Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainability assessment of products based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable product design is one of the key challenges for manufacturers to achieve sustainability, whereas it is not clear what products mean sustainability due to subjectivity of concept. This paper proposes a novel assessment methodology for evaluating product sustainability performance based on quantitative and qualitative information. Product sustainability performance index (PSPI) is defined to assist designers and engineers to evaluate and compare the relative sustainability performance of different product. An evaluation model is established based on six dimension sustainability elements (Environment, Economy, Society, Functionality, Manufacturability, and Reusability) in order to provide a new comprehensive sustainability assessment framework in a closed-loop life cycle system. Furthermore, the multi-level hierarchical structure based on criteria and corresponding sub-criteria is utilized in order to conduct more effective analysis. The improved fuzzy multi-criteria decision method is employed incorporating subjective judgment and objective information to determine weights of criteria and related sub-criteria in real decision-making situation. The positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions are employed to satisfy the designers’ desire to be as close as possible from the positive-ideal solutions. Sustainability performances of different manufactured products are assessed by integrating different levels sub-criteria into criteria. Illustrative example involving Bridgeport manual mill and Mori Seiki DuraVertical 5060 in three use environments is discussed to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howarth G, Hadfield M (2006) A sustainable product design model. Mater Des 27(10):1128–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eco-indicator (1999) http://www.pre-sustainabilitycom/reports

  3. Le Bourhis F, Kerbrat O, Hascoët JY, Mognol P (2013) Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):1927–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan J, Feng C, Li L (2014) Sustainability assessment of machining process based on extension theory and entropy weight approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5–8):1419–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bork CAS, de Souza JF, de Oliveira Gomes J, Canhete VVP, De Barba Jr DJ (2014) Methodological tools for assessing the sustainability index (SI) of industrial production processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–13

  6. Kim DB, Shin SJ, Shao G, Brodsky A (2014) A decision-guidance framework for sustainability performance analysis of manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(9–12):1455–1471

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2–3):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarkar P, Rachuri S, Suh HW, Lyons K, Sriram RD (2009) A measure of product sustainability based on triple bottom line. ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference(IDETC), August 30-September 2, 267–274

  9. Jawahir IS, Wanigarathne PC, Wang X (2006) Product design and manufacturing processes for sustainability. Chapter 12 mechanical engineers’ handbook 414–443

  10. Chang CW, Wu CR, Lin CT, Chen HC (2007) An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Comput Ind Eng 52(2):296–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taha Z, Rostam S (2012) A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. J Intell Manuf 23(6):2137–2149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayağ Z, Özdemir RG (2012) Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP. Int J Prod Econ 140(2):630–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dursun M, Karsak EE, Karadayi MA (2011) Assessment of health-care waste treatment alternatives using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches. Resour Conserv Recycl 57:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang SN, Chen C, Chen Y, Lee HS, Shen PD (2013) Sustainable design performance evaluation with applications in the automobile industry: focusing on inefficiency by undesirable factors. Omega 41(3):553–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C, Zhu J, Yu JY, Noori H (2012) A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 221(2):348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inoue M, Lindow K, Stark R, Tanaka K, Nahm YE, Ishikawa H (2012) Decision-making support for sustainable product creation. Adv Eng Inform 26(4):782–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghadimi P, Azadnia AH, Yusof NM, Saman MZM (2012) A weighted fuzzy approach for product sustainability assessment: a case study in automotive industry. J Clean Prod 33:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta A, Vangari R, Jayal AD, Jawahir IS (2011) Priority evaluation of product metrics for sustainable manufacturing. Global product development. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 631–641

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jawahir IS, Wanigarathne PC (2004) New challenges in developing science-based sustainability principles for next generation product design and manufacture (Keynote Paper). Proceedings of TMT, Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1–10

  20. Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JH (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(9):2263–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Diaz N, Helu M, Jayanathan S, Chen Y, Horvath A, Dornfeld D (2010) Environmental analysis of milling machine tool use in various manufacturing environments. IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST) 1–6

  22. Avram O, Stroud I, Xirouchakis P (2011) A multi-criteria decision method for sustainability assessment of the use phase of machine tool systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5–8):811–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayağ Z, Ozdemir RG (2011) An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process. J Intell Manuf 22(2):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mori Seiki Co. Ltd. 2006 http://www.moriseiki.com/english/news/pdf/2006_0622_Dura.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2015

  25. Bridgeport milling machine factory manual. http://www.truetex.com/bridgeport-manual.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunhua Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, C., Mai, Y. Sustainability assessment of products based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 695–710 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7978-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7978-1

Keywords

Navigation