Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal identification of impact variables in a welding process for automobile seats mechanism by MTS-GBPSO approach

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work introduces the Mahalanobis-Taguchi System (MTS) to the research area of welding by the application of this methodology to the impact variable detection in a welding process for the automotive industry. The combinatorial optimization problem of variable selection is solved by the application of Gompertz Binary Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chand RR, Kim IS, Lee JH, Kim JS (2013) Prediction welding quality in multi-pass welding process using Mahalanobis distance method. Applied Mechanics and Materials 291-294:2688–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chand RR, Kim IS, Lee JH, Lee JP, Shim JY, Kim YS (2014) A study on welding quality of robotic arc welding process using Mahalanobis distance method. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies XV. Mater Sci Forum 773-774:759–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chauhan P, Pant M, Deep K (2011) Novel binary PSO for continuous global optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, AISC 130, pp 161–168

  4. Cudney EA, Hong J, Jugulum R, Paryani K, Ragsdell KM, Taguchi G (2007) An evaluation of mahalanobis-Taguchi system and neural network for multivariate pattern recognition. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 1(2):139–150

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cudney EA, Jugulum R, Paryani K (2006) Applying the mahalanobis-Taguchi system to vehicle handling. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 14(4):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cudney EA, Jugulum R, Paryani K (2009) Forecasting consumer satisfaction for vehicle ride using a multivariate measurement system. Int J Ind Syst Eng 4(6):683–696

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cudney EA, Paryani K, Ragsdell KM (2008) Identifying useful variables for vehicle braking using the adjoint matrix approach to the mahalanobis-Taguchi system. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 1(4):281–292

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deep K, Chauhan P, Pant M (2012) Multi task selection including part mix, tool allocation and process plans in CNC machining centers using new binary PSO. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pp 10–15

  9. Dhas J, Satheesh M (2012) Multiple objective optimisation of submerged arc weld process parameters using grey-based Taguchi method. Int J Ind Syst Eng 12(3):331–345

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particles swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science (Nagoya, Japan). IEEE Service Center, pp 39–43

  11. El-Banna M (2015) A novel approach for classifying imbalance welding data: Mahalanobis genetic algorithm (MGA). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engelbrecht AP (2002) Computational intelligence. Wiley

  13. Engelbrecht AP (2005) Fundamentals of computational swarm intelligence. Wiley

  14. Franken N, Engelbrecht A (2005) Particle swarm optimization approaches to coevolve strategies for the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 9:562–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jang SH (2011) A novel binary ant colony optimization: application to the unit commitment problem of power systems. J Electr Eng Technol 2:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (2001) Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kufmann Publishers

  17. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. IEEE International Conference on neural networks 4:1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1997) A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 5:4104–4108

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khanesar MA, Teshnehlab M, Shoorehdeli MA (2007) A novel binary particle swarm optimization. In: Mediterranean conference on control and automation

  20. Kim SB, Tsui KL, Sukchotrat T, Chen VC (2009) A comparison study and discussion of the mahalanobis-Taguchi system. Int J Ind Syst Eng 4(6):631–644

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marandi A, Afshinmanesh F, Shahabadi M, Bahrami F (2006) Boolean particle swarm optimization and its application to the design of a dual-band dual-polarized planar antenna. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1:3212–3218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pal A, Maiti J (2010) Development of a hybrid methodology for dimensionality reduction in mahalanobis-Taguchi system using mahalanobis distance and binary particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 37:1286–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pampara G, Franken N, Engelbrecht A (2005) Combining particle swarm optimisation with angle modulation to solve binary problems. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ragsdell KM, Cudney EA, Paryani K (2007) Forecasting consumer satisfaction using MTS and vehicle performance attributes. In: Proceedings of the Japan Quality Engineering Society, pp 1–4

  25. Rai BK (2009) Classification, feature selection and prediction with neural-network Taguchi system. Int J Ind Syst Eng 4(6):645– 664

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rai BK, Chinnam RB, Singh N (2008) Prediction of drill-bit breakage from degradation signals using mahalanobis-Taguchi system analysis. Int J Ind Syst Eng 3(2):134–148

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reséndiz E., Rull-Flores CA (2013) Mahalanobis-Taguchi system applied to variable selection in automotive pedals components using gompertz binary particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 40:2361–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadri J, Suen CY (2006) A genetic binary particle swarm optimization model. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 5:656–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shengqiang F, Hiroyuki O, Hidennori T, Yuichi K, Shengsun H (2011) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of GMAW welding falut based in Mahalanobis distance. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12:949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taguchi G, Jugulum R (2002) The Mahalanobis - Taguchi strategy - A pattern technology system. Wiley

  31. Zhang C, Hu H (2005) Using pso algorithm to evolve an optimum input subset for a svm in time series forecasting. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 4:3793–3796

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgar O. Reséndiz-Flores.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reséndiz-Flores, E.O., López-Quintero, M.E. Optimal identification of impact variables in a welding process for automobile seats mechanism by MTS-GBPSO approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 437–443 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9395-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9395-5

Keywords

Navigation