Skip to main content
Log in

MR fluid-based novel finishing process for nonplanar copper mirrors

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential use of copper as metallic mirrors in a wide variety of industries has put an onus on producing super-finished surfaces of copper of different shapes and sizes. However, with un-controlled normal forces in traditional finishing process, it is difficult to finish copper to the order of nanometers. Moreover the diamagnetic nature of copper limits its finishing capability by several advanced magnetic-assisted finishing methods. In this research work, a novel approach of finishing nonplanar copper mirrors is explored using magnetorheological polishing fluid. A finishing tool based on electromagnet with solid rotating core and having an efficaciously slotted tip has been developed and mounted on a five-axis CNC setup. The solid spindle core and multiple slots at the tip improve the magnetic flux density, essential for finishing of diamagnetic copper workpieces, and grip the polishing fluid firmly during the finishing operation. The electromagnet-based finishing tool also aids in in-process control of finishing forces acting on the copper workpiece. During the finishing process, forces acting on the workpiece were recorded using dynamometer and analyzed to understand the material removal mechanism and the process physics associated with it. Two nonplanar copper workpieces (convex and concave samples) were finished using the new tool to produce mirror-like reflective surfaces. In two finishing cycles with varying magnetizing current, the surface roughness of two samples were reduced from initial values of 120.1 and 129.2 nm to final values of 40.3 and 43.2 nm for convex and concave samples respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Challita Z, Agócs T, Hugot E, Jaskó A, Kroes G, Taylor W et al (2014) Design and development of a freeform active mirror for an astronomy application. Opt Eng 53(3):031311. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.3.031311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Newswander T, Paquin RA (2017) Materials for optical systems. In: Ahmad A (ed) Optomechanical engineering handbook, second edn. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ebrahimi M, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi HR, Azimi M, Mirjavadi SS (2017) Correlating the microstructure to mechanical properties and wear behavior of an accumulative back extruded Al-Mg2Si in-situ composite. Tribol Int 115:199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mirjavadi SS, Alipour M, Emamian S, Kord S, Hamouda AM, Koppad PG, Keshavamurthy R (2017) Influence of TiO2 nanoparticles incorporation to friction stir welded 5083 aluminum alloy on the microstructure, mechanical properties and wear resistance. J Alloys Compd 712:795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirjavadi SS, Alipour M, Hamouda AM, Matin A, Kord S, Afshari BM, Koppad PG (2017) Effect of multi-pass friction stir processing on the microstructure, mechanical and wear properties of AA5083/ZrO2 nanocomposites. J Alloys Compd 726:1262–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jha S, Jain VK (2006) Nano-finishing techniques. In: Mahalik NP (ed) Micromanufacturing and nanotechnology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Da Silva MF, Shimizu K, Kobayashi K, Skeldon P, Thompson GE, Wood GC (1995) On the nature of the mechanically polished aluminium surface. Corros Sci 37(9):1511–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(95)00067-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhong ZW (2008) Recent advances in polishing of advanced materials. Mater Manuf Process 23(5):449–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910802103486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ein-Eli Y, Starosvetsky D (2007) Review on copper chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) and post CMP cleaning in ultra large system integrated (ULSI)- an electrochemical perspective. Electrochim Acta 52(5):1825–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han R, Sampurno Y, Philipossian A (2017) Fractional in-situ pad conditioning in chemical mechanical planarization. Tribol Lett 65(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-016-0803-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahajan KA, Sadaiah M, Gawande SH (2010) Experimental investigation of surface roughness on OFHC copper by diamond turning machine. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(10):5215–5220

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kordonski WI, Jacobs SD (1996) Magnetorheological finishing. Int J Mod Phys B 10(23n24):2837–2848. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979296001288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jha S, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(10):1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kordonski W, Shorey A (2007) Magnetorheological (MR) jet finishing technology. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 18(12):1127–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X07083139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadiq A, Shunmugam MS (2009) Investigation into magnetorheological abrasive honing (MRAH). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(7–8):554–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alam Z, Jha S (2017) Modeling of surface roughness in ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process. Wear 374-375C:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kala P, Kumar S, Pandey PM (2013) Polishing of copper alloy using double disk ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive polishing. Mater Manuf Process 28(2):200–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.746704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan DA, Alam Z, Jha S (2016) Nanofinishing of copper using ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2016-65974

  19. Khan DA, Jha S (2018) Synthesis of polishing fluid and novel approach for nanofinishing of copper using ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 33(11):1150–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1328112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kansal H, Singh AK, Grover V (2017) Magnetorheological nanofinishing of diamagnetic material using permanent magnets tool. Precis Eng 51:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan DA, Jha S (2017) Selection of optimum polishing fluid composition for ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) of copper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1056-9

  22. Khurana A, Singh AK, Bedi TS (2017) Spot nanofinishing using ball nose magnetorheological solid rotating core tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1–4):1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0166-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alam Z, Khan DA, Jha S (2017) A study on the effect of polishing fluid volume in ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 33(11):1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1364760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shukla VC, Pandey PM, Shevgaonkar RK (2015) Efficacious electromagnet design for ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing. Proceedings of the 17th Indian Society of Mechanical Engineers Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering, New Delhi, India, October 3–4

  25. Jayswal SC, Jain VK, Dixit PM (2004) Analysis of magnetic abrasive finishing with slotted magnetic pole. In AIP conference proceedings 712(1):1435–1440. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1766730

  26. Gulley GL, Tao R (2001) Structures of a magnetorheological fluid. Int J Mod Phys B 15(06n07):851–858. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979201005362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayden HW, Moffatt WG (1965) In: Wulff J (ed) The structure and properties of materials. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jain RK, Jain VK, Dixit PM (1999) Modeling of material removal and surface roughness in abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(12):1903–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00038-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jha S, Jain VK (2006) Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear 261(7–8):856–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stradling AW (1993) The physics of open-gradient dry magnetic separation. Int J Miner Process 39(1–2):19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(93)90048-F

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Jha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, Z., Khan, D.A. & Jha, S. MR fluid-based novel finishing process for nonplanar copper mirrors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101, 995–1006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2998-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2998-2

Keywords

Navigation