Skip to main content
Log in

3D modelling of kinematic fields in the cutting area: application to milling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work presented in this article deals with modelling the milling process. The exact position of the cutting edge within the modelling space is determined according to the different angles of orientation during milling, κ r , γ 0, and λ s as reported by Albert et al. (Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:843–854, 2011), the cutting edge angle, the rake angle by Merchant (J Appl Phys 16:267–275, 1945) and Oxley (International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research 1:89–97, 1961), and the cutting edge inclination angle, respectively. For each insert position, the kinematic torsor is determined and any changes are analyzed. The instantaneous variation in kinematic and geometric cutting parameters is determined in the case of end milling with a milling tool with cutting inserts at several representative points on the cutting edge. These parameters represent the input data for an orthogonal cutting model at the point of the cutting edge being considered. The kinematic analysis shows variation of the vector velocity along the cutting edge and variation of the instantaneous feed for a tool rotation. If we consider an orthogonal configuration cutting model for each point of the cutting edge, these variations contribute to define different input data for the orthogonal configuration cutting model (cutting velocity and feed). The results of the cutting force and tangential forces are dependent of the kinematic description along the cutting edge. In a future work, we will discuss the generation of strain and strain rates gradients due to the variation of the velocities along the cutting edge. The variation in linear speed due to the rotation of the tool, the feed speed, and a combination of the two, influences the cutting angle, the clearance angle, and the instantaneous cutting speed V corth. Extra input into the orthogonal cutting model is instantaneous feed. This is determined analytically, based on a geometric representation of the area covered by the tool. The different calculation approaches will be described in this paper with a sensitivity study of the different cutting parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engin S, Altintas Y (2001) Mechanics and dynamics of general milling cutters. Part II: inserted cutters. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2213–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saï L, Bouzid W, Zghal A (2008) Chip thickness analysis for different tool motions: for adaptive feed rate. J Mater Process Technol 204:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert G, Laheurte R, K’Nevez J-Y, Darnis P, Cahuc O (2011) Experimental milling moment model in orthogonal cutting condition: to an accurate energy balance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:843–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaymakci M, Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2012) Unified cutting force model for turning, boring, drilling and milling operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 54–55:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Altintas Y, Kersting P, Biermann D, Budak E, Denkena B, Lazoglu I (2014) Virtual process systems for part machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:585–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engin S, Altintas Y (2001) Mechanics and dynamics of general milling cutters. Part I: helical end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2195–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fontaine M (2004) Modélisation thermomécanique du fraisage de forme et validation expérimentale, in, Université de Metz. pp. 261

  8. Ben M (2012) Analyse des mécanismes de coupe en fraisage avec fraises à bout sphériques. In :Tunisie : École Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Sfax. pp. 190

  9. Yousfi W (2014) 3D kinematic fields studies in milling. Proceedings in Manufacturing Systems 9

  10. Li HZ, Liu K, Li XP (2001) A new method for determining the undeformed chip thickness in milling. J Mater Process Technol 113:378–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spiewak S (1995) An improved model of the chip thickness in milling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martellotti ME (1941) An analysis of the milling process. Transactions of ASME 63

  13. Martellotti ME (1945) An analysis of the milling process. Part II: down milling. Transactions of ASME 67

  14. Merchant ME (1945) Mechanics of the metal cutting process. I. Orthogonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys 16:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oxley PLB (1961) Mechanics of metal cutting. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research 1:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Yousfi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousfi, W., Laheurte, R., Darnis, P. et al. 3D modelling of kinematic fields in the cutting area: application to milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 2735–2745 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8396-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8396-8

Keywords

Navigation