Skip to main content
Log in

A new fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making method with an application to the critical path selection

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making method and apply it to determine the critical path in a project network. The criteria used here are time (expected duration), cost, risk, and quality of the project activities that are considered critical in project management. As each criterion has its independent level of importance in the critical path selection, the weights of the project criteria are also considered in the analysis. Considering that the information in terms of various project activities and criteria weights are often incomplete and/or uncertain in real-world situations, the essential information in terms of the criteria and project activities are obtained using triangular fuzzy numbers and/or linguistic variables that are mapped to triangular fuzzy numbers, wherever appropriate. The proposed method involves fuzzy evaluation based on the fuzzy information of the possible project paths on each criterion leading to the strength and weakness index scores of the project paths. We define a measure of criticality termed as the total performance score of each project path obtained using its strength and weakness index scores. The path that has the highest measure of criticality is selected as the critical path. A numerical illustration is provided to demonstrate working of the proposed methodology. Further, a case study from manufacturing engineering industry is also presented to better justify the applicability and potentials of the proposed methodology. A comparison with closely related fuzzy multi-criteria decision methods for the critical path selection is done to analyze the performance of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amiri M, Golozari F (2011) Application of fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in determining the critical path by using time, cost, risk, and quality criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arabzad SM, Ghorbani M, Razmi J, Shirouyehzad H (2015) Employing fuzzy TOPSIS and SWOT for supplier selection and order allocation problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:803–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CT, Lin CT, Huang SF (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 102:289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen SP (2007) Analysis of critical paths in a project network with fuzzy activity times. Eur J Oper Res 183:442–459

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen CT, Huang SF (2007) Applying fuzzy method for measuring criticality in project network. Inf Sci 177:2448–2458

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen SP, Hsueh YJ (2008) A simple approach to fuzzy critical path analysis in project networks. Appl Math Model 32:1289–1297

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cristobal JRS (2013) Critical path definition using multicriteria decision making: PROMETHEE method. J Manag Eng 29:158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L (1998) Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making. J Inf Sci 107:177–194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebrahimnejad S, Hosseinpour MH, Nasrabadi AM (2013) A fuzzy bi-objective mathematical model for optimum portfolio selection by considering inflation rate effects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:595–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elizabeth S, Sujatha L (2013) Fuzzy critical path problem for project network. Int J Pure Appl Math 85:223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Flouris T, Lock D (2008) Aviation project management. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:67–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassanzadeh F, Collan M, Modarres M (2012) A practical R&D selection model using fuzzy pay-off method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassanzadeh F, Nemati H, Sun M (2014) Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection. Eur J Oper Res 238:41–53

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaur P, Kumar A (2014) Linear programming approach for solving fuzzy critical path problems with fuzzy parameters. Appl Soft Comput 21:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee HS (2005) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of distribution center. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3612:1290–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Nie X, Chen S (2007) Fuzzy approach to prequalifying construction contractors. J Construct Eng Manag 133:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin FT, Yao JS (2003) Fuzzy critical path method based on signed-distance ranking and statistical confidence-interval estimates. J Supercomput 24:305–325

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin CT, Ying TC (2004) Bid no bid decision making, a fuzzy linguistic approach. Int J Proj Manag 22:585–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Madhuri KU, Siresha S, Shankar NR (2012) A new approach for solving fuzzy critical path problem using L-L fuzzy numbers. Appl Math Sci 6:1303–1324

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahdi I, Alreshaid K (2005) Decision support system for select the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Proj Manag 23:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moghimi R, Anvari A (2014) An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach and analysis to evaluate the financial performance of Iranian cement companies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:685–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pour NS, Zeynali S, Kheradmand MP (2012) Calculating the fuzzy project network critical path. Int J Eng Tech 1:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shankar NR, Saradhi BP, Babu SS (2013) Fuzzy critical path method based on a new approach of ranking fuzzy numbers using centroid of centroids. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl 3:16–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylan O, Bafail AO, Abdulaal RMS, Kabli MR (2014) Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput 17:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vahdani B, Mousavi SM, Hashemi H, Mousakhani M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013) A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26:779–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan Y (1991) Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods. Fuzzy Sets Syst 43:139–157

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zammori FA, Braglia M, Frosolini M (2009) A fuzzy multicriteria approach for critical path definition. Int J Proj Manag 27:278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zareei A, Zaerpour F, Bagherpour M, Noora AA, Vencheh AH (2011) A new approach for solving fuzzy critical path problem using analysis of events. Expert Syst Appl 38:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zielinski P (2005) On computing the latest starting times and floats of activities in a network with imprecise durations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 150:53–76

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehlawat, M.K., Gupta, P. A new fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making method with an application to the critical path selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83, 1281–1296 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7610-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7610-4

Keywords

Navigation