considers the aforementioned cutting-force effects to predict tracking errors and then verifies the tracking errors using experimental results. Experiments are conducted on a 3-axis computer numerical control (CNC) machining center to validate the tracking errors predicted by the proposed servo-feed-drive model. For one case study, the peak-to-peak tracking errors from the experimental, proposed, and traditional models are 3 μm, 2.8 μm, and 0.5 μm, respectively, for the x-axis, and 2.1 μm, 1.7 μm, and 0.4 μm, respectively, for the y-axis. The experimental results illustrate that the tracking errors predicted using the proposed model are more accurate than those predicted using the traditional model without consideration of the transmission path. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed integrated model provides much accurate tracking-error prediction, and thus, the ball-screw and machine-table flexibilities should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 19 March 2020

    In the accepted paper, the authors��� affiliation has been wrongly typeset as People���s Republic of China, but this should read Taiwan. The correct affiliations are shown below.

References

  1. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2005) Tracking and contour error control in CNC servo systems. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(3):301–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools — a review: part II: thermal errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(9):1257–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Muhammad BB, Wan M, Feng J, Zhang WH (2017) Dynamic damping of machining vibration: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9):2935–2952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang GP, Huang YM, Shi WH, Fu WP (2003) Predicting dynamic behaviours of a whole machine tool structure based on computer-aided engineering. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(7):699–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Law M, Altintas Y, Phani AS (2013) Rapid evaluation and optimization of machine tools with position-dependent stability. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 68(1):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu J, Han Y, Xiong Z, Ding H (2017) Servo performance improvement through iterative tuning feedforward controller with disturbance compensator. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 117(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohishi K, Miyazaki T, Inomata K, Yanagisawa H, Koide D, Tokumaru H (2006) Robust tracking servo system considering force disturbance for the optical disk recording system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53(3):838–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erkorkmaz K, Altintas Y (2001) High speed CNC system design part II modeling and identification of feed drives. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(10):1487–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Y, Huang P, Yen J (2002) Frequency-domain identification algorithms for servo system with friction. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 10(5):654–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsson H, Åström KJ, Canudas de Wit C, Gäfvert M, Lischinsky P (1998) Friction models and friction compensation. Eur J Control 4(3):176–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen BD, Aldo AF, Olivier AB (2007) Efficient simulation of a dynamic system with LuGre friction. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2(4):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Altintas Y, Weckb M (2004) Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP Ann 53(2):619–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Budak E, Altintas Y (1998) Analytical prediction of chatter stability in milling part I general formulation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 120(1):22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmitz TL, Smith KS (2009) Machining dynamics frequency response to improved productivity. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tachikawa T, Iba D, Kurita N, Nakamura M, Moriwaki I (2017) Basic study on calculation of cutting forces useful for reducing vibration in skiving. J Mech Des 139(10):104501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Altintas Y (1992) Prediction of cutting forces and tool breakage in milling from feed drive current measurements. J Eng Ind 114(4):386–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee CH, Yang MY, Oh CW, Gim TW, Ha JY (2015) An integrated prediction model including the cutting process for virtual product development of machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 90(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang X, Zhang J, Zhang W, Liang T, Liu H, Zhao W (2018) Integrated modeling and analysis of ball screw feed system and milling process with consideration of multi-excitation effect. Mech Syst Signal Process 98(1):484–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aslan D, Altintas Y (2018) Prediction of cutting forces in five-axis milling using feed drive current measurements. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 23(2):833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai MS, Huang YC (2016) A novel integrated dynamic acceleration/deceleration interpolation algorithm for a CNC controller. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1):279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsai MS, Nien HW, Yau HT (2011) Development of integrated acceleration/deceleration look-ahead interpolation technique for multi-blocks NURBS curves. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(5):601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin MT, Yen CL, Tsai MS, Yau HT (2013) Application of robust iterative learning algorithm in motion control system. Mechatronics 23(5):530–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. The MathWorks, Inc (2019) MATLAB system identification toolbox reference. MathWorks, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levi EC (1959) Complex-curve fitting. IRE Trans Automat Contr AC-4(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The MathWorks, Inc (2019) MATLAB signal processing toolbox reference. MathWorks, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The financial supports were provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, R. O. C., under the grant MOST 106-2221-E-002-240-MY2, 107-2218-E-002-071 and by Precision Machinery Research and Development Center (PMC), R. O. C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiang-Chun Tseng.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, CJ., Tseng, HC., Tsai, MS. et al. Novel servo-feed-drive model considering cutting force and structural effects in milling to predict servo dynamic behaviors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 1441–1451 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04778-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04778-9

Keywords

Navigation