Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Six Sigma through Poka-Yoke: a navigation through literature arena

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the middle of 1980s, Six Sigma concept emerged in Motorola. Because Six Sigma implementation facilitated the companies to achieve profitability, it was implemented subsequently in many parts of the world. Six Sigma is implemented by majority of the companies situated in the world by applying DMAIC (stands for define, measure, analyse, improve and control) phases. Meanwhile, there have been reports of the failures of implementing Six Sigma programmes presumably due to the failure to consider and apply the appropriate tools and techniques. In this regard, it is to be noticed that Poka-Yoke, which is a tool that can be used to achieve zero-defect manufacturing, has the potential to support the implementation of DMAIC phases of Six Sigma. On deriving this observation, the literature navigation reported in this paper was carried out to understand the essence of Six Sigma and Poka-Yoke as well as the trend of applying Poka-Yoke in DMAIC phases. In the literature survey conducted to carry out this literature navigation, the researches on applying Poka-Yoke concept in DMAIC phases were studied by referring to the relevant research papers. It has been pointed out that the Poka-Yoke solutions suggested in these research papers were not actually implemented in real-time scenario. Hence, this article ends with a suggestion that future researchers can make efforts to actually implement Poka-Yoke technique in DMAIC phases for achieving the goals of Six Sigma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aboelmaged MG (2010) Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 27(3):268–317. doi:10.1108/02656711011023294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ismyrlis V, Moschidis O (2013) Six Sigma’s critical success factors and toolbox. Int J Lean Six Sigma 4(2):108–117. doi:10.1108/20401461311319310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutton C (2014) The evolution of human sigma. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour 15:115–133. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2014.889534

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Prasad AG, Saravanan S, Gijo EV, Dasari SM, Tatachar R, Suratkar P (2013) Six Sigma-based approach to optimise the diffusion process of crystalline silicon solar cell manufacturing. Int J Sustainable Energy. doi:10.1080/14786451.2013.861463

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar UD, Nowicki D, Ramırez-Marquez JE, Verma D (2008) On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111:456–467. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antony J, Bhuller AS, Kumar M, Mendibil K, Montgomery DC (2012) Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in a transactional environment. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 29(1):31–53. doi:10.1108/02656711211190864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Banawi A, Bilec MM (2014) A framework to improve construction processes: integrating Lean, Green and Six Sigma. Int J Construct Manag 14(1):58–71. doi:10.1080/15623599.2013.875266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drohomeretski E, da Costa SEG, de Lima EP, da Rosa Garbuio PA (2014) Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy. Int J Prod Res 52(3):804–824. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.842015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwaarden JV, Wiele TVD, Dale B, Williams R, Bertsch B (2008) The Six Sigma improvement approach: a transnational comparison. Int J Prod Res 46(23):6739–6758. doi:10.1080/00207540802234050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, Choo AS (2008) Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory. J Oper Manag 26:536–554. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobs BW, Swink M, Linderman K (2015) Performance effects of early and late Six Sigma adoptions. J Oper Manag:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.01.002

  12. Holmes MC, Jenicke LO, Hempel JL (2015) A framework for Six Sigma project selection in higher educational institutions, using a weighted scorecard approach. Qual Assur Educ 23(1):30–46. doi:10.1108/QAE-04-2014-0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Desai DA, Kotadiya P, Makwana N, Patel S (2015) Curbing variations in packaging process through Six Sigma way in a large-scale food-processing industry. J Ind Eng Int 11(1):119–129. doi:10.1007/s40092-014-0082-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jesus AR, Antony J, Herman, Lepikson HA, Cavalcante CAMT (2015) Key observations from a survey about Six Sigma implementation in Brazil. Int J Product Perform Manag 64(1):94–111. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saghaei A, Najafi H, Mighi A, Mosanna Z (2014) Mathematical modelling to improve rolled throughput yield in a supply chain. Prod Plan Control 25(5):414–424. doi:10.1080/09537287.2012.702865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krueger D, Parast MM, Adams S (2013) Six Sigma implementation: a qualitative case study using grounded theory. Prod Plan Control. doi:10.1080/09537287.2013.771414

    Google Scholar 

  17. Antony J (2004) Six Sigma in the UK service organisations: results from a pilot survey. Manag Audit J 19(8):1006–1013. doi:10.1108/02686900410557908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas AJ, Mason-Jones R, Davies A, John EG (2015) Reducing turn-round variability through the application of Six Sigma in aerospace MRO facilities. J Manuf Technol Manag 26(3):314–332. doi:10.1108/JMTM-05-2013-0052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karthi S, Devadasan SR, Murugesh R, Sreenivasa CG, Sivaram NM (2012) Global views on integrating Six Sigma and ISO 9001 certification. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 23(3):237–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mosadeghrad AM (2014) Why TQM programmes fail ? A pathology approach. TQM J 26(2):160–187. doi:10.1108/TQM-12-2010-0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jirasukprasert P, Garza-reyes JA, Kumar V, Lim MK (2014) A Six Sigma and DMAIC application for the reduction of defects in a rubber gloves manufacturing process. Int J Lean Six Sigma 5(1):2–21. doi:10.1108/IJLSS-03-2013-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heckl D, Moormann J, Rosemann M (2010) Uptake and success factors of Six Sigma in the financial services industry. Bus Process Manag J 16(3):436–472. doi:10.1108/14637151011049449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gijo EV, Scaria J (2014) Process improvement through Six Sigma with Beta correction: a case study of manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:717–730. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5483-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gijo EV, Bhat S, Jnanesh NA (2014) Application of Six Sigma methodology in a small-scale foundry industry. Int J Lean Six Sigma 5(2):193–211. doi:10.1108/IJLSS-09-2013-0052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miguel PAC, de Carvalho MM (2014) Benchmarking Six Sigma implementation in services companies operating in an emerging economy. Benchmarking Int J 21(1):62–76. doi:10.1108/BIJ-03-2012-0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bilgen B, Sen M (2012) Project selection through fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and a case study on Six Sigma implementation in an automotive industry. Prod Plan Control 23(1):2–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang FK, Chen KS (2014) Evaluating management consultants for Six Sigma projects. Arab J Sci Eng 39(3):2371–2379. doi:10.1007/s13369-013-0785-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eom SJ, Jang W-S, Kim S-c (2015) Managing concrete crack information through correction of the slab rebar arrangement based on Six Sigma. KSCE J Civ Eng:1-9. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0278-3

  29. de Mast J, Lokkerbol J (2012) An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. Int J Prod Econ 139(2):604–614. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Swink M, Jacobs BW (2012) Six Sigma adoption: operating performance impacts and contextual drivers of success. J Oper Manag 30(6):437–453. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumaravadivel A, Natarajan U (2013) Application of Six-Sigma DMAIC methodology to sand-casting process with response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1403-1420. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5119-2

  32. Cronemyr P, Eriksson M, Jakolini S (2014) Six Sigma diplomacy—the impact of Six Sigma on national patterns of corporate culture. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.906108

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grima P, Marco-almagro L, Santiago S, Tort-Martorell X (2014) Six Sigma: hints from practice to overcome difficulties. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 25(3):198–208. doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.825101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Steiner SH, Mackay RJ (2014) Statistical engineering and variation reduction. Qual Eng 26:44–60. doi:10.1080/08982112.2013.846069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar S, Sosnoski M (2009) Using DMAIC Six Sigma to systematically improve shopfloor production quality and costs. Int J Product Perform Manag 58(3):254–273. doi:10.1108/17410400910938850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaushik P, Khanduja D, Mittal K, Jaglan P (2012) A case study application of Six Sigma methodology in a small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprise. TQM J 24(1):4–16. doi:10.1108/17542731211191186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gijo EV, Scaria J (2010) Reducing rejection and rework by application of Six Sigma methodology in manufacturing process. Int J Six Sigma Competitive Adv 6(1/2):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nepal B, Mohanty S, Kay L (2013) Quality improvement of medical wire manufacturing process. Qual Eng 25:151–163. doi:10.1080/08982112.2012.758282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hwang YD (2006) The practices of integrating manufacturing execution systems and Six Sigma methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:145-154. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0164-0

  40. Bunce MM, Wang L, Bidanda B (2008) Leveraging Six Sigma with industrial engineering tools in crateless retort production. Int J Prod Res 46(23):6701–6719. doi:10.1080/00207540802230520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kumar S, Steinebach M (2008) Eliminating US hospital medical errors. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 21(5):444–471. doi:10.1108/09526860810890431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin C, Chen FF, H-d W, Chen YM, Kuriger G (2013) Continuous improvement of knowledge management systems using Six Sigma methodology. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(3):95–103. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2012.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shahin A, Jaberi R (2011) Designing an integrative model of leagile production and analyzing its influence on the quality of auto parts based on Six Sigma approach with a case study in a manufacturing company. Int J Lean Six Sigma 2(3):215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ghosh S, Maiti J (2012) Data mining driven DMAIC framework for improving foundry quality—a case study. Prod Plan Control. doi:10.1080/09537287.2012.709642

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chuang SP (2012) Assessing and improving the green performance using a compound approach. Flex Serv Manuf J. doi:10.1007/s10696-012-9156-1

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee J, Yuvamitra K, Guiberteau K, Kozman TA (2014) Six-Sigma approach to energy management planning. Strateg Plan Energy Environ 33 (3). doi:10.1080/10485236.2014.10781519

  47. He Z, Zhang X-T, Zhang M (2014) Reducing the voluntary turnover rate of dispatched employees by the DMAIC process. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.904573

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar S, Hudson B, Lowry J (2010) Consumer purchase process improvements in e-tailing operations—a case study. Int J Product Perform Manag 59(4):388–403. doi:10.1108/17410401011038928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kumar S, Wolfe AD, Wolfe KA (2008) Using Six Sigma DMAIC to improve credit initiation process in a financial services operation. Int J Product Perform Manag 57(8):659–676. doi:10.1108/17410400810916071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Southard PB, Chandra C, Kumar S (2012) RFID in healthcare: a Six Sigma DMAIC and simulation case study. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 25(4):291–321. doi:10.1108/09526861211221491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Black K, Revere L (2006) Six Sigma arises from the ashes of TQM with a twist. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 19(3):259–266. doi:10.1108/09526860610661473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Saurin TA, Ribeiro JLD, Vidor G (2012) A framework for assessing Poka-Yoke devices. J Manuf Syst 31(3):358–366. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fisher M (1999) Process improvement by Poka-Yoke. Work Stud 48(7):264–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. de Bucourt M, Busse R, Guttler F, Wintzer C, Collettini F, Kloeters C, Hamm B, Teichgräber UK (2011) Lean manufacturing and Toyota Production System terminology applied to the procurement of vascular stents in interventional radiology. Insights Imaging 2:415–423. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0097-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Conti R, Angelis J, Cooper C, Faragher B, Gill C (2006) The effects of lean production on worker job stress. Int J Oper Product Manag 26(9):1013–1038. doi:10.1108/01443570610682616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Al-Tahat MD, Jalham IS (2013) A structural equation model and a statistical investigation of lean-based quality and productivity improvement. J Intell Manuf. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0816-0

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wasim A, Shehab E, Abdalla H, Al-Ashaab A, Sulowski R, Alam R (2013) An innovative cost modelling system to support lean product and process development. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:165–181. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4158-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hedelind M, Jackson M (2011) How to improve the use of industrial robots in lean manufacturing systems. J Manuf Technol Manag 22(7):891–905. doi:10.1108/17410381111160951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Amin SS, Atre R (2013) Indigenous development amongst challenges Munjal Showa Limited and the implementation of total productive maintenance. Int J Product Perform Manag 62(3):323–338. doi:10.1108/17410401311309212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Matt DT (2008) Template based production system design. J Manuf Technol Manag 19(7):783–797. doi:10.1108/17410380810898741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang JZ (2014) Development of an in-process Pokayoke system utilizing accelerometer and logistic regression modeling for monitoring injection molding flash. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5604-7

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gitlow H, Zuo QA, Ullmann SG, Zambrana D, Campo RE, Lubarsky D, Birnbach DJ (2013) The causes of never events in hospitals. Int J Lean Six Sigma 4(3):338–344. doi:10.1108/IJLSS-03-2013-0016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wadhwa RS (2012) Flexibility in manufacturing automation: a living lab case study of Norwegian metalcasting SMEs. J Manuf Syst 31(4):444–454. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Chase RB, Apte UM (2007) A history of research in service operations: what’s the big idea ? J Oper Manag 25:375–386. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kattman B, Corbin TP, Moore LE, Walsh L (2012) Visual workplace practices positively impact business processes. Benchmarking Int J 19(3):412–430. doi:10.1108/14635771211243021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Myszewski JM (2012) Management responsibility for human errors. TQM J 24(4):326–337. doi:10.1108/17542731211247355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Veronneau S, Roy J (2009) RFID benefits, costs, and possibilities: the economical analysis of RFID deployment in a cruise corporation global service supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 122:692–702. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Fast-berglund A, Fässberg T, Hellman F, Davidsson A, Stahre J (2013) Relations between complexity, quality and cognitive automation in mixed-model assembly. J Manuf Syst 32(3):449–455. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    M. Vinod, S. R. Devadasan, D. T. Sunil & V. M. M. Thilak

Authors
  1. M. Vinod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. R. Devadasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. T. Sunil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. M. M. Thilak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Vinod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinod, M., Devadasan, S.R., Sunil, D.T. et al. Six Sigma through Poka-Yoke: a navigation through literature arena. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81, 315–327 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7217-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7217-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation