Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic method for the automatic update and propagation of the machining process models in the process modification

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamically changing the machining condition and uncertain manufacturing resource availability are forcing the computer-aided process planning system to enhance the modification function of 3D process model. During the process planning, the process modification is an inevitable process activity for a new machined part. For updating the changed process models accurately and timely, this paper proposes a systematic method for the automatic update and propagation after modifying the process. Firstly, the process model is analyzed and decomposed into two parts: the process model information and the process attribute information. Secondly, based on the precedence relations of the process models in machining, the relationships among them are divided into two types: the dependency relation and the independency relation. Then, in order to ensure the validity of the changed process models, the determination method of the relationship among process models is proposed. Finally, the automatic update and propagation method of the process models is proposed by considering the relationships among them. The proposed method is verified by application of two examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou X, Qiu Y, Hua G, Wang H, Ruan X (2007) A feasible approach to the integration of CAD and CAPP. Comput Aided Des 39(4):324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wan N, Mo R, Liu LL, Li J (2014) New methods of creating MBD process model: On the basis of machining knowledge. Comput Ind 65(4):537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li JX, Chen ZN, Yan XG (2014) Automatic generation of in-process models based on feature working step and feature cutter volume. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1-4):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang S, Shi Y, Fan H, Huang R, Cao J (2010) Serial 3D model reconstruction for machining evolution of rotational parts by merging semantic and graphic process planning information. Comput Aided Des 42(9):781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuh JYH, Chang CH, Melkanoff MA (1996) The development of an integrated and intelligent CAD/CAPP/CAFP environment using logic-based reasoning. Comput Aided Des 28(3):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salehi V, McMahon C (2009) Action research into the use of parametric associative CAD systems in an industrial context, International Conference on Engineering Design 2009, 24-27 August 2009, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,USA. Glasgow, Design Methods and Tools:133-144

  7. Kim BC, Mun D, Han S, Pratt MJ (2011) A method to exchange procedurally represented 2D CAD model data using ISO 10303 STEP. Comput Aided Des 43(12):1717–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim J, Pratt MJ, Iyer RG, Sriram RD (2008) Standardized data exchange of CAD models with design intent. Comput Aided Des 40(7):760–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li M, Langbein FC, Martin RR (2010) Detecting design intent in approximate CAD models using symmetry. Comput Aided Des 42(3):183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva J, Chang KH (2002) Design parameterization for concurrent design and manufacturing of mechanical systems. Concurrent Eng Res Appl 10(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen MA, Eliashberg J, Ho TH (1996) New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Manage Sci 42(2):173–186

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang J, Han S (2006) Repairing CAD model errors based on the design history. Comput Aided Des 38(6):627–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang QH, Li JR, Wu BL, Zhang XM (2010) Live parametric design modifications in CAD-linked virtual environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(9-12):859–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. You CF, Chao SN (2009) Propagation of design change between different CAD by using duplicate design procedures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(3-4):330–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mervyn F, Kumar AS, Bok SH, Nee AYC (2004) Developing distributed applications for integrated product and process design. Comput Aided Des 36(8):679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gharib I, Qin SF (2013) Integration of sketch-based conceptual design and commercial CAD systems for manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9-12):2669–2681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu HM, Li DB (2009) Modeling of process parameter selection with mathematical logic for process planning. Robot Cim-imt Manuf 25(3):529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu C, Li Y, Shen W (2014) Dynamic feature modelling for closed-loop machining process control of complex parts. Int J Comput Integ M 1-13

  19. Wang H, Xu X, TEDFORD J (2006) An adaptable CNC system based on STEP-NC and function blocks. Int J Prod Res 45(17):3809–3829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiwari M, Kotaiah KR, Bhatnagar S (2001) A case-based computer-aided process-planning system for machining prismatic components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(6):400–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nassehi A, Liu R, Newman ST (2007) A new software platform to support feature-based process planning for interoperable STEP-NC manufacture. Int J Comput Integ M 20(7):669–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YS, Wang E (2002) Recognition of machining features for cast then machined parts. Comput Aided Des 34(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghatrehnaby M, Arezoo B (2012) Automatic strip layout design in progressive dies. J Intell Manuf 23(3):661–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, Liu X, Cheng Y, Ni Z (2015) An algorithm of mapping the protrusion feature on the slanting face to its manufacturing feature volume in the process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1-16

  25. Wan N, Gou Y, Liu L (2013) Active change propagation and consistency maintenance for MBD machining process model. Jisuanji Fuzhu Sheji Yu Tuxingxue Xuebao/J Comput-Aided Des Comput Graphics 25(6):924–930 [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yilmaz O, Gindy N, Gao J (2010) A repair and overhaul methodology for aeroengine components. Robot Cim-imt Manuf 26(2):190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojun Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Liu, X., Cheng, Y. et al. A systematic method for the automatic update and propagation of the machining process models in the process modification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 473–487 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7371-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7371-0

Keywords

Navigation