Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon emission analysis and reduction for stamping process chain

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research is to contribute toward the development of a new mathematical model for predicting the carbon emissions and find the potential to control carbon emissions in stamping process chain. This study includes a review on the existing models of carbon emission analysis and reduction. Based on the existing models, the established models will track the visibility and process of carbon footprint in stamping process chain. In particular, the paper discusses the breakdown of the processes that contribute to the overall carbon emissions of a stamping process chain, such as electricity consumed by the equipment, lubricant fluid, and tool making. Finally, to meet the needs for low carbon manufacturing, a new energy matching and saving method for a group of hydraulic presses is discussed. On the basis of the investigated process chain, the method leads to the related energy and carbon emission reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. THE PAPER (2014) Carbon emissions in China in 2013 is the first in the world, speed up the adjustment of energy structure. http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1268328

  2. Branker K, Jeswiet J, Kim I (2011) Greenhouse gases emitted in manufacturing a product—a new economic model. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 60(1):53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingarao G, Ambrogio G, Gagliardi F, Di Lorenzo R (2012) A sustainability point of view on sheet metal forming operations: material wasting and energy consumption in incremental forming and stamping processes. J Clean Prod 29:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pell Research-Sheet Metal Industry Statistics Report (2011). http://www.pellresearch.com.html

  5. Fang K, Uhan N, Zhao F, Sutherland JW (2011) A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. J Manuf Syst 30(4):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi CWP, Rugrungruang F, Yeo Z, Gwee KHK, Ng R, Song B (2011) Identifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities through energy measurements in sheet metal part manufacturing. In: Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing. Springer, pp 389–394

  7. Cao H, Li H, Cheng H, Luo Y, Yin R, Chen Y (2012) A carbon efficiency approach for life-cycle carbon emission characteristics of machine tools. J Clean Prod 37:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao H, Li H (2014) Simulation-based approach to modeling the carbon emissions dynamic characteristics of manufacturing system considering disturbances. J Clean Prod 64:572–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li C, Tang Y, Cui L, Li P (2015) A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems. J Intell Manuf 26(5):911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Huang H, Hu D, Li B, Zhang C (2015) Greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions analysis of manufacturing of the hydraulic press slider within forging machine in China. J Clean Prod 113:565–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Du Y, Yi Q, Li C, Liao L (2015) Life cycle oriented low-carbon operation models of machinery manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod 91:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yi Q, Li C, Zhang X, Liu F, Tang Y (2015) An optimization model of machining process route for low carbon manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5–8):1181–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fereshteh-Saniee F, Montazeran M (2003) A comparative estimation of the forming load in the deep drawing process. J Mater Process Technol 140(1):555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zein H, El Sherbiny M, Abd-Rabou M (2014) Thinning and spring back prediction of sheet metal in the deep drawing process. Mater Des 53:797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Padmanabhan R, Oliveira M, Alves J, Menezes L (2007) Influence of process parameters on the deep drawing of stainless steel. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(14):1062–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiruvarudchelvan S, Lewis W (1990) Deep drawing with blank holder force approximately proportional to the punch force. Journal of engineering for industry 112(3):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Göschel A, Sterzing A, Schönherr J (2011) Balancing procedure for energy and material flows in sheet metal forming. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 4(2):170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Göschel A, Schieck F, Schönherr J (2012) Method for energy and resource balancing demonstrated as an example of the hot sheet metal production process. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 61(1):399–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Minav TA, Pyrhönen JJ, Laurila LI (2012) Permanent magnet synchronous machine sizing: effect on the energy efficiency of an electro-hydraulic forklift. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 59(6):2466–2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Minav TA, Laurila LI, Pyrhönen JJ (2013) Analysis of electro-hydraulic lifting system's energy efficiency with direct electric drive pump control. Autom Constr 30:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quan Z, Quan L, Zhang J (2014) Review of energy efficient direct pump controlled cylinder electro-hydraulic technology. Renew Sust Energ Rev 35:336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lovrec D, Kastrevc M, Ulaga S (2009) Electro-hydraulic load sensing with a speed-controlled hydraulic supply system on forming-machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(11–12):1066–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Halevi Y, Carpanzano E, Montalbano G, Koren Y (2011) Minimum energy control of redundant actuation machine tools. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 60(1):433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heitzig S, Sgro S, Theissen H (2012) Energy efficiency of hydraulic systems with shared digital pumps. International journal of fluid power 13(3):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huova M, Laamanen A (2009) Control of three-chamber cylinder with digital valve system. In: Scheidl R, Winkler B (eds). Proceedings of The Second Workshop on Digital Fluid Power 12–13 November 2009, Linz, Austria

  26. Locateli CC, Teixeira PL, De Pieri ER, Krus P, De Negri VJ (2014) Digital hydraulic system using pumps and on/off valves controlling the actuator. In: 8th FPNI Ph. D Symposium on Fluid Power. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V001T001A009-V001T001A009

  27. Scheidl R, Linjama M, Schmidt S (2012) Is the future of fluid power digital? Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 226(6):721–723

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ho TH, Ahn KK (2012) Design and control of a closed-loop hydraulic energy-regenerative system. Autom Constr 22:444–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin T, Wang Q, Hu B, Gong W (2010) Research on the energy regeneration systems for hybrid hydraulic excavators. Autom Constr 19(8):1016–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin T, Wang Q (2012) Hydraulic accumulator-motor-generator energy regeneration system for a hybrid hydraulic excavator. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 25(6):1121–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Triet H, Ahn K (2011) Comparison and assessment of a hydraulic energy-saving system for hydrostatic drives. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 225(1):21–34

    Google Scholar 

  32. Minav T, Immonen P, Laurila L, Vtorov V (2011) Electric energy recovery system for a hydraulic forklift-theoretical and experimental evaluation. Electric Power Applications, IET 5(4):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang T, Wang Q, Lin T (2013) Improvement of boom control performance for hybrid hydraulic excavator with potential energy recovery. Autom Constr 30:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neugebauer R (2005) Umform-und Zerteiltechnik. Verlag Wissenschaftliche Skripten, Chemnitz

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guidi A (1965) Nachschneiden und Feinschneiden. C. Hanser

  36. Brossog M, Bornschlegl M, Franke J (2015) Reducing the energy consumption of industrial robots in manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5–8):1315–1328

    Google Scholar 

  37. Choset HM (2005) Principles of robot motion: theory, algorithms, and implementation. MIT press

  38. NDRCC, 2012 (2011) Baseline emission factors for regional power grids in China. National Development and Reform Commission Climate Division. http://cdm.ccchina.gov.cn/WebSite/CDM/UpFile/File2720.pdf

  39. Paralikas J, Salonitis K, Chryssolouris G (2013) Energy efficiency of cold roll forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1271–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haihong Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, M., Huang, H., Li, X. et al. Carbon emission analysis and reduction for stamping process chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 667–678 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9732-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9732-8

Keywords

Navigation