Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation into the effect of abrasive and force conditions in magnetic field-assisted finishing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study on the key process parameters in magnetic field-assisted finishing (MFAF), aiming to investigate the relations between the magnetic abrasives, polishing force, material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness. The experiments were conducted using a dual magnetic roller tool combining with a 6-axis robot arm. The effect of abrasive type and size on polishing force and MRR, wear of magnetic abrasives, surface roughness and surface morphologies obtained using different types of magnetic abrasives were evaluated quantitatively. The results show that the type of SiC-based magnetic abrasives had a higher MRR but lower polishing force than that of Al2O3-based magnetic abrasives. Due to the inability of carbonyl iron powder (CIP) carrier to hold large SiC or Al2O3 particles during the rotation motion of the magnetic roller tools, large particle size abrasives have a lower MRR as well as polishing force than small particle size abrasives. The wear of magnetic abrasives was demonstrated through scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of abrasive particles before and after polishing. The surface morphologies generated by the four different experimental conditions of magnetic abrasives were different although the surface roughness achieved a similar value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ezugwu EO (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(12):1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman M, Seah WKH, Teo TT (1997) The machinability of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 63(1):199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dudzinski D, Devillez A, Moufki A, Larrouquere D, Zerrouki V, Vigneau J (2004) A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(4):439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levy G, Schindel R, Kruth JP (2003) Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 52(2):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New York, pp. 1–3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8(3):215–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1191–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Ramirez DA, Martinez E, Hernandez J, Amato KN, Wicker RB (2012) Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 28(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuriyagawa T, Zahmaty MSS, Syoji K (1966) A new grinding method for aspheric ceramic mirrors. J Mater Process Technol 62(4):387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang ZZ, Guo J Research on an optimized machining method for parallel grinding of f-θ optics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5–8):1411–1419

  12. Walker DD, Brooks D, King A, Freeman R, Morton R, McCavana G, Kim SW (2003) The ‘Precessions’ tooling for polishing and figuring flat, spherical and aspheric surfaces. Opt Express 11(8):958–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo J, Morita S, Hara M, Yamagata Y, Higuchi T (2012) Ultra-precision finishing of micro-aspheric mold using a magnetostrictive vibrating polisher. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 61(1):371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo J, Suzuki H, Higuchi T (2013) Development of micro polishing system using magnetostrictive vibrating polisher. Precis Eng 37(1):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fähnle W, van Brug H, Frankena HJ (1998) Fluid jet polishing of optical surfaces. Appl Opt 37(28):6771–6773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jayswal SC, Jain VK, Dixit PM (2005) Modeling and simulation of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(5–6):477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Suzuki H, Kodera S, Hara S, Matsunaga H, Kurobe T (1989) Magnetic field-assisted polishing—application to a curved surface. Precis Eng 11(4):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yin SH, Takeo S (2004) A comparative study: polishing characteristics and its mechanisms of three vibration modes in vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(4):383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo J, Kum CW, Au KH, Tan ZEE, Wu H, Liu K (2016) New vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing (VAMAP) method for microstructured surface finishing. Opt Express 24(12):13542–13554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamaguchi H, Shinmura T (2004) Internal finishing process for alumina ceramic components by a magnetic field assisted finishing process. Precis Eng 28(2):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato T, Kum CW (2013) Surface Polishing Apparatus, WO/2013/172785

  22. Wang Y, Wu Y, Guo H, Fujimoto M, Nomura M, Shimada K (2015) A new magnetic compound fluid slurry and its performance in magnetic field-assisted polishing of oxygen-free copper. J Appl Phys 117.17:17D712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sidpara A, Jain VK (2013) Analysis of forces on the freeform surface in magnetorheological fluid based finishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 69:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Guo.

Additional information

Highlights

1. A dual magnetic roller tool combining with a 6-axis robot arm was used to conduct the experiments.

2. The type of SiC-based magnetic abrasives had a higher material removal rate (MRR) but lower polishing force than that of Al2O3-based magnetic abrasives.

3. Due to the inability of carbonyl iron powder (CIP) carrier to hold large SiC or Al2O3 particles during the rotation motion of the magnetic roller tools, large particle size abrasives have a lower MRR as well as polishing force than small particle size abrasives.

4. The wear of magnetic abrasives was investigated through scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of abrasive particles before and after polishing.

5. The surface morphologies generated by the four different experimental conditions of magnetic abrasives were different although the surface roughness achieved a similar value.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Tan, Z.E., Au, K.H. et al. Experimental investigation into the effect of abrasive and force conditions in magnetic field-assisted finishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 1881–1888 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9491-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9491-6

Keywords

Navigation