Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of friction models on FE simulation results of orthogonal cutting process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well-known that the reliability of finite element (FE) simulation results of cutting processes depends mainly on two factors: implementation of a well-defined constitutive model which can properly represent the severe deformation in chip formation process as well as the viability of the relation adopted to simulate the frictional condition at the tool-chip interface. In the current study, a systematic approach is presented to evaluate the performance of various friction models in three different FE commercial codes: Deform 2D, Abaqus/Explicit and AdvantEdge. The frictional condition was analysed for two uncoated cemented carbide-plain carbon steel combinations: K10/AISI 1045 and H13A/AISI 1080. The results indicated that approximately similar ranges of minimum average error in simulation responses can be achieved, independently of the FE code used for simulation of the chip formation process and for both tool-work material combinations. The reasons for this observation were critically discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo YB (2003) An integral method to determine the mechanical behavior of materials in metal cutting. J Mater Process Technol 142:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouzakis K-D, Michailidis N, Skordaris G, Bouzakis E, Biermann D, M’Saoubi R (2012) Cutting with coated tools: coating technologies, characterization methods and performance optimization. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:703–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Fiorentino A, Cappellini C, Giardini C (2010) Investigation and FEM-based simulation of tool wear in turning operations with uncoated carbide tools. Wear 269:344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malakizadi A, Cedergren S, Surreddi KB, Nyborg L (2013) A methodology to evaluate the machinability of Alloy 718 by means of FE simulation. Presented at the Advanced Manufacturing Engineering and Technologies NEWTECH, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binder M, Klocke F, Lung D (2015) Tool wear simulation of complex shaped coated cutting tools. Wear 330–331:600–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Özel T (2006) The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:518–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalhori V (2001) Modelling and simulation of mechanical cutting. PhD, Mechanical Engineering, Lulea University of Technology.

  8. Rech J, Arrazola PJ, Claudin C, Courbon C, Pusavec F, Kopac J (2013) Characterisation of friction and heat partition coefficients at the tool-work material interface in cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62:79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Svoboda A, Wedberg D, Lindgren LE (2010) Simulation of metal cutting using a physically based plasticity model. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandrasekaran H, M’Saoubi R, Chazal H (2005) Modelling of material flow stress in chip formation process from orthogonal milling and split Hopkinson bar tests. Mach Sci Technol 9:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malakizadi A, Cedergren S, Sadik I, Nyborg L (2016) Inverse identification of flow stress in metal cutting process using Response Surface Methodology. Simul Model Pract Theory 60:40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ulutan D and Özel T (2013) Determination of constitutive material model parameters in fe-based machining simulations of Ti-6Al-4V and IN-100 alloys: an inverse methodology. Proc NAMRI/SME. 41.

  13. Daoud M, Jomaa W, Chatelain JF, Bouzid A (2015) A machining-based methodology to identify material constitutive law for finite element simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2019–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Del Prete A, Filice L, Umbrello D (2013) Numerical simulation of machining nickel-based alloys. Procedia CIRP 8:540–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malakizadi A, Sadik I, Nyborg L (2013) Wear mechanism of CBN inserts during machining of bimetal aluminum-grey cast iron engine block. Procedia CIRP 8:188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu D, Feng P, Li W, Ma Y (2015) An improved material constitutive model for simulation of high-speed cutting of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy with high accuracy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1043–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Y, Zhu W (2014) Study on cutting temperature during milling of titanium alloy based on FEM and experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:1511–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chandrasekaran H, Kapoor DV (1965) Photoelastic analysis of tool-chip interface stresses. J Eng Ind 87:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Childs THC (2006) Friction modelling in metal cutting. Wear 260:310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zemzemi F, Rech J, Ben Salem W, Dogui A, Kapsa P (2009) Identification of a friction model at tool/chip/workpiece interfaces in dry machining of AISI4142 treated steels. J Mater Process Technol 209:3978–3990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rech J, Claudin C, D’Eramo E (2009) Identification of a friction model—application to the context of dry cutting of an AISI 1045 annealed steel with a TiN-coated carbide tool. Tribol Int 42:738–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smolenicki D, Boos J, Kuster F, Roelofs H, Wyen CF (2014) In-process measurement of friction coefficient in orthogonal cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merchant ME (1945) Mechanics of the metal cutting process. I. orthogonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys 16:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Usui E, Kikuchi K, Hoshi K (1964) The theory of plasticity applied to machining with cut-away tools. J Eng Ind 86:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atkins T (2015) Prediction of sticking and sliding lengths on the rake faces of tools using cutting forces. Int J Mech Sci 91:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zorev NN (1966) Metal cutting mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hedenqvist P, Olsson M (1991) Sliding wear testing of coated cutting tool materials. Tribol Int 24:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Puls H, Klocke F, Lung D (2014) Experimental investigation on friction under metal cutting conditions. Wear 310:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hosseinkhani K, Ng E (2015) A combined empirical and numerical approach for tool wear prediction in machining. Procedia CIRP 31:304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hosseinkhani K, Ng E (2013) Analysis of the cutting mechanics under the influence of worn tool geometry. Procedia CIRP 8:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bil H, Kılıç SE, Tekkaya AE (2004) A comparison of orthogonal cutting data from experiments with three different finite element models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:933–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arrazola PJ, Villar A, Ugarte D, Marya S (2007) Serrated chip prediction in finite element modeling of the chip formation process. Mach Sci Technol 11:367–390

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vaz M Jr, Owen DRJ, Kalhori V, Lundblad M, Lindgren LE (2007) Modelling and simulation of machining processes. Arch Comput Methods Eng 14:173–204

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Shi B, Attia H (2009) Modeling the thermal and tribological processes at the tool-chip interface in machining. Mach Sci Technol 13:210–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Puls H, Klocke F, and Veselovac D (2015) FEM-based prediction of heat partition in dry metal cutting of AISI 1045. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 1–9.

  36. Arrazola PJ, Özel TR (2010) Investigations on the effects of friction modeling in finite element simulation of machining. Int J Mech Sci 52:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Metal cutting. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  38. Iqbal SA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2007) Characterization of machining of AISI 1045 steel over a wide range of cutting speeds. Part 1: investigation of contact phenomena. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Finnie I and S. M. C. (1956) The friction process in metal cutting. Transactions of ASME 78. 78:1649–1657.

  40. Shirakashi T and U. E. (1973) Friction characteristics on tool face in metal machining. J Japan Soc Precis Eng. 39:966–972.

  41. Childs T, Maekawa K, Obikawa T, Yamane Y (2000) Metal machining: theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Puls H, Klocke F, Lung D (2012) A new experimental methodology to analyse the friction behaviour at the tool-chip interface in metal cutting. Prod Eng 6:349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bordin A, Imbrogno S, Rotella G, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A, Umbrello D (2015) Finite element simulation of semi-finishing turning of electron beam melted Ti6Al4V under Dry and cryogenic cooling. Procedia CIRP 31:551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jaspers SPFC (1999) Metal cutting mechanics and material behavior. PhD Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.

  45. Demuth H and Beale M (1993) Neural network toolbox for use with MATLAB. MathWorks.

  46. Marusich TD, Ortiz M (1995) Modelling and simulation of high-speed machining. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:3675–3694

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang J, Gadala MS (1997) Formulation and survey of ALE method in nonlinear solid mechanics. Finite Elem Anal Des 24:253–269

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Halim SMT (2008) Finite element modeling of the orthogonal metal cutting process: modeling the effects of coefficient of friction and tool holding structure on cutting forces and chip thickness. PhD, McMaster University.

  49. Klocke F (2011) Manufacturing processing I: cutting, RWTH ed.: Springerlink.

  50. Guo Z, Saunders N, Schillé JP, Miodownik AP (2009) Material properties for process simulation. Mater Sci Eng A 499:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2015) 3-D finite element process simulation of micro-end milling Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy: experimental validations on chip flow and tool wear. J Mater Process Technol 221:128–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rotella G, Dillon OW Jr, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2013) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in turning of AA7075-T651 alloy. J Manuf Process 15:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jafarian F, Imaz Ciaran M, Umbrello D, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Amirabadi H (2014) Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes. Int J Mech Sci 88:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sekhon GS, Chenot JL (1993) Numerical simulation of continuous chip formation during non-steady orthogonal cutting. Eng Comput 10:31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Iqbal SA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2007) Characterization of the machining of AISI 1045 steel over a wide range of cutting speeds—part 2: evaluation of flow stress models and interface friction distribution schemes. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221:917–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Klocke F, Raedt HW, Hoppe S (2001) 2D-FEM simulation of the orthogonal high speed cutting process. Mach Sci Technol 5:323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ng EG, Aspinwall DK, Brazil D, Monaghan J (1999) Modelling of temperature and forces when orthogonally machining hardened steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:885–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bailey JA (1975) Friction in metal machining—mechanical aspects. Wear 31:243–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials and Manufacturing Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Amir Malakizadi & Lars Nyborg

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4L7, Canada

    Keyvan Hosseinkhani & E. Ng

  3. Department of Engineering Innovation, University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, LE, Italy

    Emilia Mariano & Antonio Del Prete

Authors
  1. Amir Malakizadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keyvan Hosseinkhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emilia Mariano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antonio Del Prete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lars Nyborg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Malakizadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malakizadi, A., Hosseinkhani, K., Mariano, E. et al. Influence of friction models on FE simulation results of orthogonal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 3217–3232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9023-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9023-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation