Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The quality control method for remanufacturing assembly based on the Jacobian-torsor model

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the assembly accuracy of remanufactured parts with multiple heterogeneity and properties, and to guarantee the quality of remanufacturing product no worse than the original one, this paper takes the air tightness of remanufactured engines’ cylinder block and head as the research target and proposes a quality control method based on the Jacobian-torsor model for remanufacturing assembly. First of all, three different Jacobian-torsor models for assembly tolerance are structured, and according to that, the defined torsor difference (FR) of remanufacturing products is calculated by considering the geometric error of remanufactured related parts assembly influenced by the temperature field and force field. Then, the optimal tightening torque of cylinder heads’ main bolts corresponding to FR is achieved by applying the bivariate Lagrange interpolation method. Finally, taking the assembly of remanufactured engines’ cylinder block and head as a case study to verify the proposed methods is feasible and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu B (2010) State of the art and future development in remanufacturing engineering. Trans Mater Heat Treat 1:003

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu M, Liu C, Xing L, Mei F, Zhang X (2013) Study on a tolerance grading allocation method under uncertainty and quality oriented for remanufactured parts. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1–8.

  3. Sun X, Li Y, Govindan K (2013) Integrating dynamic acquisition pricing and remanufacturing decisions under random price-sensitive returns. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1–4):933–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson M, Guide VD, Koca E, Souza G (2009) The value of quality grading in remanufacturing. Prod Oper Manag 18(3):300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou J, Huang P, Zhu Y, Deng J (2012) A quality evaluation model of reuse parts and its management system development for end-of-life wheel loaders. J Clean Prod 35(17):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niu T (2011) Optimal model for remanufacturing tolerance design and its application. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 17(2):232–238

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X, Liang G, Ma S (2007) Continuous quality improvement for remanufacturing products based on PMLC. China Mech Eng 18(2):170–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang X, Mao H, Li X (2011) Effect of quality uncertainty of parts on performance of reprocessing system in remanufacturing environment. J Southeast Univ 27(1):92–95

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ge M, Liu C, Liu M (2014) The online quality control methods for the assembling of remanufactured engines’ cylinder block and cover under uncertainty. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1–9.

  10. Jin X, Hu S, Ni J, Xiao G (2013) Assembly strategies for remanufacturing systems with variable quality returns. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10(1):76–85. doi:10.1109/TASE.2012.2217741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu M, Liu C, Xing L, Zhang X, Wang Q, Wang X (2014) Location method for remanufactured complex mechanical products. Chinese J Mech Eng 4.50(8):150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, Yin Y, Yang M (2010) A new selective assembly approach for remanufacturing of mating parts. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2010 40th International Conference on. IEEE, 1–6

  13. Cai X, Lai M, Li X, Li Y, Wu X (2014) Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels. Eur J Oper Res 233(2):374–382

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Su C, Xu A (2014) Buffer allocation for hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system considering quality grading. Int J Prod Res 52(5):1269–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu M, Liu C, Zhu Q (2014) Optional classification for reassembly methods with different precision remanufactured parts. Assem Autom 34(4):3–3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teissandier D, Couetard Y, Gerard A (1999) A computer aided tolerancing model: proportioned assembly clearance volume. Comput Aided Des 31(13):805–817

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Desrochers A, Ghie W, Laperriere L (2003) Application of a unified Jacobian-torsor model for tolerance analysis. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 3(1):2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang W, Chen C, Li P, Li G, Hu J (2011) Tolerance modeling in actual working condition based on Jacobian-Torsor theory. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 17(1):77–83

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao F (2010) The structure and principle of automobile engine. Beijing Institute of Press, 6: 220 ~ 221.

  20. Wang S, Li G, Wang H, Liu J, Xu B (2011) Influence of remelting treatment on rolling contact fatigue performance of NiCrBSi coating. Trans Mat Heat Treat 32(11):135–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Pang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, W., Pang, K., Liu, C. et al. The quality control method for remanufacturing assembly based on the Jacobian-torsor model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81, 253–261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7194-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7194-z

Keywords

Navigation