Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gompertz binary particle swarm optimization and support vector data description system for fault detection and feature selection applied in automotive pedals components

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents an improved fault detection by reference space optimization and simultaneous feature selection applied in a manufacturing complex process of automotive pedals components. Support vector data description (SVDD) one-class classification method uses a hypersphere with the minimum volume to find an enclosed boundary containing almost all target objects. Gompertz binary particle swarm optimization algorithm (GBPSO) is applied to optimize kernel hyperparameters for SVDD and simultaneously solve the feature selection problem. In order to justify and validate the results, also the genetic algorithm (GA) and binary particle swarm optimization algorithm (BPSO) are presented to compare the performances of the three approaches in terms of the misclassification function. The experimental results showed that the proposed approach can correctly select the influencing input variables in order to achieve an efficient fault detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sikandar A (2014) Artificial bee colony optimisation-based enhanced Mahalanobis Taguchi system for classification. Int J Intell Eng Inf 2:181–194

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chun-Chin H, Mu-Chen C, Long-Sheng C (2010) Intelligent ICA-SVM fault detector for non-Gaussian multivariate process monitoring. Expert Syst Appl Elsevier 37:3264–3273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keskes H, Brahama A, Lachiri Z (2013) Broken rotor bar diagnosis in induction machines through stationary wavelet packet transform and multiclass wavelet SVM. Electric Power Systems Research, Elsevier 151–157

  4. Lu D, Qiao W (2014) A GA-SVM hybrid classifier for multiclass fault identification of drivetrain gearboxes. IEEE, pp 3894–3900

  5. Bounsiar A, Madden M G (2014) Kernels for one-class support vector machines. IEEE Computer Society, pp 1–4

  6. Khanzode V V, Maiti J (2008) Implementing Mahalanobis-Taguchi system to improve casting quality in grey iron foundry. Int J Product Qual Manag 3:444–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reséndiz-Flores E O, López-Quintero M E (2016) Optimal identification of impact variables in a welding process for automobile seats mechanism by MTS-GBPSO approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghasemi E, Aaghaie A, Cudney E A (2015) Mahalanobis Taguchi system: a review. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 32:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu-ping G, Long-sheng G, Xiang-lai C (2014) Optimization on reference space of Mahalanobis-Taguchi system based on hybrid encoding genetic algorithms. In: International conference on management science & engineering, pp 62–68

  10. Su C, Hsiao Y (2009) Multiclass MTS for simultaneous feature selection and classification. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 21: 192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nunes I, Hernane D, Andrade R, Bartocci L, dos-Reis S (2017) Artificial neural networks: a practical course. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ren J (2012) ANN vs. SVM: which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Strathprints Institutional Repository 26:144–153

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ganganwar V (2012) An overview of classification algorithms for imbalanced datasets. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Tan X (2013) Neural information processing. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lei L, Xiao-Dan W, Xi L, Ya-Fei S (2015) Hierarchical error-correcting output codes based on SVDD. Pattern Anal Appl, Springer 19:163–171

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen F, Song Z, Zhou L (2013) Improved PCA-SVDD based monitoring method for nonlinear process. In: 25th Chinese control and decision conference. IEEE, pp 4330–4336

  17. Deng N, Tian Y, Zhang C (2013) Support vector machines, optimization based theory, algorithms, and extensions. Chapman

  18. Yin G et al (2014) Online fault diagnosis method based on Incremental Support Vector Data Description and Extreme Learning Machine with incremental output structure. Neurocomputing, Elsevier 128:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J, Sun Y (2013) Multivariate statistical process monitoring scheme with PLS and SVDD. In: International conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, pp 57–70

  20. Tax D M J, Duin R P W (2004) Support vector data description. Mach Learn 54:45–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin S et al (2008) Parameter determination of support vector machine and feature selection using simulated annealing approach. Appl Soft Comput 8:1505–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mu T, Nandi A K (2009) Multiclass classification based on extended support vector data description. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 39:1206–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, vol 4, pp 1942–1948

  24. Reséndiz E, Rull-Flores C A (2013) Mahalanobis-Taguchi system applied to variable selection in automotive pedals components using Gompertz binary particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 40:2361–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haixiang G, Yijing L, Yanan L, Xiao L, Jinling L (2016) BPSO-Adaboost-KNN ensemble learning algorithm for multi-class imbalanced data classification. Eng Appl Artif Intell 49: 176–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Assareh E, Behrang M A, Assari M R, Ghanbarzadeh A (2010) Application of PSO (particle swarm optimization) and GA (genetic algorithm) techniques on demand estimation of oil in Iran. Elsevier 35:5223–5229

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hassan R, Cohanim B, de-Weck O (2004) A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp 1–13

  28. Alkindy B, Al-Nuaimi B, Guyeux C, Couchot J, Salomon M, Alsrraj R, Philippe L (2016) Binary particle swarm optimization versus hybrid genetic algorithm for inferring well supported phylogenetic trees. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 165–179

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lhotská L, Macaš M, Burša M (2006) PSO and ACO in optimization problems. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning 4224:1390–1398

  30. Pal S K, Rai C S, Singh A P (2012) Comparative study of firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization for noisy non-linear optimization problems. I. J Intell Syst Appl 10:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sadeghi J, Mousavi S M, Niaki S T, Sadeghi S (2013) Optimizing a multi-vendor multi-retailer vendor managed inventory problem: two tuned meta-heuristic algorithms. ScienceDirect 50: 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mousavi S M, Hajipour V, Niaki S T, Aalikar N (2014) A multi-product multi-period inventory control problem under inflation and discount: a parameter-tuned particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:1739–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mousavi S M, Bahreininejad A, Musa S N, Yusof F (2014) A modified particle swarm optimization for solving the integrated location and inventory control problems in a two-echelon supply chain network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:191–206

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tavana M, Li Z, Mobin M, Komaki M (2016) Multi-objective control chart design optimization using NSGA-III and MOPSO enhanced with DEA and TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 50:17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mousavi S M, Sadeghi J, Niaki S T, Alikar N, Bahreininejad A, Metselaar H S (2014) Two parameter-tuned meta-heuristics for a discounted inventory control problem in a fuzzy environment. Inf Sci 276:42–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1997) A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 4104–4108

  37. Khanesar M A, Teshnehlab M, Shoorehdeli MA (2007) A novel binary particle swarm optimization. In: Mediterranean conference on control and automation

  38. Das S, Abraham A, Konar A (2008) Particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithms. Technical analysis, applications and hybridization perspectives, studies in computational intelligence, vol 116, pp 1–38

  39. Deep K, Chauhan P, Pant M (2012) Multi task selection including part mix, tool allocation and process plans in CNC machining centers using new binary PSO. In: IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, pp 10–15

  40. Holland J H (1975) Adaptive in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bhajantri L B, Nalini N (2014) Genetic algorithm based node fault detection and recovery in distributed sensor networks. IJ Comput Netw Inf Secur 12:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maulik U, Bandyopadhyay S (2000) Genetic algorithm-based clustering technique. Pattern Recogn Elsevier 33:1455–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gamarra M R, Quintero C G (2013) Using genetic algorithm feature selection in neural classification systems for image pattern recognition. Ingeniería e Investigación 1:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pezzella F, Morganti G, Ciaschetti G (2008) A genetic algorithm for the flexible job-shop scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res Elsevier 35:3202–3212

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Yan X, Liu H, Zhu Z, Wu Q (2016) Hybrid genetic algorithm for engineering design problems. J Comput Theor Nanosci 13:6312–6319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim J W, Kim S K (2016) Fitness switching genetic algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems with rare feasible solutions. J Supercomput Springer 72:3549–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Giaouris D, Finch J W, Ferreira O C, Kennel R M, El-Murr G (2008) Wavelet denoising for electric drives. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55:543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Aminghafari M, Cheze N, Poggi J M (2006) Multivariate denoising using wavelets and principal component analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:2381–2398

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Pal A, Maiti J (2010) Development of a hybrid methodology for dimensionality reduction in Mahalanobis–Taguchi system using Mahalanobis distance and binary particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 37:1286–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Neumann F, Witt C (2010) Bioinspired computation in combinatorial optimization. Natural Computing Series, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–19

  51. Reséndiz E, Moncayo-Martínez LA, Solís G (2013) Binary ant colony optimization applied to variable screening in the Mahalanobisaguchi System. Expert Syst Appl 40:634–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Karlis D, Saporta G, Spinakis A (2003) A simple rule for the selection of principal components. Commun Stat Theory Methods 32:643–666

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Corporación Mexicana de Investigación en Materiales, S.A. de C.V. (COMIMSA) Ciencia y Tecnología No 790 Col. Saltillo 400, C.P. 25290, Saltillo, Coahuila, México

    Jesús Alejandro Navarro-Acosta

  2. Division of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Department of Metal-Mechanical Engineering, The Technological Institute of Saltillo, Blvd. V. Carranza 2400 Col. Tecnológico, C.P. 25280, Saltillo, Coahuila, México

    Edgar O. Reséndiz-Flores

Authors
  1. Jesús Alejandro Navarro-Acosta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edgar O. Reséndiz-Flores
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Alejandro Navarro-Acosta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navarro-Acosta, J.A., Reséndiz-Flores, E.O. Gompertz binary particle swarm optimization and support vector data description system for fault detection and feature selection applied in automotive pedals components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 2311–2324 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0333-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0333-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation