Skip to main content
Log in

High-throughput microstructure printing technology using inflatable thin membrane with microchannel

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-cost manufacturing technology for a micro-sized structure is receiving a lot of attention as human society is getting mixed with sensors and electronics. A template printing technology which forms micro-patterns by letting ink dried within a solvent permeable template is an attractive alternative of traditional costly micro-fabrication. However, low printing speed and lack of scalability have been recognized as a major drawback of this method. Here, we propose a novel printing machine using an inflatable polymer template. It is expected that thin membrane improves the printing speed due to its high permeation speed; however, the theoretical prediction and experimental proof of this approach has not been studied. A 450-μm thick membrane is fabricated by the casting polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) on a silicon master mold, fixed to a printer head, and inflated to contact with substrate uniformly. The permeation mechanism is investigated by using both of the numerical simulation and experiments and discovers that the diffusion in thin membrane obeys an analytical solution for Fick’s diffusion in steady state, while a conventional bulk template (10 mm) is in non-steady state. The printing system composed of pneumatic lines, a flash sintering unit, and a printer head holds the membrane is prototyped to ensure reproducibility of this novel method, five times faster printing speed compared to the ordinal method is confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gates BD, Xu Q, Stewart M, Ryan D, Willson CG, Whitesides GM (2005) New approaches to nanofabrication: molding, printing, and other techniques. Chem Rev 105(4):1171–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geissler M, Xia Y (2004) Patterning: principles and some new developments. Adv Mater 16(15):1249–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan S, Lorenzelli L, Dahiya RS (2015) Technologies for printing sensors and electronics over large flexible substrates: a review. IEEE Sens J 15(6):3164–3185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saengchairat N, Tran T, Chua C-K (2017) A review: additive manufacturing for active electronic components. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(1):31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvert P (2001) Inkjet printing for materials and devices. Chem Mater 13(10):3299–3305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Gans B, Duineveld P, Schubert U (2004) Inkjet printing of polymers: state of the art and future developments. Adv Mater 16(3):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park J-U, Hardy M, Kang SJ, Barton K, Adair K, kishore Mukhopadhyay D, Lee CY, Strano MS, Alleyne AG, Georgiadis JG, Ferreira PM, Rogers JA (2007) High-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nat. Mater. 6:782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Onses MS, Sutanto E, Ferreira PM, Alleyne AG, Rogers JA (2015) Mechanisms, capabilities, and applications of high resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Small 11(34):4237–4266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2013) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5):1721–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wan AB, Kukjoo K, Heejoo L, So-Yun K, Yulhui S, Dae-Young L, Yeob SJ, Jang Ung P (2015) High-resolution printing of 3D structures using an electrohydrodynamic inkjet with multiple functional inks. Adv Mater 27(29):4322–4328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerber M, Beddingfield C, O’Connor S, Yoo M, Lee M, Kang D, Park S, Zwenger C, Darveaux R, Lanzone R, Park K (2011) Next generation fine pitch Cu Pillar technology - enabling next generation silicon nodes. In: 2011 IEEE 61st electronic components and technology conference (ECTC), pp 612–618

  12. Orii Y, Toriyama K, Noma H, Oyama Y, Nishiwaki H, Ishida M, Nishio T, LaBianca NC, Feger C (2009) Ultrafine-pitch C2 flip chip interconnections with solder-capped Cu pillar bumps. In: 2009 59th electronic components and technology conference, pp 948–953

  13. Moga KA, Bickford LR, Geil RD, Dunn SS, Pandya AA, Yapei W, Fain JH, Archuleta CF, O’Neill AT, DeSimone JM (2013) Rapidly–dissolvable microneedle patches via a highly scalable and reproducible soft lithography approach. Adv Mater 25(36):5060–5066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim Y-C, Park J-H, Prausnitz MR (2012) Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64(14):1547–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demko MT, Cheng JC, Pisano AP (2010) High-resolution direct patterning of gold nanoparticles by the ic molding process. Langmuir 26(22):16710–16714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim E, Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1995) Polymer microstructures formed by moulding in capillaries. Nature 376:581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leng J, Lonetti B, Tabeling P, Joanicot M, Ajdari A (2006) Microevaporators for kinetic exploration of phase diagrams. Phys Rev Lett 96(8):84503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreau P, Dehmoune J, Salmon J-B, Leng J (2009) Microevaporators with accumulators for the screening of phase diagrams of aqueous solutions. Appl Phys Lett 95(3):33108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Randall GC, Doyle PS (2005) Permeation-driven flow in poly(dimethylsiloxane) ic devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(31):10813. LP–10818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duineveld PC, Lilja M, Johansson T, Inganäs O (2002) Diffusion of solvent in PDMS elastomer for micromolding in capillaries. Langmuir 18(24):9554–9559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kretschmer CB, Wiebe R (1949) Liquid-vapor equilibrium of ethanol–toluene solutions. J Am Chem Soc 71(5):1793–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mamedov AA, Aleskerov AM, Shikhaliev AY, Khalilov ShKh (1973) Variation of the viscosities and densities of carbon tetrachloride, ethanol, and their binary mixtures with temperature and concentrations, Viniti:1–8

  23. Yi-Ming S, Jack C (2018) Sorption/desorption properties of ethanol, toluene, and xylene in poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 51(10):1797–1804

    Google Scholar 

  24. Demko MT, Cheng JC, Pisano AP (2012) Rigid, vapor-permeable poly(4-methyl-2-pentyne) templates for high resolution patterning of nanoparticles and polymers. ACS Nano 6(8):6890– 6896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Terasaki N, Dorsey K, Makihata M, Pisano AP (2017) Micro printing using microfluidics for printed biodegradable devices in trillion sensing. ECS Trans 75(41):13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Demko MT (2012) High resolution additive patterning of nanoparticles and polymers enabled by vapor permeable polymer templates, UC Berkeley, ProQuest ID Demko_berkeley_0028E_12305, Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m5125xk2. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37n411xf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsutoshi Makihata.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makihata, M., Pisano, A.P. High-throughput microstructure printing technology using inflatable thin membrane with microchannel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103, 1709–1719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03672-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03672-8

Keywords

Navigation