Skip to main content
Log in

A novel finite element method for the wear analysis of cemented carbide tool during high speed cutting Ti6Al4V process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present research, three typical cutting tool wear mechanisms (abrasive wear, adhesive wear, and diffusive wear) were taken into consideration in the FE simulation of cutting tool with a specific user-defined subroutine. Based on the influence of temperature on the cutting tool wear form, a novel wear rate model was built integrating Usui, Takeyama, and Attanasio wear rate equation. The high-speed cutting tests were carried out on Ti6Al4V to determine the proposed wear rate model constant. The cutting forces and rack face wear morphologies obtained from FE simulation match well with those from experimental cutting tests. Finally, the effect of cutting parameters on tool wear was studied by FEM. The simulation results show that the impact of the cutting speed on the cutting tool life is more significant than that of feed rate, and the preferred ranges of cutting speed and feed rate for extending cemented carbide cutting tool in high-speed dry cutting Ti6Al4V are 90–150 m/min and 0.10–0.20 mm/r, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sartori S, Taccin M, Pavese G, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2018) Wear mechanisms of uncoated and coated carbide tools when machining Ti6Al4V using LN2 and cooled N2. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:1255–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu HG, Zhang J, Xua X, Zhao WH (2018) Experimental study on fracture mechanism transformation in chip segmentation of Ti-6Al-4V alloys during high-speed machining. J Mater Process Technol 257:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu HB, Zhang SJ (2015) Effects of cutting conditions on the milling process of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2235–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ji CH, Li YH, Qin XD, Zhao Q, Sun D, Jin Y (2015) 3D FEM simulation of helical milling hole process for titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:1733–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosemar B, Machado ÁR (2013) Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures. J Mater Process Technol 213:1459–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplana B, Odelrosa S, Kritikosa M, Bejjania R, Norgrenab S (2018) Study of tool wear and chemical interaction during machining of Ti6Al4V. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 72:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rahman Rashid RA, Palanisamy S, Sun S, Dargusch MS (2016) Tool wear mechanisms involved in crater formation on uncoated carbide tool when machining Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:1457–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan YH, Hao ZP, Zheng ML, Yang SC (2016) Wear characteristics of cemented carbide tool in dry-machining Ti-6Al-4V. Mach Sci Technol 20(2):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang YF, Su YS, Li L, He N, Zhao W (2015) Performance of cemented carbide tools with microgroove in Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:1731–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Costes JP, Guillet Y, Poulachon G, Dessoly M (2007) Tool life and wear mechanisms of CBN tools in machining[J]. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47(7–8):1081–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takeyama H, Murata (1963) Basic investigation of tool wear. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 85(1):33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathew P (1989) Use of predicted cutting temperatures in determining tool performance. Int J Mach Tool Manu 29(4):481–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Attanasioa A, Ceretti E, Fiorentino A, Cappellini C, Giardini C (2010) Investigation and FEM-based simulation of tool wear in turning operations with uncoated carbide tools. Wear 269:344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Umbrello D, Filice L (2009) Improving surface integrity in orthogonal machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel by modeling white and dark layers formation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchkremer S, Klocke F, Lung D (2015) Finite-element-analysis of the relationship between chip geometry and stress triaxiality distribution in the chip breakage location of metal cutting operations. Simul Model Pract Theory 55:10–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zanger F, Schulze V (2013) Investigations on mechanisms of tool wear in machining ofTi-6Al-4V using FEM simulation. 14th CIRP conference on modeling of machining operations (CIRP CMMO), vol 8, pp 158–163

    Google Scholar 

  17. Altan T, Yen YC, Söhner J, Weule H, Schmidt J (2002) Estimation of tool wear of carbide tool in orthogonal cutting using FEM simulation. In: CIRP Int. workshop on modeling of machining operations, pp 149–160

  18. Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Rizzuti S (2008) 3D finite element analysis of tool wear in machining[J]. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Filice L, Micari F, Settineri L, Umbrello D (2007) Wear modelling in mild steel orthogonal cutting when using uncoated carbide tools. Wear 262:545–554

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Binder M, Klocke F, Doebbeler B (2017) An advanced numerical approach on tool wear simulation for tool and process design in metal cutting. Simul Model Pract Theory 70:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleischer J, Schmidt J, Xie L J, Schmidt C, Biesinger F (2004) 2D tool wear estimation using finite element method. In: Moisan A, Poulachon G (eds) Proceedings of the seventh CIRP international workshop on modeling of machining operations, Cluny, pp 82–91

  22. Yen YC, Söhner J, Lilly B, Altan T (2004) Estimation of tool wear in orthogonal cutting using the finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol 146:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalhori V (2001) Modelling and simulation of mechanical cutting. PH.D thesis, The Polhem Laboratory Division of Computer Aided Design Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sweden

  24. Chetan A, Narasimhulu S, Ghosh P, Rao V (2015) Study of tool wear mechanisms and mathematical modeling of flank wear during machining of Ti alloy (Ti6Al4V). J Inst Eng (India) 96(3):279–285

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cao ZY, He N, Li L (2008) A finite element analysis of micromeso-scale machining considering the cutting edge radius. Appl Mech Mater 11(12):631–636

    Google Scholar 

  26. Usui E, Shirakashi T (1984) Analytical prediction of cutting tool wear. Wear 100:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abukhshim NA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2006) Heat generation and temperature prediction in metal cutting: a review and implications for high speed machining. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46(7–8):782–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51275231), the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (NO. 1608085ME121), and Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics PhD short-term visiting scholar project (No. 190304DF06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honghua Su.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Su, H., Dai, J. et al. A novel finite element method for the wear analysis of cemented carbide tool during high speed cutting Ti6Al4V process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103, 2795–2807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03776-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03776-1

Keywords

Navigation