Skip to main content
Log in

A novel hydroforming approach in manufacturing thin-walled elbow parts with small bending radius

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bending of a thin-walled tube with small relative bending radius is a hot topic which has aroused extensive attention in recent years. The main disadvantage of tube parts with small bending radius fabricated by available bending approaches is non-uniform wall thickness, large springback, poor fatigue performance, and wrinkle that is difficult to control for thin-walled tube bending. In order to solve this problem, a Bend-Bulge Forming (BBF) process combining rotary draw bending and hydroforming that realizes the fabricating of thin-walled elbows with small bending radius has been put forward in this study, and both FEM simulations and experiments were carried out. Meanwhile, in order to reveal the deformation behavior and the failure during BBF process, theoretical and FEM analysis were conducted by free expansion with bent tubes. The results show that the axial feeds play a prominent role in the hydroforming process. It can promote the tube wall outside of the bend contact with hydroforming die and avoid the excessive thinning. At the same time, the tube wall inside of the bend which is thickened during bending operation can be deformed sufficiently. Finally, the final parts fabricated by the BBF process have approximately constant wall thickness and high precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Zeng YS, Li ZQ (2002) Experimental research on the tube push-bending process. J Mater Process Technol 122:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kami A, Dariani BM (2011) Prediction of wrinkling in thin-walled tube push-bending process using artificial neural network and finite element method. Proc IMechE Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 255:1801–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Montazeri S, Gorji A, Bakhshi M (2016) A new method for compression bending of thin walled tubes in hydro-bending process. J Adv Manuf Technol 85:557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie WC, Teng BG, Yuan SJ (2015) Deformation analysis of hydro-bending of bi-layered metal tubes. J Adv Manuf Technol 79:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmetoglu M, Atlan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keeler SP, Backofen WA (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. ASM Trans 56:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming in the press shop. SAE Technical Paper No. 680093

  8. Kim SW, Song WJ, Kang BS, Kim J (2005) Analytical and number approach to prediction of forming limit in tube hydroforming. Int J Mech Sci 47:1023–1037

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang YM, Lin YK, Chuang HC (2009) Forming limit diagrams of tubular materials by bulge test. J Mater Process Technol 209:5024–5034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen XF, Li SH, Yu ZQ, Lin ZQ (2012) Study on experimental approaches of forming limit curve for tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen XF, Yu ZQ, Hou B, Li SH, Lin ZQ (2011) A theoretical and experimental study on forming limit diagram for a seamed tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 211:2012–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graf A, Hosford W (1993) Calculations of forming limit diagrams for changing strain paths. Metall Trans A 24:2503–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleemola HJ, Pelkkikangas MT (1977) Effect of predeformation and strain path on the forming limits of steel copper and brass. Sheet Met Ind 63:591–599

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stoughton TB (1999) A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 42:1–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T (2007) Effect of strain hardening behavior on forming limit stresses of steel tube subjected to nonproportional loading paths. Int J Plasticity 23:1260–1284

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011) Investigation on the strain-path dependency of stress-based forming limit curves. Int J Mater forming 4:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ge YL, Li X, Lang LH, Ruan SW (2016) Optimized design of tube hydroforming loading path using multi-objective differential evolution. In J Adv Manuf Technol DOI. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8790-2

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh H (2000) Computer simulation of tubular hydroforming. Tube Pipe J 11:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stange RR (1997) Tooling and methods for tube and pipe bending: the importance of proper equipment and proven techniques. Tube Pipe J 11:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wierzbicki T, Bao YB, Lee YW, Bai YL (2005) Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models. Int J Mech Sci 47:719–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lei LP, Kim J, Kang BS (2000) Analysis and design of hydroforming process for automobile rear axle housing by FEM. Int J Math Tools Manuf 40:1691–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim KJ, Kim K, Kang Y, Park JH (2013) Conical tube hydro-forming design of automotive instrument panel beams using computer aided engineering. Mat-wissuWerkstofftech 44:354–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lihui Lang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, D., Lang, L., Ruan, S. et al. A novel hydroforming approach in manufacturing thin-walled elbow parts with small bending radius. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 1579–1591 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9492-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9492-5

Keywords

Navigation