Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation and analysis of single fiber pull-out tests through ANSYS and VC++

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to simulate the traditional investigation process of single fiber pull-out tests on quantificational basis, with an estimation of the critical length of embedded fiber and interfacial shear strength while comparing the stimulation results with empirical results. A finite element method (FEM) model of single fiber pull-out tests was established by using ANSYS parametric design language (APDL) program flow. Interfacial average shear strength was calculated and process of interfacial debonding was simulated. Single fiber pull-out tests were implemented to validate the FEM model. Results reveal that the maximum load estimated by the FEM varied as a function of both the length and critical length of the embedded fiber, and the calculated interfacial shear strength through FEM analysis is basically in agreement with the experimental results with a trivial difference of no more than 4.5%. A software was designed to simplify the simulation with respect to the analysis system of single fiber pull-out tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adusumalli R, Weber HK, Roeder T, Sixta H, Gindl W (2010) Evaluation of experimental parameters in the microbond test with regard to Lyocell fibers. J Reinf Plast Compos 29(15):2356–2367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Teuber L, Fischer H, Graupner N (2013) Single fibre pull-out test versus short beam shear test: comparing different methods to assess the interfacial shear strength. J Mater Sci 48:3248–3253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu L, Li L, Gao Y, Tang L, Zhang Z (2013) Single carbon fiber fracture embedded in an epoxy matrix modified by nanoparticles. Compos Sci Technol 77:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu L, Liu Y, Han Y, Wang Q (2015) Interfacial charring method to overcome the wicking action in glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite. Compos Sci Technol 121:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva LFM, Adams RD (2016) Special issue on adhesion, surface preparation and adhesive properties. Int J Adhes Adhes 67:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Müller V, Böhlke T (2016) Prediction of effective elastic properties of fiber reinforced composites using fiber orientation tensors. Compos Sci Technol 130:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bektaş NB, Akça M (2012) Stress analysis of functionally graded discs under mechanical and thermal loads: analytical and numerical solutions. Sci Eng Compos Mater 19:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gao X, Luo P, Fang G, Zhang S, Song Y (2017) Micro-XCT-based finite element method for predicting the elastic modulus of needle carbon-fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Sci Eng Compos Mater 24:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He Y, Davim JP, Ma Y’e (2016) 2D macro-mechanical FE simulations for machining unidirectional FRP composite: the influence of damage models. Sci Eng Compos Mater 23:659–670

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao C, Xiao J, Xu J, Ke Y (2016) Factor analysis of machining parameters of fiber-reinforced polymer composites based on finite element simulation with experimental investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:1113–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhandarov S, Mäder E (2014) An alternative method of determining the local interfacial shear strength from force-displacement curves in the pull-out and microbond tests. Int J Adhes Adhes 55:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Z, Liu S, Wang J, Liao H (2004) Review on synthesis and property of bisphenol type compound and epoxy resin. New Chem Mater 32:44–47 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu J, Cheng X (2005) Effect of rare earth modifier treatment on interlaminar shear strength of aramid/epoxy composites. Raremetal Mater Eng 34:1917–1920 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webb V, Hickner M, Baird D, Lesko J, Case S (2005) Durability and performance of press molded polymer composite monopolar plates. Sci Eng Compos Mater 12:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen S, Gao J, Han H, Wang C (2014) Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy-POSS reinforced-(biphenyl diol formaldehyde/epoxy hybrid resin) composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:609–617

    Google Scholar 

  16. Min S, Aijuan G, Liang G, Yuan L (2011) The effect of oxygen-plasma treatment on Kevlar fibers and the properties of Kevlar fibers/bismaleimide composites. Appl Surf Sci 257:3158–3167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garden L, Pethrick RA (2017) Critique of dielectric cure monitoring in epoxy resins—does the method work for commercial formulations? Int J Adhes Adhes 74:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miranda RA, Casebeer WD, Hein AM, Judy JW et al (2015) DARPA-funded efforts in the development of novel brain-computer interface technologies. J Neurosci Methods 244:52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianhua Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, K., Xu, Y. & Cheng, X. Simulation and analysis of single fiber pull-out tests through ANSYS and VC++. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96, 1591–1599 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0611-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0611-8

Keywords

Navigation