Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of crystallization characteristics and mechanical properties of polypropylene processed by ultrasound and conventional micro-injection molding

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound injection molding has emerged as an alternative production route for the manufacturing of micro-scale polymeric components, where it offers significant benefits over the conventional micro-injection molding process. In this work, the effects of ultrasound melting on the mechanical and morphological properties of micro-polypropylene parts were characterized. The ultrasound injection molding process was experimentally compared to the conventional micro-injection molding process using a novel mold, which allows mounting on both machines and visualization of the melt flow for both molding processes. Direct measurements of the flow front speed and temperature distributions were performed using both conventional and thermal high-speed imaging techniques. The manufacturing of micro-tensile specimens allowed the comparison of the mechanical properties of the parts obtained with the different processes. The results indicated that the ultrasound injection molding process could be an efficient alternative to the conventional process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attia UM, Marson S, Alcock JR (2009) Micro-injection moulding of polymer microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid 7(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tseng SC, Chen YC, Kuo CL, Shew BY (2005) A study of integration of LIGA and M-EDM technology on the microinjection molding of ink-jet printers’ nozzle plates. Microsyst Technol 12(1–2):116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Angelov AK, Coulter JP (2008) The development and characterization of polymer microinjection molded gratings. Polym Eng Sci 48(11):2169–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallrabe, U., Dittrich, H., Friedsam, G., Hanemann, T., Mohr, J., Müller, K., . & Zißler, W. (2002). Micromolded easy-assembly multi fiber connector: RibCon®. Microsyst Technol, 8(2–3), 83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang C, Yin XH, Cheng GM (2013) Microinjection molding of microsystem components: new aspects in improving performance. J Micromech Microeng 23(9):093001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whiteside BR, Martyn MT, Coates PD, Allan PS, Hornsby PR, Greenway G (2003) Micromoulding: process characteristics and product properties. Plast Rubber Compos 32(6):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen HN, Hocken RJ, Tosello G (2011) Replication of micro and nano surface geometries. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 60(2):695–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sorgato M, Masato D, Lucchetta G (2017) Effect of vacuum venting and mold wettability on the replication of micro-structured surfaces. Microsyst Technol 23(7):2543–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sha B, Dimov S, Griffiths C, Packianather MS (2007) Micro-injection moulding: factors affecting the achievable aspect ratios. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(1–2):147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Masato D, Sorgato M, Lucchetta G (2016) Analysis of the influence of part thickness on the replication of micro-structured surfaces by injection molding. Mater Des 95:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucchetta G, Sorgato M, Carmignato S, Savio E (2014) Investigating the technological limits of micro-injection molding in replicating high aspect ratio micro-structured surfaces. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 63(1):521–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Masato D, Rathore J, Sorgato M, Carmignato S, Lucchetta G (2017) Analysis of the shrinkage of injection-molded fiber-reinforced thin-wall parts. Mater Des 132:496–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lucchetta G, Masato D, Sorgato M, Crema L, Savio E (2016) Effects of different mould coatings on polymer filling flow in thin-wall injection moulding. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 65(1):537–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giboz J, Copponnex T, Mélé P (2009) Microinjection molding of thermoplastic polymers: morphological comparison with conventional injection molding. J Micromech Microeng 19(2):025023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michaeli W, Spennemann A, Gärtner R (2002) New plastification concepts for micro injection moulding. Microsyst Technol 8(1):55–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Michaeli W, Kamps T, Hopmann C (2011) Manufacturing of polymer micro parts by ultrasonic plasticization and direct injection. Microsyst Technol 17(2):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu W, Peng H, Jia Y, Jiang B (2017) Characteristics and mechanisms of polymer interfacial friction heating in ultrasonic plasticization for micro injection molding. Microsyst Technol 23(5):1385–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang B, Peng H, Wu W, Jia Y, Zhang Y (2016) Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of the viscoelastic heating mechanism in ultrasonic plasticizing of amorphous polymers for micro injection molding. Polymers 8(5):199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen G, Guo S, Li H (2002) Ultrasonic improvement of rheological behavior of polystyrene. J Appl Polym Sci 84(13):2451–2460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen J, Chen Y, Li H, Lai SY, Jow J (2010) Physical and chemical effects of ultrasound vibration on polymer melt in extrusion. Ultrason Sonochem 17(1):66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ávila-Orta C, Espinoza-González C, Martínez-Colunga G, Bueno-Baqués D, Maffezzoli A, Lionetto F (2013) An overview of progress and current challenges in ultrasonic treatment of polymer melts. Adv Polym Technol 32(S1):E582–E602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sacristan M, Planta X, Morell M, Puiggali J (2014) Effects of ultrasonic vibration on the micro-molding processing of polylactide. Ultrason Sonochem 21(1):376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grabalosa J, Ferrer I, Elías-Zúñiga A, Ciurana J (2016) Influence of processing conditions on manufacturing polyamide parts by ultrasonic molding. Mater Des 98:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michaeli W, Starke C (2005) Ultrasonic investigations of the thermoplastics injection moulding process. Polym Test 24(2):205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Negre Gubau P, Grabalosa Saubí J, Ferrer Real I, Ciurana QD (2015) Study of the ultrasonic molding process parameters for manufacturing polypropylene parts. Proc Eng 32:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma Z, Balzano L, Portale G, Peters GW (2014) Flow induced crystallization in isotactic polypropylene during and after flow. Polymer 55(23):6140–6151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Babenko M, Sweeney J, Petkov P, Lacan F, Bigot S, Whiteside B (2018) Evaluation of heat transfer at the cavity-polymer interface in microinjection moulding based on experimental and simulation study. Appl Therm Eng 130:865–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer, C., & Drummer, D. (2016). Crystallization and mechanical properties of polypropylene under processing-relevant cooling conditions with respect to isothermal holding time. Int J Polym Sci 2016

  29. Schrauwen BA, Janssen RP, Govaert LE, Meijer HE (2004) Intrinsic deformation behavior of semicrystalline polymers. Macromolecules 37(16):6069–6078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gao S, Qiu Z, Ma Z, Yang Y (2017) Flow properties of polymer melt in longitudinal ultrasonic-assisted microinjection molding. Polym Eng Sci 57(8):797–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Masato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masato, D., Babenko, M., Shriky, B. et al. Comparison of crystallization characteristics and mechanical properties of polypropylene processed by ultrasound and conventional micro-injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99, 113–125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2493-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2493-9

Keywords

Navigation