Skip to main content
Log in

Springback compensation of automotive panel based on three-dimensional scanning and reverse engineering

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method to compensate for the springback of a formed part was introduced in this study. The development of stamping tools for the rear reinforcement plate of a door panel was used for the experiment. A three-dimensional (3D) scanner was utilized to scan the formed part. Compared with the design model, the deviation and springback angle of the formed part were obtained. Furthermore, the inspection results measured by a traditional special fixture were compared with the results of the 3D scanner. Finally, the 3D scanning data were used to compensate tool surfaces, and the tools were remanufactured on the basis of the compensated tool surfaces. The final stamping parts were measured by a special fixture after die tryout. The inspection results demonstrated that 15 of 18 measuring points can satisfy the geometrical tolerances, thus indicating that the qualified rate of this product can reach 83.33 % the first time the springback is compensated by using 3D scanning method. The results prove that 3D scanning data is more accurate and complete than the traditional method, and the springback compensation by this method can effectively reduce die tryout time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lingbeek R, Huetink J, Ohnimus S, Petzoldt M, Weiher J (2005) The development of a finite elements based springback compensation tool for sheet metal products. J Mater Process Technol 169(1):115–125. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen P, Koc M (2007) Simulation of springback variation in forming of advanced high strength steels. J Mater Process Technol 190(1-3):189–198. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagoner RH, Lim H, Lee MG (2013) Advanced issues in springback. Int J Plasticity 45:3–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vladimirov IN, Pietryga MP, Reese S (2009) Prediction of springback in sheet forming by a new finite strain model with nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening. J Mater Process Technol 209(8):4062–4075. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zong YY, Liu P, Guo B, Shan DB (2015) Springback evaluation in hot v-bending of Ti-6Al-4V alloy sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(1-4):577–585. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6190-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li KP, Carden WP, Wagoner RH (2002) Simulation of springback. Int J Mech Sci 44(1):103–122. doi:10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Meinders T, Burchitz IA, Bonte MHA, Lingbeek RA (2008) Numerical product design: springback prediction, compensation and optimization. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48(5):499–514. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chongthairungruang B, Uthaisangsuk V, Suranuntchai S, Jirathearanat S (2013) Springback prediction in sheet metal forming of high strength steels. Mater Design 50:253–266. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng HS, Cao J, Xia ZC (2007) An accelerated springback compensation method. Int J Mech Sci 49(3):267–279. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosochowski A (2001) Die compensation procedure to negate die deflection and component springback. J Mater Process Technol 115(2):187–191. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00805-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo CC, Lin BT (2012) Optimization of springback for AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets in the L-bending process based on the Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1-4):161–173. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3373-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Panthi SK, Ramakrishnan N, Pathak KK, Chouhan JS (2007) An analysis of springback in sheet metal bending using finite element method (FEM). J Mater Process Technol 186(1-3):120–124. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng XQ, Shi SQ, Hu KK (2013) Comparison of material models for spring back prediction in an automotive panel using finite element method. J Mater Eng Perform 22(10):2990–2996. doi:10.1007/s11665-013-0600-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gan W, Wagoner RH (2004) Die design method for sheet springback. Int J Mech Sci 46(7):1097–1113. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McAtee S, Dunn M, Nagarajah R (2014) Simulation scan comparison for process monitoring using 3D scanning in manufacturing environments. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 74(5-8):823–834. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6037-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Zhou, J., Zhao, T. et al. Springback compensation of automotive panel based on three-dimensional scanning and reverse engineering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 1187–1193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8042-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8042-x

Keywords

Navigation