Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of process parameters on acceleration amplitude in the drilling of cold work tool steels

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of process parameters on acceleration amplitude in the drilling of AISI D2 and AISI D3 cold work tool steels using HSS twist drills of two different lengths. Workpiece hardness, drill length/tool overhang, cutting speed, feed rate, and number of holes drilled were chosen as the process parameters. In the tests made by using the full factorial (FF) design technique, the values of induced machining vibrations occurring on the workpiece during drilling were specified as the acceleration amplitude. Measurement results were evaluated by linear regression analysis, and a second-order equation was developed for the prediction of the acceleration amplitude. The correlation coefficient of the predictive equation at a 95 % confidence level was calculated as R 2 = 0.703. The main and interaction effects of the process parameters on the acceleration amplitude were evaluated, and the percentage contributions of the process parameters to the acceleration amplitude were determined by variance analysis. In addition, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and optical microscope images of the drill wear were taken, and the wear characteristics and acceleration amplitude were correlated. The most effective parameters on acceleration amplitude were determined as the number of holes drilled, workpiece hardness, cutting speed, and feed rate. No significant effect of drill length/tool overhang was observed. With increasing cutting speed, number of holes drilled and the drill length/tool overhang, the acceleration amplitude values increased, although they decreased with increasing workpiece hardness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan Y, Okay Ş, Motorcu AR, Nalbant M (2014) Investigation of the effects of machining parameters on the thrust force and cutting torque in the drilling of AISI D2 and AISI D3 cold work tool steels. Indian J Eng Mater S 21:128–138

    Google Scholar 

  2. Şahin Y (2003) İmal Usulleri. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara

  3. Abuthakeer SS, Mohanram PV, Mohan Kumar G (2011) Prediction and control of cutting tool vibration in CNC lathe with Anova and ANN. I. J Lean Think 2:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Izelu CO, Eze SC, Oreko BU, Edward BA, Garba DK (2013) Response surface methodology in the study of induced machining vibration and work surface roughness in the turning of 41Cr4 alloy steel. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khalili K, Danesh M (2013) Investigation of overhang effect on cutting tool vibration for tool condition monitoring. J Meas Eng 1:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stephenson AD, Agapiou JS (2006) Metal cutting theory and practice. Taylor and Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan Y (2010) Effects of different parameters on cutting force, torque, vibration, surface roughness, tool wear and exit burrs in drilling. Dissertation, Gazi University

  8. Abuthakeer SS, Mohanram PV, Mohankumar G (2011) The effect of spindle vibration on surface roughness of workspiece in dry turning using ANN. I. J Lean Think 2:42–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ay M, Turhan A (2011) Determination and optimization of the effect of cutting parameters and workpiece length on the geometric tolerances and surface roughness in turning operation. Int J Phys Sci 6:1074–1084. doi:10.5897/IJPS11.130

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dilipak H, Yılmaz V (2012) Investigation of vibrations and statistical analysis in milling of AISI 1050 steel with carbide tools. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 27:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vinay BG, Janakinandan N, Suresh BG (2013) The impact of cutting conditions on cutting forces and chatter length for steel and aluminum. Int J Eng Adv Technol 2:919–924

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aleksandrovich RV, Siamak G (2014) The effect of tool construction and cutting parameters on surface roughness and vibration in turning of AISI 1045 steel using Taguchi method. Mod Mech Eng 4:8–18. doi:10.4236/mme.2014.41002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang N, Pai PS, Mosquea S (2010) The effect of built-up edge on the cutting vibrations in machining 2024-T351 aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:63–71. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2394-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanjay C (2007) Drill wear monitoring by vibration signature analysis. J Inst Eng Malaysia 68:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rahim EA, Kamdani K, Sharif S (2008) Performance evaluation of uncoated carbide tool in high speed drilling of Ti6Al4V. J Adv Mech Des Syst 2:522–531. doi:10.1299/jamdsm.2.522

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurt M, Kaynak Y, Bagci E (2008) Evaluation of drilled hole quality in Al 2024 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:1051–1060. doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1049-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Panda SS, Chakraborty D, Pal SK (2008) Flank wear prediction in drilling using back propagation neural network and radial basis function network. Appl Soft Comput 8:858–871. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2007.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramkumar J, Malhotra SK, Krishnamurthy R (2004) Effect of workpiece vibration on drilling of GFRP laminates. J Mater Process Technol 152:329–332. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00622-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang JZ, Chen JC (2009) Surface roughness optimization in a drilling operation using the Taguchi design method. Mater Manuf Process 24:459–467. doi:10.1080/10426910802714399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmadi K, Altintas Y (2013) Stability of lateral, torsional and axial vibrations in drilling. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 68:63–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Messaoud A, Weihs C, Hering F (2008) Detection of chatter vibration in a drilling process using multivariate control charts. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:3208–3219. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.09.029

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Imani BM, Moosavi SG (2009) Time domain simulation of torsional-axial and lateral vibration in drilling operation. Proceeding of International Conference on Applications and Design in Mechanical Engineering (ICADME) 11-13 October, Batu Ferringhi Penang, Malaysia, 1-7

  23. Bayly PV, Metzler SA, Schaut AJ, Young KA (2000) Theory of torsional chatter in twist drills: model, stability analysis and composition to test. J Manuf Sci Eng 123:552–561. doi:10.1115/1.1381399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehrabadi IM, Nouri M, Madoliat R (2009) Investigating chatter vibration in deep drilling, including process damping and the gyroscopic effect. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 49:939–946. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stone E, Askari A (2002) Nonlinear models of chatter in drilling processes. Dyn Syst 17:65–85. doi:10.1080/14689360110105788

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang BW (2003) Dynamic characteristics of a drill in the drilling process. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 217:161–167. doi:10.1243/095440503321148803

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan Y, Nalbant M, Gökkaya H (2011) The experimental investigation of the effect of machining parameters on burr formation in drilling of AISI D2 and AISI D3 cold work steels. Karaelmas Sci Eng J 1:37–46. doi:10.7212%2Fzkufbd.v1i1.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Akman G, Özkan C (2011) Solving adhesion problem in metal sheet manufacturing with design of experiments. Dogus Univ J 12:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  29. Breyfoglef W (2003) Implementing six sigma: smarter solutions using statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lazic´ ZR (2004) Design of experiments in chemical engineering: a practical guide. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Amin AKMN, Imran M, Arif M (2002) Influence of cutting parameters on chatter and tool wear during end milling of stainless steel conducted on VMC. IIUM Eng J 3:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ertunç HM, Sevim İ (2001) Studies on tool wear condition monitoring. Pamukkale Univ J Eng Sci 7:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  33. Okay S, Kaplan Y, Motorcu AR, Nalbant M (2013) Evaluation of cutting tool wear characteristics and removed chip volumes in drilling of AISI D2 and AISI D3 cold work tool steels. 7th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’13) 30 October-1 November, Istanbul, Turkey

  34. Orhan S, Er AO, Camuşcu N, Aslan A (2007) Tool wear evaluation by vibration analysis during end milling of AISI D3 cold work tool steel with 35 HRC hardness. NDT&E Int 40:121–126. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kayhan M, Budak E (2009) An experimental investigation of chatter effects on tool life. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 223:1455–1463. doi:10.1243/09544054JEM1506

    Google Scholar 

  36. Durairaj M, Sudharsun D, Swamynathan N (2013) Analysis of process parameters in wire EDM with stainless steel using single objective Taguchi method and multi objective grey relational grade. Proc Eng 64:868–877. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Riza Motorcu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaplan, Y., Motorcu, A.R., Nalbant, M. et al. The effects of process parameters on acceleration amplitude in the drilling of cold work tool steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80, 1387–1401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7097-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7097-z

Keywords

Navigation