Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study on the estimation of plastic deformation of metal insert parts in multi-cavity injection molding by injection-structural coupled analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insert parts in insert injection molding used to be deformed by pressure developed during the molding process. The plastic deformation of insert parts caused by injection pressure during insert injection molding for electric power plugs cannot be predicted by conventional injection molding analysis methods. In this study, the injection-structural coupled analysis was carried out to predict the plastic deformation of insert parts. Injection pressure developed during the molding process was calculated by the injection molding analysis software and was mapped onto the grid surface of the inner tube model for structural analysis as boundary conditions. The effect of process parameters such as injection time, melt temperature, and holding pressure on the injection pressure and the deformation of the inner tubes was examined to find the proper molding condition. The result from the analysis was compared to the insert injection molding experiment. Furthermore, the diameters of sub-runners in the multi-cavity mold of the power plugs were optimized to prevent the deformation of the inner tubes by the unbalanced filling of the melt into the linear arranged cavities using the injection-structural coupled analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menges G, Michaeli W, Mohren P (2000) How to make injection molds. HANSER, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakharev A, Fan Z, Costa F, Jin X, Kennedy P (2004) Prediction of core shift effects using mold filling simulation. Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2004, pp 621–625

  3. Chou Y, Yang W, Giacomin AJ, Hade AJ (2008) 3D numerical simulation investigating the effect of volumetric flow rate on core deflection. Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2008, pp. 390–394

  4. Wu C, Huang Y (2007) The influence of cavity deformation on the shrinkage and warpage of an injection-molded part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1144–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim W, Gang MG, Min B, Kim W (2014) Experimental and numerical investigations of cavity filling process in injection moulding for microcantilever structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6104-0

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn D, Kim D, Yoon Y (2010) Optimal injection molding conditions considering the core shift for a plastic battery case with thin and deep walls. J Mech Sci Technol 24:125–148

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo ZZ, Li Y, Zhao XJ (2011) The analysis of core shift in injection mold and its optimization based on AMI. Adv Mater Res 189–193:2879–2883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ling D, Gupta M (2005) Prediction of core deflection in ceramic injection molding. Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2005, pp 42–46

  9. Hwang CJ, Ko YB, Park HP, Chung ST, Rhee BO (2007) Computer aided engineering design of powder injection molding process for a dental scaler tip mold design. Mater Sci Forum 534–536:341–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Liao Y, Tseng S, Giacomin AJ (2011) Core deflection in plastics injection molding: direct measurement, flow visualization and 3D simulation. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 50:863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giacomin AJ, Hade A, Johnson L, Mix A, Chen Y, Lio H, Tseng S (2011) Core deflection in injection molding. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 166:908–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engelstein GA (2004) Coupled filling-structural simulation on a water manifold injection mold. Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2004, pp 511–514

  13. Taguchi G (1990) Introduction to quality engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tzeng C, Yang Y, Hsieh M, Chen C (2011) Adaptive adjustment of injection molding process for mechanical characteristics using the Taguchi method and response surface methodology. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 50:552–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chuang M, Yang Y, Hsiao Y (2009) Modeling and optimization of injection molding process parameters for thin-shell plastic parts. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 48:745–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alam K, Kamal MR (2003) A genetic optimization of shrinkage by runner balancing. Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2003, pp 637–641

  17. Lam YC, Seow LW (2000) Cavity balance for plastic injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 40:1273–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boell K, Beaumont J, Young B (2003) Artificially balancing geometrically balanced runner systems. Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2003, pp 430-434.

  19. Beaumont J (2008) Runner and gating design handbook: tools for successful injection molding. Hanser, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy P (1995) Flow analysis of injection molds. Hanser, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyungpil Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, H., Cha, B., Cho, S. et al. A study on the estimation of plastic deformation of metal insert parts in multi-cavity injection molding by injection-structural coupled analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83, 2057–2069 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7694-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7694-x

Keywords

Navigation