Skip to main content
Log in

Exploiting neural PCA and Fisher discriminate analysis for FDI system

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major goal of this paper is the description of a fault detection and isolation system. Such a system is geared to the complex processes through the combination of the neural networks, Fisher discriminate analysis and the principal component analysis. The corner stone of this work is the application of a self-associative neural network to the nonlinear PCA for fault detection by starting with a various measurement multivariable matrix stemming from a complex industrial process. FDA and PLS are, then, used to identify the directions of the detected faults through the classification of the groups with and without faults. To isolate these faults is to recognize the variables that are the cause of these faults. This is attained by calculating the contribution; in other words, the variables having the largest contribution with regard to the others are considered defective. This statistical approach is authenticated on a pastry production process and gives good results. By comparing FDI with other methods, we can perceive that our approach gives more reliable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yan Liu & al, “Nonlinear dynamic quality-related process monitoring based on dynamic total kernel PLS”, Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA) June 29 2014-July 4 2014

  2. Zhou D, Li G (2010) “Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring”. AIChE J 56(1):168–178

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ines J (2015) “Online process monitoring using a new PCMD index”. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5):947–957

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fard N, Xu H, Fan Y (2016) “A unique solution for principal component analysis-based multi-response optimization problems”. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1):697–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jebril HC, Ouni K, Nabli L (2015) Detecting and analyzing QRS complex using automatic tools. Int J Biomed Eng Technol Inderscience. in press

  6. Xu Y, Goodacre R (2012) “Multiblock principal component analysis: an efficient tool for analyzing metabolomics data which contain two influential factors”. Metabolomics (springer) 8(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molloy M, Martin EB “Application of multiway principal component analysis for identification of process improvements in pharmaceutical manufacture”, 10th IFAC International Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems, Mumbai, India, December 2013, 283–288

  8. Hu Z et al (2014) Adaptive PCA based fault diagnosis scheme in imperial smelting process. Isa Trans ICCA 2013 53(5):1446–1455

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shengkun X, Sridhar K (2013) “Dynamic principal component analysis with nonoverlapping moving window and its applications to epileptic EEG classification”. Sci World J sHindawi 2014:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu Z et al (2012) “A simplified recursive dynamic PCA based monitoring scheme for imperial smelting process”. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 8(4):2551–2561

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jebril HC, Ouni K (2015) Nonlinear system monitoring using multiscaled principal components analysis based on neural network. Int J Model Identif Control. in press

  12. Chakour C, Harkat MF, Djeghaba M (2015) New adaptive kernel principal component analysis for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring. Appl Math Inf Sci 9(4):1833–1845

    Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Ani MS, Al-Waisy AS (2011) Multi-view face detection based on kernel principal component analysis and kernel support vector techniques. Int J Soft Comp (IJSC) 2(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramahaleomiarantsoa &al, “Performances of the PCA method in electrical machines diagnosis using Matlab”, INTECH (chapter 4, 2012), pp.69-87

  15. Liu X et al (2011) “Application of nonlinear PCA for fault detection in polymer extrusion processes”. Sch Electron Electr Eng Comput Sci 20(6):1141–1148

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okba Taouali et al. (2015) New fault detection method based on reduced kernel principal component analysis (RKPCA). Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 1-6

  17. Halligan GR, Jagannathan S (2011) PCA-based fault isolation and prognosis with application to pump. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5):699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyajima H, Shigei S, Shii T. Numerical evaluation of clustering methods with kernel PCA, Chapter: convergence and hybrid information technology. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6935: 677–684

  19. Gonzalez R, Huang B, Lau E (2015) “Process monitoring using kernel density estimation and Bayesian networking with an industrial case study”. ISA Trans 58:330–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elaissi I et al (2013) Online prediction model based on the SVD-KPCA method. ISA Trans 52(1):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qiu J et al (2012) “Neural network implementations for PCA and its extensions”. Hindawi Artif Intell 2012:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  22. Balas CE, Levent Koç M, Tür R (2010) “Artificial neural networks based on principal component analysis, fuzzy systems and fuzzy neural networks for preliminary design of rubble mound breakwaters”. Science Direct:Appl Ocean Res 32(4):425–433

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou J et al (2014) “Fault detection and identification spanning multiple processes by integrating PCA with neural network”. Science Direct:Appl Soft Comput 14:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan KK et al (2010) “Adaptive multiple minor directions extraction in parallel using a PCA neural network”. ScienceDirect: Theor Comput Sci 411(48):4200–4215

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu R, Li Z (2012) The application of the PCA based on neural network in modeling study of P-xylene oxidative side-reaction. ScienceDirect: Physics Procedia 25:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert J and Ata kaban, “Compressed Fisher linear discriminant analysis: classification of randomly projected data”, Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, New York, NY, USA ©2010, Pages 1119–1128

  27. Lê Cao K-H, Boitard S, Besse P (2011) Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problems. BMC Bioinformatics. 1–16

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanen Chaouch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaouch, H., Ouni, K. & Nabli, L. Exploiting neural PCA and Fisher discriminate analysis for FDI system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87, 1183–1191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8549-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8549-9

Keywords

Navigation