Skip to main content
Log in

Production and uncertain green subcontracting control for an unreliable manufacturing system facing emissions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faced with environmental legislation imposed by authorities, manufacturers must review their short- and mid-long-term strategies in order to integrate the environmental dimension into the decision-making process. In that context, in this paper, we address the problem of an unreliable manufacturing system producing one product family type to meet a demand. We consider that the manufacturing system’s operations generate harmful emissions into the environment. Hence, in addition to inventory, production and backlog costs, an environmental penalty is imposed when the emission level reaches a specific limit (cap approach). Because technology investments in production clean processes is often heavy and to improve its environmental strategy, we consider that demand can be partially satisfied by an unreliable subcontractor. The subcontractor which is characterized by a high development and innovation on sustainable technology requires a high selling cost and a random availability. This work examines this decision-making problem in order to propose a new joint production and subcontracting control policy which takes into account the emission level. The objective is to optimize the total cost, which includes the inventory, backlog, production, emission, and subcontracting costs, over an infinite horizon. An experimental approach combining simulation, experimental design and response surface methodology is used to solve the problem. Through numerical examples and further sensitivity analysis, the structure of the control policy is confirmed and analyzed. Thanks to the practical usefulness of the resolution approach, we provide a decision support system to help managers in deciding whether or not to subcontract, depending on green subcontractor characteristics (availability and cost).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abernathy FH, Dunlop JT, Hammond JH, Weil D (2000) Control your inventory in a world of lean retailing. Harv Bus Rev 78(6):169–176

    Google Scholar 

  2. Assid M, Gharbi A, Hajji A (2014) Joint production and setup control policies of unreliable manufacturing systems minimizing the incurred total cost and taking into account other criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:809–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baas L (2007) To make zero emissions technologies and strategies become a reality, the lessons learned of cleaner production dissemination have to be known. J Clean Prod 15(13):1205–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Salem A, Gharbi A, Hajji A (2015) Environmental issue in an alternative production—maintenance control for unreliable manufacturing system subject to degradation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Salem A, Gharbi A, Hajji A (2015) An environmental hedging point policy to control production rate and emissions in unreliable manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 53(2):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley JR (2004) A Brownian approximation of a production-inventory system with a manufacturer that subcontracts. Oper Res 52(5):765–784

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown D (2008) It is good to be green: environmentally friendly credentials are influencing business outsourcing decisions. Strateg Outsourcing: Int J 1(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cebon P (1993) Corporate obstacles to pollution prevention. EPA J 19:20

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C, Monahan GE (2010) Environmental safety stock: the impacts of regulatory and voluntary control policies on production planning, inventory control, and environmental performance. Eur J Oper Res 207:1280–1292

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen X, Benjaafar S, Elomri A (2013) The carbon-constrained EOQ. Oper Res Lett 41(2):172–179

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahane M, Dellagi S, Clémentz C, Rezg N (2011) Development of joint maintenance and production strategies in a subcontracting environment. Int J Prod Res 49(23):6937–6961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Drake D, Kleindorfer PR, Van Wassenhove LN (2012) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Harvard Business School Working Paper, Harvard University

  13. Hajej Z, Dellagi S, Rezg N (2014) Joint optimisation of maintenance and production policies with subcontracting and product returns. J Intell Manuf 25(3):589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hajji A, Gharbi A, Kenne J-P (2009) Joint replenishment and manufacturing activities control in a two-stage unreliable supply chain. Int J Prod Res 47(12):3231–3251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenne J-P, Gharbi A (2000) Production planning problem in manufacturing systems with general failure and repair time distributions. Prod Plan Control 11(6):581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kouedeu AF, Kenné JP, Dejax P, Songmene V, Polotski V (2014) Production and maintenance planning for a failure-prone deteriorating manufacturing system: a hierarchical control approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol :1–13

  17. Kumar RS, Subrahmanya MB (2010) Influence of subcontracting on innovation and economic performance of SMEs in Indian automobile industry. Technovation 30(11):558–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lambert DM, Emmelhainz MA, Gardner JT (1996) Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships. Int J Logist Manag 7(2):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li S (2014) Optimal control of production-maintenance system with deteriorating items emission tax and pollution R&D investment. Int J Prod Res 52(6):1787–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramudhin A, Chaabane A, Kharoune M, Paquet M (2008) Carbon market sensitive green supply chain network design. In: Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEM 2008. IEEE International Conference, IEEE, p 1093–1097

  21. Rivera-Gomez H, Gharbi A, Kenné JP (2013) Joint control of production, overhaul, and preventive maintenance for a production system subject to quality and reliability deteriorations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):2111–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sivakumar R, Kannan D, Murugesan P (2014) Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry. Resour Policy. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.03.008 (In Press)

  23. Tan B (2004) Subcontracting with availability guarantees: production control and capacity decisions. IIE Trans 36(8):711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang J, Qi X, Xia Y (2005) A production-inventory system with Markovian capacity and outsourcing option. Oper Res 53(2):328–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Gharbi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben-Salem, A., Gharbi, A. & Hajji, A. Production and uncertain green subcontracting control for an unreliable manufacturing system facing emissions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83, 1787–1799 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7677-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7677-y

Keywords

Navigation