Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic signal-based tool condition monitoring in belt grinding of nickel-based superalloys using RF classifier and MLR algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With outstanding material removal ability and high finish quality, robotic belt grinding has great advantages in processing difficult-to-machine materials like nickel-based superalloys. Tool wear is a severe problem in such grinding processes; thus, detection of tool wear is critical to precision finishing of a surface profile. This work proposes a novel acoustic signal-based detection method that combines a random forest (RF) classifier and a multiple linear regression (MLR) model to detect different wear periods and evaluate the remaining grinding ability for robotic belt grinding of nickel-based superalloys. The correlation between grinding sound and belt conditions is established through experimental studies and signal analysis. Through mapping the acoustic features of grinding sound and conditions of grinding belts, the RF classifier and the MLR model are trained and applied in prediction of grinding belt conditions. The total prediction accuracy of RF classifier for distinguishing different wear periods is over 94%, and the mean absolute percentage error of MLR model for evaluating the grinding ability in accelerated wear period is less than 9%. The online detection method can be used as a basis for adaptive control of grinding parameters to achieve precision profile finishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J Mater Process Technol 134:233–253 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013602010427?via%3Dihub

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ezugwu EO (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(12–13):1353–1367 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890695505000544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang H, Gong ZM, Chen XQ, Zhou LB (2003) SMART robotic system for 3D profile turbine vane repair. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, ISSN 0268-3768 21(4):275–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700300032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Han XS, Wu TY (2013) Analysis of acoustic emission in precision and high-efficiency grinding technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9):1997–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4626-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blunt L, Ebdon S (1996) The application of three-dimensional surface measurement techniques to characterizing grinding wheel topography. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(11):1207–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(96)00041-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan KC, Lee MZ, Mou JI (2002) On-line non-contact system for grinding wheel wear measurement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inasaki I (1999) Sensor fusion for monitoring and controlling grinding processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(10):730–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700050125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen XQ, Li HZ (2009) Development of a tool wear observer model for online tool condition monitoring and control in machining nickel-based alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:786–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2003-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lachance S, Warkentin A, Bauer R (2003) Development of an automated system for measuring grinding wheel wear flats. J Manuf Syst 22(2):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(03)90010-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salgado DR, Alonso FJ (2007) An approach based on current and sound signals for in-process tool wear monitoring. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:2140–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi D, Gindy NN (2007) Tool wear predictive model based on least squares support vector machines. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:1799–1814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang L, Gao RX (2006) Condition monitoring and control for intelligent manufacturing. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F1-84628-269-1

  13. Sun J, Hong GS, Wong YS, Raghman M, Wang ZG (2006) Effective training data selection in tool condition monitoring system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(6):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schafrick R, Sprague R (2004) The saga of gas turbine material. Adv Mater Process 162(3):33–36 4:28-30

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weber H, Loladze TN (1986) Grundlagen des Spanens. VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Song S, Chen HB, Lin T, Wu D, Chen SB (2016) Penetration state recognition based on the double-soundsources characteristic of VPPAW and hidden Markov Model. J Mater Process Technol 234:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.03.002

  17. Zhu KP (2009) Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: a review and some new results. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning Journal 45(1):5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kleinberg E (2000) On the algorithmic implementation of stochastic discrimination. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(5):473–490. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.857004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning. Springer, New York, pp 316–321

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Powers DMW (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness & correlation. J Mach Learn Technol 2(1):37–63

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yan X, Su XG (2009) Linear regression analysis: theory and computing. World Scientific, pp. 1–2. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/6986

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Grinding Laboratory, 3M (Shanghai, China), for its support in conducting grinding experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqi Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Chen, H., Xu, J. et al. Acoustic signal-based tool condition monitoring in belt grinding of nickel-based superalloys using RF classifier and MLR algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 859–872 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2270-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2270-9

Keywords

Navigation