Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical models for cycle time and throughput evaluation of multi-shuttle deep-lane AVS/RS

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increased need for just-in-time delivery of finite goods has pulled the development of novel automation solutions to manage warehouse activities. Among the available technologies, autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems (AVS/RS) rely on light vehicles able to travel independently and to perform different tasks at the same time, thus exhibiting enhanced flexibility and increased throughput level. Nonetheless, techniques to evaluate the performance of such systems still exhibit some gaps and are mainly focused on simple configurations. This paper aims to extend the state of the art by introducing novel analytical models capable to assess the performance of a tier-to-tier, multi-shuttle AVS/RS feeding a deep-lane rack. The proposed approach enables to evaluate the expected cycle time and throughput by (i) enabling the possibility to consider the real criteria adopted to store and retrieve items, and (ii) taking into account the ability of the vehicles to simultaneously perform different tasks. The model is validated against simulations performed on different rack layouts, on AVS/RS with different fleet compositions, for different types of cycle. The developed model aims to support both the design and the deployment phases of AVS/RS by enabling quick and accurate performance estimation in a wide variety of scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markets and Markets (2017) Automated storage and retrieval system (ASRS) market by type (unit load, mini load, VLM, carousel, autostore, & mid load), function (assembly, storage, order picking, kitting, & distribution), industry, and geography - global forecast to 2023. Available at https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/automated-storage-retrieval-system-market-195267987.html

  2. Malmborg CJ (2002) Conceptualizing tools for autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res 40(8):1807–1822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110118668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tappia E, Marchet G, Melacini M, Perotti S (2015) Incorporating the environmental dimension in the assessment of automated warehouses. Prod Plan Control 26(10):824–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2014.990945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FEM European materials handling federation (2017) Standard 9.860. Cycle time calculation for automated vehicle storage and retrieval systems

  5. Malmborg CJ (2003) Interleaving dynamics in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res 41(5):1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754021000033887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuo PH, Krishnamurthy A, Malmborg CJ (2007) Design models for unit load storage and retrieval systems using autonomous vehicle technology and resource conserving storage and dwell point policies. Appl Math Model 31:2332–2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2006.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukunari M, Malmborg CJ (2008) An efficient cycle time model for autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res 46(12):3167–3184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601118454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukunari M, Malmborg CJ (2009) A network queuing approach for evaluation of performance measures in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Eur J Oper Res 193(1):152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang L, Krishnamurthy A, Malmborg CJ, Heragu SS (2009) Variance-based approximations of transaction waiting times in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Eur J Ind Eng 3(2):146–169. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2009.023603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roy D, Krishnamurthy A, Heragu SS, Malmborg CJ (2012) Performance analysis and design trade-offs in warehouses with autonomous vehicle technology. IIE Trans 44(12):1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2012.665201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy D, Krishnamurthy A, Heragu SS, Malmborg CJ (2015) Stochastic models for unit-load operations in warehouse systems with autonomous vehicles. Ann Oper Res 231(1):129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1665-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy D, Krishnamurthy A, Heragu SS, Malmborg CJ (2017) A multi-tier linking approach to analyze performance of autonomous vehicle-based storage and retrieval systems. Comput Oper Res 83:173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.02.012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Epp M, Wiedemann S, Furmans K (2017) A discrete-time queueing network approach to performance evaluation of autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res 55(4):960–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1208371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ekren BY, Heragu SS (2009) Simulation based regression analysis for rack configuration of autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system. The 2009 Winter Simulation Conference

  15. Ekren BY (2011) Performance evaluation of AVS/RS under various design scenarios: a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 55(9):1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3137-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchet G, Melacini M, Perotti S, Tappia E (2012) Analytical model to estimate performances of autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems for product totes. Int J Prod Res 50 (24):7134–7148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.639815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlo HJ, Vis IFA (2012) Sequencing dynamic storage systems with multiple lifts and shuttles. Int J Prod Econ 140:844–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lerher T, Ekren BY, Dukic G, Rosi B (2015) Travel time model for shuttle-based storage and retrieval systems. Int J of Adv Manuf Tech 78(9):1705–1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6726-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerher T (2016) Travel time model for double-deep shuttle-based storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res 54(9):2519–2540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1061717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lerher T (2018) Aisle changing shuttle carriers in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res 56(11):3859–3879. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1467060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ekren BY, Akpunar A, Sari Z, Lerher T (2018) A tool for time, variance and energy related performance estimations in a shuttle-based storage and retrieval system. Appl Math Model 63:109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.037

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Borovinsek M, Ekren BY, Burinskiene A, Lerher T (2017) Multi-objective optimisation model of shuttle-based storage and retrieval system. Transport 32(2):120–137. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2016.1186732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ning Z, Lei L, Saipeng Z, Lodewijks G (2016) An efficient simulation model for rack design in multi-elevator shuttle-based storage and retrieval system. Simul Modell Pract Theory 67:100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lerher T, Ekren BY, Sari Z, Rosi B (2015) Simulation analysis of shuttle based storage and retrieval systems. Int J Simul Modell 14(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM14(1)5.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lerher T, Borovinsek M, Ficko M, Palcic I (2017) Parametric study of throughput performance in SBS/RS based on simulation. Int J Simul Model 16(1):96–107. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM16(1)8.372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekren BY (2017) Graph-based solution for performance evaluation of Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval System. Int J Prod Res 55(21):6516–6526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1203076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ha Y, Chae J (2019) A decision model to determine the number of shuttles in a tier-to-tier SBS/RS. Int J Prod Res 57(4):963–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1476787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tappia E, Roy D, De Koster R, Melacini M (2017) Modeling, analysis, and design insights for Shuttle-Based Compact Storage Systems. Transport Sci 51(1):269–295. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2016.0699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Manzini R, Accorsi R, Baruffaldi G, Cennerazzo T, Gamberi M (2016) Travel time models for deep-lane unit-load autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system (AVS/RS). Int J Prod Res 54(14):4286–4304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1144241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ekren BY, Heragu SS, Krishnamurthy A, Malmborg CJ (2010) Simulation based experimental design to identify factors affecting performance of AVS/RS. Comput Ind Eng 58:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D’Antonio G, De Maddis M, Sauza Bedolla J, Chiabert P, Lombardi F (2018) Analytical models for the evaluation of deep-lane autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system performance. Int J of Adv Manuf Tech 94(5-8):1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0313-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bozer YA, White JA (1984) Travel-time models for automated storage/retrieval systems. IIE Trans 16 (4):329–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408178408975252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruno G, D’Antonio G (2018) Flexible reconfiguration of AVS/RS operations for improved integration with manufacturing processes. Procedia CIRP 78:196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca D’Antonio.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Description of the simulation model

Appendix A: Description of the simulation model

This section contains a high-level description of the simulation model used for validation of the developed approach.

1.1 A.1 Initialization model

A first model has been developed to generate 10 datasets to be used in the different repetitions of each configuration to be simulated: such datasets contain the rack content to be loaded at the beginning of the simulation and a list of ULs to be stored and retrieved.define rackCapacity = N_x⋆N_y⋆N_zfor i = 1:numberOfRepetitions

generate the empty rack structure

set storageCriterion: Closest

Channel

set retrievalCriterion: Random

for j = 1:rackCapacity

generate the jth UL

provide the jth UL with a

random UL type

define the jth UL position in

the rack

accordingly to the

storageCriterion

update rack content

end

for j = 1:fillRate⋆rackCapacity

require retrieval of a UL with

a random type

select the UL to be retrieved

accordingly to

the retrievalCriterion

make the rack position free and

update rack content

end

for j = 1:numberOfInvolvedULs

generate a new UL to be stored

generate a new UL to be

retrieved

provide the two ULs with a

random UL type

end save ith rack content

save ith list of storage and

retrieval ULs end

1.2 A.2 Simulation model

Here, the model that simulates UL storage and retrieval is presented: the results of the former model are used here as an input; the output mainly consists in the evaluation of the average cycle time and an array (which size is equal to rack capacity) listing the number of storage/retrieval activities occurred in each rack position: this is the basis to evaluate the probability distributions a, b, c.load rack configuration and initial contentload the list of storage and retrieval ULsload simulation configuration: storageCriterion,

retrievalCriterion, N_S, L, S, P, U define numberOfCycles = 20000/U define arrayOfInteractions = zeros(size: rackCapacity) for i = 1:numberOfCycles

identify the U items in the list

involved in

the actual cycle

decide the rack positions of ULs to

be stored

accordingly to the

storageCriterion

decide the rack positions of ULs to

be retrieved

accordingly to the

retrievalCriterion

start timeCounter

run vehicles movements to

store/retrieve the U

items, accordingly to cycle

specifications and

to the defined rack positions

end timeCounter

set cycleDuration(i) = timeCounter

increase by one unit the

appropriate value of

arrayOfInteractions end evaluate a, b, c based on arrayOfInteractions evaluate avgCicleDurationSimulation = mean(...

cycleDuration(1:numberofCycles)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Antonio, G., Chiabert, P. Analytical models for cycle time and throughput evaluation of multi-shuttle deep-lane AVS/RS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 1919–1936 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03985-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03985-8

Keywords

Navigation