Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling, planning, and scheduling of shop-floor assembly process with dynamic cyber-physical interactions: a case study for CPS-based smart industrial robot production

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the applications of industrial robots are expanding rapidly due to Industry 4.0 oriented evolutions, ranging from automobile industry to almost all manufacturing domains. As demands with rapid product iterations become increasingly fluctuant and customized, the assembly process of industrial robots faces new challenges including dynamic reorganization and reconfiguration, ubiquitous sensing, and communication with time constraints, etc. This paper studies the industrial robot assembly process modeling, planning, and scheduling based on real-time data acquisition and fusion under the framework of advanced shop-floor communication and computing technologies such as wireless sensor, actuator network, and edge computing. Taking the assembly of industrial robots as the specific object, the multi-agent model of industrial robot assemble process is established. Then, the encapsulation, communication, and interaction of agents with real-time data acquisition and fusion are studied. Based on multi-agent reinforcement learning approach, an intelligent planning and scheduling algorithm for industrial robot assembly is proposed, and a simulation case is presented to demonstrate the proposed model and algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (2017) IFR forecast: 1.7 million new robots to transform the world’s factories by 2020 - International Federation of Robotics. https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/ifr-forecast-1.7-million-new-robots-to-transform-the-worlds-factories-by-20. Accessed 11 March 2018.

  2. Monostori L, Kádár B, Bauernhansl T, Kondoh S, Kumara S, Reinhart G, Sauer O, Schuh G, Sihn W, Ueda K (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:621–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Monostori L (2014) Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagheri B, Yang S, Kao H, Lee J (2015) Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware Machines in Industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48:1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michniewicz J, Reinhart G (2016) Cyber-physical-robotics – modelling of modular robot cells for automated planning and execution of assembly tasks. Mechatronics 34:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seiger R, Keller C, Niebling F, Schlegel T (2015) Modelling complex and flexible processes for smart cyber-physical environments. J Comput Sci 10:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2014.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He N, Zhang DZ, Li Q (2014) Agent-based hierarchical production planning and scheduling in make-to-order manufacturing system. Int J Prod Econ 149:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kucukkoc I, Zhang DZ (2016) Mixed-model parallel two-sided assembly line balancing problem: a flexible agent-based ant colony optimization approach. Comput Ind Eng 97:58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park S, Kim J, Fox G (2014) Effective real-time scheduling algorithm for cyber physical systems society. Futur Gener Comput Syst 32:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Babiceanu RF, Seker R (2016) Big data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: a survey of the current status and future outlook. Comput Ind 81:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wittenberg C (2016) Human-CPS interaction - requirements and human-machine interaction methods for the industry 4.0. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49:420–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pirvu B, Zamfirescu C, Gorecky D (2016) Engineering insights from an anthropocentric cyber-physical system: a case study for an assembly station. Mechatronics 34:147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dworschak B, Zaiser H (2014) Competences for cyber-physical Systems in Manufacturing – first findings and scenarios. Procedia CIRP 25:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen W, Hao Q, Yoon HJ, Norrie DH (2006) Applications of agent-based systems in intelligent manufacturing: an updated review. Adv Eng Inform 20:415–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2006.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manupati VK, Putnik GD, Tiwari MK, Ávila P, Cruz-Cunha MM (2016) Integration of process planning and scheduling using mobile-agent based approach in a networked manufacturing environment. Comput Ind Eng 94:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barenji AV, Barenji RV, Hashemipour M (2016) Flexible testing platform for employment of RFID-enabled multi-agent system on flexible assembly line. Adv Eng Softw 91:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cupek R, Ziebinski A, Huczala L, Erdogan H (2016) Agent-based manufacturing execution systems for short-series production scheduling. Comput Ind 82:245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leitao P, Karnouskos S, Ribeiro L, Lee J, Strasser T, Colombo AW (2016) Smart agents in industrial cyber–physical systems. Proc IEEE 104:1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2521931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giordani S, Lujak M, Martinelli F (2013) A distributed multi-agent production planning and scheduling framework for mobile robots. Comput Ind Eng 64:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nouri HE, Belkahla Driss O, Ghédira K (2016) Simultaneous scheduling of machines and transport robots in flexible job shop environment using hybrid metaheuristics based on clustered holonic multiagent model. Comput Ind Eng 102:488–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S, Wan J, Zhang D, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput Netw 101:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pande V, Marlecha C, Kayte S (2016) A review- fog computing and its role in the internet of things. Int J Eng Res Appl 6:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu F (2012) The ZigBee based wireless sensor and actor network in intelligent space oriented to home service robot. Int J Commun Netw Syst Sci 05:280–285. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcns.2012.55037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Satyanarayanan M (2017) The Emergence of Edge Computing, vol 50, pp 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu L (2016) Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 3:637–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bumgardner VK (2017) Contributions to edge computing. Dissertation University of Kentucky

  28. Brucker P, Knust JS.(2006) Complex Scheduling

  29. Gabel T (2009) Multi-agent reinforcement learning approaches for distributed job-shop scheduling problems. Dissertation Universität Osnabrück

  30. Jiménez YM (2011) A generic multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for scheduling problems. Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Brussel

  31. Gomes ER, Kowalczyk R (2009) Dynamic analysis of multiagent Q -learning with ε-greedy exploration: International Conference on Machine Learning

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yifei Tong.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, Q., Tong, Y., Wu, S. et al. Modeling, planning, and scheduling of shop-floor assembly process with dynamic cyber-physical interactions: a case study for CPS-based smart industrial robot production. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 3979–3989 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03940-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03940-7

Keywords

Navigation