Abstract
The purpose of the research conducted is to describe the consequences of variation in the welding industry and the effect it has on manufacturing productivity. The potential has shown to be hidden in unnecessarily stringent requirements and over-processing. This has been studied in steps: customer requirements, design and analysis, preparation, welding, and assessment. The effect of variation in each step has been analyzed including estimations of its productivity improvement potential. Theoretically, in a perfect situation, with customized requirements and eliminated variation, more than half of all welding could be removed. Such a reduction is certainly neither practical nor possible. However, a sensible, controlled reduction could still have a very high impact. The financial implications are therefore substantial. The improved productivity of the manufacturing resources could be used for business development and increased production. To be able to realize the potential, interdisciplinary efforts are necessary. Management across different functions need to agree on the intended product life and make decisions thereafter.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Björk T, Samuelsson J, Marquis G (2008) The need for a weld quality system for fatigue loaded structures. Weld World 52:34–46. doi:10.1007/BF03266615
Åstrand E, Öberg AE, Jonsson B (2013) Cost affecting factors related to fillet joints. In: Jármai K, Farkas J (eds) Des. Fabr. Econ. Met. Struct. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 431–435
Hobbacher AF (2009) The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joints and components—a comprehensive code recently updated. Int J Fatigue 31:50–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.04.002
Jonsson MB, Samuelsson PJ, Marquis PGB (2011) Development of weld quality criteria based on fatigue performance. Weld World 55:79–88. doi:10.1007/BF03321545
Marquis G, Samuelsson J (2005) Modelling and fatigue life assessment of complex structures. Mater Werkst 36:678–684. doi:10.1002/mawe.200500938
Marquis G, Björk T, Samuelsson J (2006) Toward a weld quality system for fatigue loaded complex structures—XIII-2103-06
Koufteros X, Lu G, Peters RC, Lai K, Wong CWY, Edwin Cheng TC (2014) Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: a mediational perspective. Int J Prod Econ 156:83–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.017
ElMaraghy HA, AlGeddawy T (2012) Co-evolution of products and manufacturing capabilities and application in auto-parts assembly. Flex Serv Manuf J 24:142–170. doi:10.1007/s10696-011-9088-1
Stenbacka N (2009) Svetsekonomi och produktivitet, 1st edn. Svetskommissionen, Stockholm
Weman (2003) Welding processes handbook. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, Eng, Boca Raton, FL
Hammersberg P, Olsson H (2010) Statistical evaluation of welding quality in production
Åstrand E (2015) A new innovative toolbox for lean welding of fatigue loaded structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7183-2
Nykänen T, Li X, Björk T, Marquis G (2005) A parametric fracture mechanics study of welded joints with toe cracks and lack of penetration. Eng Fract Mech 72:1580–1609. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.11.004
Gregory N (1992) Weld flaws—do they matter? TWI Bull. 1992
Shaw R (2011) Comparison of ISO 5817 quality criteria to that of national standards—surface imperfections, IIW Doc. XIII-2392-11
Miller DK (1997) Ensuring weld quality in structural applications part III. Weld. Innov. 1997
Wheeler DJ (2000) Understanding variation: the key to managing chaos. SPC PRESS, Knoxville, Tenn
Bergman B, Klefsjö B (2010) Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction, third edn. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
Masmoudi F, Bouaziz Z, Hachicha W (2007) Computer-aided cost estimation of weld operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:298–307. doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0463-0
Stemp J (2012) Fatigue assessment of a hauler bogie beam using FE analyses—master thesis work. Technical University of Munich, Munich
Ericson Öberg A, Martin J, Holm EJ, Hammersberg P, Svensson L-E (2012) The influence of correct transfer of weld information on production cost. In: Chalmers Publ. Libr. CPL, pp 295–302
Ericson Öberg A, Wikstrand S, Mattson V (2014) Impact of gaps on resource efficiency in heavy welding industry
Perez Sota E, Qollakaj K (2015) Production cost prediction of welded structures. Master Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
Ericson Öberg A, Åstrand E (2013) The subjective judgement of weld quality and its effect on production cost. In: Jármai K, Farkas J (eds) Des. Fabr. Econ. Met. Struct. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 621–626
Nykänen T, Marquis G, Björk T (2009) A simplified fatigue assessment method for high quality welded cruciform joints. Int J Fatigue 31:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.016
Olsson KE, Holm D, Jakopovic F (1997) High strength welded box beams subjected to torsion and bending fatigue loads—mode I and III stress intensity factors and crack growth predictions
Hoffenson S, Dagman A, Söderberg R (2015) Visual quality and sustainability considerations in tolerance optimization: a market-based approach. Int J Prod Econ 168:167–180. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.023
Dawes C (1992) Laser welding: a practical guide. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
Johnson M, Kirchain R (2009) Quantifying the effects of parts consolidation and development costs on material selection decisions: a process-based costing approach. Int J Prod Econ 119:174–186. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.02.003
Wahba (2010) Lean, integrated product & process development. http://slidegur.com/doc/1438316/lean--integrated-product-%26-process-development. Accessed 25 Aug 2015
Cozens M Fillet welded joints—a review of the practicalities—job knowledge 66. In: TWI. http://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/job-knowledge/fillet-welded-joints-a-review-of-the-practicalities-066/. Accessed 24 Nov 2015
Chou MC, Teo C-P, Zheng H (2008) Process flexibility: design, evaluation, and applications. Flex Serv Manuf J 20:59–94. doi:10.1007/s10696-008-9053-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Öberg, A.E., Åstrand, E. Improved productivity by reduced variation in gas metal arc welding (GMAW). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 1027–1038 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0214-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0214-4