Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive modeling for the cryogenic cooling condition of the hard turning process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical model for the hard turning process under the cryogenic cooling condition. This numerical model was developed on the basis of the modified Oxley’s cutting theory with implementing the cryogenic cooling condition. The cooling effect of cryogenic coolant on the tool flank face was modeled as a forced convective heat transfer coefficient as a function of the Nusselt number. The heat generated in the primary and secondary deformation zones was also modeled using moving heat source technique. This model was validated with experimental works under cryogenic and dry conditions for oblique cutting. The minimum and maximum errors in predictions were 1.8 and 15.2% for cutting force (P1), 1.6 and 33.7% for thrust force (P2), and 2.3 and 7.9% for feed force (P3), respectively, under the cryogenic cooling condition. In the case of predicting the temperature at the thermocouple location, the minimum and the maximum errors of these comparisons were 2.0 and 30.5%. It was observed that the cryogenic coolant during the hard turning process reduces the thermal softening effect and in turn increases the cutting forces. In addition, the use of cryogenic coolant can increase the segmented angle (ϕseg) and segmented frequency. Flank wears were observed in both cryogenic cooling and dry conditions. LN2 decreases the length of the flank wear by 12.4~27.5%. In this study, there is the performance improvement of hard turning process by adopting cryogenic cooling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang Y, Liang SY (2005) Modeling of cutting forces under hard turning conditions considering tool wear effect, ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng 127:262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lahiff C, Gordon S, Phelan P (2007) PCBN tool wear modes and mechanisms in finish hard turning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23:638–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chou YK, Evans CJ (1997) Tool wear mechanism in continuous cutting of hardened tool steels. Wear 212:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sobiyi K, Sigalas I, Akdogan G, Turan Y (2015) Performance of mixed ceramics and CBN tools during hard turning of martensitic stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Konyashin IY (1996) Chemical vapor deposition of thin coatings onto Al2O3 indexable cutting inserts. Surf Coat Technol 85:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aslantas K, Ucun I, Cicek A (2012) Tool life and wear mechanism of coated and uncoated Al2O3/TiCN mixed ceramic tools in turning hardened alloy steel. Wear 274:442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Norouzifard V, Hamedi M (2014) Experimental determination of the tool–chip thermal contact conductance in machining process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 84:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Markopoulos AP (2013) Cutting Mechanics and Analytical Modeling. In: Markopoulos AP (ed) Finite Element Method Machining Processes. Springer, London, pp 11–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Muñoz-Escalona P, Newman ST (2013) State-of-the-art cryogenic machining and processing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26:616–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yildiz Y, Nalbant M (2008) A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:947–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP (2000) Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials. Wear 239:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong SY, Ding Y (2001) Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1417–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bermingham MJ, Kirsch J, Sun S, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2011) New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan AA, Ali MY, Haque M (2010) A new approach of applying cryogenic coolant in turning AISI 304 stainless steel. Int J Mech Mat Eng 5:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M (2007) Cutting temperature, tool wear, surface roughness and dimensional deviation in turning AISI-4037 steel under cryogenic condition. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:754–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh R, Zurecki Z, Frey JH (2003) Cryogenic machining with brittle tools and effects on tool life. Proceedings of ASME IMECE2003-42232. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2003-42232

  17. Umbrello D, Micari F, Jawahir IS (2012) The effects of cryogenic cooling on surface integrity in hard machining: a comparison with dry machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jawahir IS, Attia H, Biermann D, Duflou J, Klocke F, Meyer D, Newman ST, Pusavec F, Putz M, Rech J (2016) Cryogenic manufacturing processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:713–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang Y (2002) Predictive modeling of tool wear rate with application to CBN hard turning. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  20. Karpat Y (2007) Predictive modeling and optimization in hard turning, in: investigations of effects on cutting tool micro-geometry. Rutgers University-Graduate School, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davoudinejad A, Chiappini E, Tirelli S, Annoni M, Strano M (2015) Finite element simulation and validation of chip formation and cutting forces in dry and cryogenic cutting of Ti–6Al–4V. Procedia Manuf 1:728–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pu Z, Umbrello D, Dillon OW, Lu T, Puleo DA, Jawahir IS (2014) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic machining of AZ31B magnesium alloy. J Manuf Process 16:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rotella G, Umbrello D (2014) Numerical simulation of surface modification in dry and cryogenic machining of AA7075 alloy. Procedia CIRP 13:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rotella G, Umbrello D (2014) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic cutting of Ti6Al4V alloy. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bajpai V, Lee I, Park H (2015) FE Simulation of Cryogenic Assisted Machining of Ti Alloy (Ti6AI4V). Proceedings of ASME MSEC2015-9315 V001T02A028. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2015-9315

  26. Umbrello D, Caruso S, Imbrogno S (2016) Finite element modelling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic machining AISI 52100 steel. Mater Sci Technol 32:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X (1996) Study of the jet-flow rate of cooling in machining. Part 1. Theoretical analysis. J Mater Process Technol 62:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li KM (2006) Predictive modeling of near dry machining: mechanical performance and environmental impact. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  29. Oxley PLB (1989) The mechanics of machining. In: Oxley PLB (ed) An analytical approach to assessing machinability, Ellis Horwood Ltd, pp 136-182

  30. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics

  31. Su JC (2006) Residual stress modeling in machining processes, Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  32. Manjunathaiah J, Endres WJ (2000) A new model and analysis of orthogonal machining with an edge-radiused tool. J Manuf Sci Eng 122:384–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Waldorf DJ, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (1998) A slip-line field for ploughing during orthogonal cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 120:693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Waldorf DJ (1996) Shearing, ploughing, and wear in orthogonal machining, Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  35. Timmerhaus, KD, Flynn, TM (2013) Properties of cryogenic fluids. In: Timmerhaus, KD, Flynn, TM (eds) Cryogenic process engineering, Springer Science & Business Media, pp 13-38

  36. Huang Y, Liang SY (2003) Force modelling in shallow cuts with large negative rake angle and large nose radius tools—application to hard turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22:626–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaynak Y, Armin G, Ozkutuk M (2018) Experimental and numerical study of chip formation in orthogonal cutting of Ti-5553 alloy: the influence of cryogenic, MQL, and high pressure coolant supply. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:1411–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ayed Y, Germain G, Melsio AP, Kowalewski P, Locufier D (2017) Impact of supply conditions of liquid nitrogen on tool wear and surface integrity when machining the Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1199–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pusavec F, Lu T, Courbon C, Rech J, Aljancic U, Kopac J, Jawahir IS (2016) Analysis of the influence of nitrogen phase and surface heat transfer coefficient on cryogenic machining performance. J Mater Process Technol 233:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaynak Y (2014) Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun S, Brandt M, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2015) Effect of cryogenic compressed air on the evolution of cutting force and tool wear during machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 221:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jerold BD, Kumar MP (2012) Experimental comparison of carbon-dioxide and liquid nitrogen cryogenic coolants in turning of AISI 1045 steel. Cryogenics 52:569–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bagherzadeh A, Budak E (2018) Investigation of machinability in turning of difficult-to-cut materials using a new cryogenic cooling approach. Tribol Int 119:510–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang L, Yin J, Sun Y, Shen H, Gao C (2016) Chip formation mechanism in dry hard high-speed orthogonal turning of hardened AISI D2 tool steel with different hardness levels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 238:466–473

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch MS (2009) Characteristics of cutting forces and chip formation in machining of titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Joshi S, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2015) Microstructural characterization of chip segmentation under different machining environments in orthogonal machining of Ti6Al4V. ASME. J Eng Mater Technol 137:011005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hua J, Shivpuri R (2004) Prediction of chip morphology and segmentation during the machining of titanium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 150:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen L, Tai BL, Chaudhari RG, Song X, Shih AJ (2017) Machined surface temperature in hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sugihara T, Takemura S, Enomoto T (2016) Study on high-speed machining of Inconel 718 focusing on tool surface topography of CBN cutting tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the development of liquid nitrogen based cryogenic machining technology and system for titanium and CGI machining funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of Korea (No. 10048871) and by Mechatronics optimization of high speed and high accuracy machinery equipment funded by the Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung Wook Park.

Additional information

Research highlights

We developed the new predictive model of hard turning process with the cryogenic cooling.

Experimental validations of cutting forces and temperature were performed.

Morphologies of the chips were observed with the serrated type for all cutting conditions.

The LN2 increases the segment angle and the segment frequency.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.M., Kim, D.Y., Banerjee, N. et al. Predictive modeling for the cryogenic cooling condition of the hard turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99, 2877–2891 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2660-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2660-z

Keywords

Navigation