Skip to main content
Log in

Experiment and numerical simulations of a slug rivet installation process based on different modeling methods

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slug rivet interference-fit riveting is one of the advanced connection technologies, which has been widely applied in aerospace manufacture. In the fields of residual stress analysis, structural deformation analysis, load transfer mechanism analysis, and the assessment of the effects of process parameters on riveting quality, study accuracy needs increasingly accurate and comprehensive models. Since the simulation of riveting process is a particularly time-consuming case. The aim of this paper is to develop some appropriate FE models for the special applications with a compromise between model size, calculation time, and simulation precision. Different types of FE models have been established based on force-controlled approach and displacement-controlled approach. The comparison between different FE models is satisfactory in terms of riveting process and riveting quality control criterion. The study significantly deepens the comprehension of the slug rivet installation process. Subsequent research can select an appropriate model according to its special target. The study will pave the way for further investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang C (2011) Survey report of aircraft automatic assembly technology and equipment application. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology 19:54–55

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rooks B (2013) Automatic wing box assembly developments. Ind Robot 28(4):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holden R, Haworth P, Kendrick I, Smith A (2007) Automated riveting cell for a320 wing panels with improved throughput and reliability (sa2)

  4. Sarh B et al (2009) Aircraft manufacturing and assembly. In: Springer handbook of automation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

  5. Liu G, Huan HL, Ke YL (2014) Study on analysis and prediction of riveting assembly variation of aircraft fuselage panel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5–8):991–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aman F, Cheraghi SH, Krishnan KK, Lankarani H (2013) Study of the impact of riveting sequence, rivet pitch, and gap between sheets on the quality of riveted lap joints using finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(1–4):545–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheraghi SH (2008) Effect of variations in the riveting process on the quality of riveted joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(11–12):1144–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng C, Liao WH, Tian W (2015) Influence of initial fit tolerance and squeeze force on the residual stress in a riveted lap joint. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9–12):1643–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li YJ (1998) An analysis of riveting process by theoretical, nonlinear finite element and experimental methods. PhD Thesis, Wichita State University, Wichita

  10. Mu WQ et al (2010) An effective method of studying interference-fit riveting for 2117-T4 aluminum slug rivet. International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering, pp. 303–307

  11. Mu WQ et al (2010) Mathematical modeling for and simulation analysis of flush rivet pressing force. J Northwest Polytech Univ 28(5):742–747

    Google Scholar 

  12. Song DL et al (2012) An effective mathematical modeling for and simulation analysis of flush rivet pressing force of CFRP / AI components. J Northwest Polytech Univ 30(4):558–564

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shishkin SS (2010) Computation of the contact load in a rivet bond. J Mach Manuf Reliab 39(1):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lei CY et al (2017) Effect of riveting parameters on the quality of riveted aircraft structures with slug rivet. Adv Mech Eng 9(11):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu LX et al (2013) Semi-empirical research on automatic drilling and riveting process of headless rivet. J Northwest Polytech Univ 31(1):77–82

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang Z et al (2016) Investigation of riveting parameters influence on the riveted joints deformation during slug rivet installation. ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition V002T02A027

  17. Wang ZQ et al (2017) Optimization of riveting parameters using Kriging and particle swarm optimization to improve deformation homogeneity in aircraft assembly. Adv Mech Eng 9(8):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reinhall PG, Ghassaei S, Choo V (1988) An analysis of rivet die design in electromagnetic riveting. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 110:65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Repetto EA, Radovitzky R, Ortiz M, Lundquist RC, Sandstrom DR (1999) A finite element study of electromagnetic riveting. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gasser F et al (2015) Numerical and experimental investigation of aircraft panel deformations during riveting process. J Manuf Sci Eng 137:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shanghai Aircraft Manufacturing Company (2010) Rivet Criterion ZPS-XXX

  22. Müller RPG (1995) An experimental and analytical investigation on the fatigue behavior of fuselage riveted lap joints. The significance of the rivet squeeze force, and a comparison of 2024-T3 and Glare 3. Doctor thesis, Delft University of Technology

  23. Szolwinski MP, Farris TN (2000) Linking riveting process parameters to the fatigue performance of riveted aircraft structures. J Aircr 37(1):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Atre A (2006) A finite element and experimental investigation on the fatigue of riveted lap joints in aircraft applications. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

  25. Li G, Shi G, Bellinger NC (2006) Studies of residual stress in single-row countersunk riveted lap joints. J Aircr 43(3):592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blanchot V, Daidie A (2006) Riveted assembly modelling: study and numerical characterisation of a riveting process. J Mater Process Technol 180(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunbo Bi.

Additional information

The work described in this paper has been supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51775495), Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51521064), and Youth Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems (Zhejiang University)(SKLoFP_QN_1802).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, C., Bi, Y., Li, J. et al. Experiment and numerical simulations of a slug rivet installation process based on different modeling methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97, 1481–1496 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1990-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1990-1

Keywords

Navigation